Verification and validation of dielectric mapping technique for non‐destructive evaluation of polymer matrix composites
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The rapid increase in use of polymer matrix composites in different industries underscores the need for reliable non‐destructive evaluation techniques to characterize small‐scale damage and prevent structural failure. A novel dielectric technique exploits moisture‐polymer interactions to identify and track damage, leveraging differences in dielectric properties between free and bound water. This technique has demonstrated the ability to detect low levels of damage, but the localization accuracy has not yet been evaluated. This work utilizes unsupervised machine learning to assess the technique's ability to identify the damage boundary following a low‐velocity impact event. Bismaleimide/quartz and E‐glass/epoxy laminates were impacted via drop tower to induce varying levels of damage, and subsequently inspected via dielectric technique at several moisture levels by weight. Resulting data was processed via k‐means clustering and the identified damage boundary was compared to a boundary obtained from backlit images and scanning electron microscopy. Accuracy was quantified using developed metrics for damage centroid and boundary identification. The technique averaged 93.9% accuracy in determining the damage center and 77.5% accuracy in identifying the damage boundary. Results indicated the technique's effectiveness across varying moisture levels, particularly in damage centroid identification. Localization accuracy was shown to be insensitive to moisture content, improving the technique's practical capabilities. Further analysis revealed potential for delineation of delaminations. Highlights Low‐velocity impact of two material architectures. Damage boundary determined and validated via scanning electron microscopy. Detected damage site via dielectric technique compared to damage boundary. High technique accuracy revealed; >90% centroid localization accuracy. Potential for delamination delineation observed.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Thermography and Photoacoustic Techniques · Smart Materials for Construction
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering North Carolina State University Raleigh North Carolina USA
Funding
National Science Foundation
References (71)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1177/168781402091376110.1177/1687814020913761 ↗
2. 10.1080/15583724.2015.107835210.1080/15583724.2015.1078352 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.08.11110.1016/j.proeng.2017.08.111 ↗
4. Polymer composites in aviation sector
5. CompositesWorld.Composites end markets: Automotive.2023.https://www.compositesworld.com/articles/composites‐end‐markets‐automotive‐2023
6. 10.1155/2020/883451810.1155/2020/8834518 ↗
7. 10.1533/9780857092229.2.25310.1533/9780857092229.2.253 ↗
8. Bossi RH · 201510.1016/B978-0-85709-523-7.00015-3 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jcomc.2022.10027610.1016/j.jcomc.2022.100276 ↗
10. 10.1007/s11029-013-9318-610.1007/s11029-013-9318-6 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2017.12.01910.1016/j.engfailanal.2017.12.019 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.cja.2019.09.01710.1016/j.cja.2019.09.017 ↗
13. 10.1017/CBO978051157450410.1017/CBO9780511574504 ↗
14. Non‐destructive testing of composite materials
15. 10.1177/00219980302973210.1177/002199803029732 ↗
16. Cook L. · 2009
17. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2017.10.02310.1016/j.compscitech.2017.10.023 ↗
18. 10.1533/9780857093554.4.63410.1533/9780857093554.4.634 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.infrared.2015.12.02610.1016/j.infrared.2015.12.026 ↗
20. Ultrasonic testing of carbon fiber‐reinforced polymer composites
21. 10.1533/9780857093554.3.39710.1533/9780857093554.3.397 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.paerosci.2021.10079110.1016/j.paerosci.2021.100791 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.10784310.1016/j.compositesb.2020.107843 ↗
24. 10.3390/s15051085210.3390/s150510852 ↗
25. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.24-25.23310.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.24-25.233 ↗
26. 10.1063/1.55597710.1063/1.555977 ↗
27. 10.1002/0471654507.eme30810.1002/0471654507.eme308 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.03.07010.1016/j.compstruct.2015.03.070 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.10863710.1016/j.compositesb.2021.108637 ↗
30. GuhaRD IdolorO GraceL.Molecular dynamics (MD) simulation of a polymer composite matrix with varying degree of moisture: investigation of secondary bonding interactions. Proceedings of the American Society for Composites.2019.10.12783/asc34/31367 ↗
31. 10.1039/D0SM02009E10.1039/D0SM02009E ↗
32. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2020.10968310.1016/j.commatsci.2020.109683 ↗
33. 10.1002/pc.2606610.1002/pc.26066 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.11537710.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115377 ↗
35. Rytter A · 1993
36. 10.1098/rsta.2019.058110.1098/rsta.2019.0581 ↗
37. IdolorO GuhaR BilichL GraceL.2‐dimensional mapping of damage in moisture contaminated polymer composites using dielectric properties. Proceedings of the American Society.2019.10.12783/asc34/31312 ↗
38. Idolor O · 2018 · 756
39. IdolorO GuhaR BerkowitzK GraceL.Damage detection in polymer matrix composites by analysis of polymer‐water interactions using near‐infrared spectroscopy Proceedings of the Americal Society for Composites.2021.10.12783/asc35/34874 ↗
40. 10.12783/asc36/3593310.12783/asc36/35933 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2024.10313710.1016/j.ndteint.2024.103137 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2022.10427710.1016/j.ijimpeng.2022.104277 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2012.07.00510.1016/j.ndteint.2012.07.005 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.11582210.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115822 ↗
45. 10.3390/s1921462910.3390/s19214629 ↗
46. ASTM Standard · 2010 · 1
47. 10.1016/S0955-2219(01)00343-010.1016/S0955-2219(01)00343-0 ↗
48. YseDL.Introduction to K‐means clustering Pinecone.https://www.pinecone.io/learn/k-means-clustering/
49. Introduction to K‐means clustering
50. MoshkovitzM DasguptaS RashtchianC FrostN.Explainable k‐means and k‐medians clustering. Proceedings of the 37th international conference on machine learning.2020.
51. Mohamad IB · 201310.19026/rjaset.6.3638 ↗
52. SayadS.K‐means clustering.https://www.saedsayad.com/clustering_kmeans.htm
53. Scikit‐learn: machine learning in python
54. Medium.K‐means clustering: Algorithm applications evaluation methods and drawbacks.https://towardsdatascience.com/k-means-clustering-algorithm-applications-evaluation-methods-and-drawbacks-aa03e644b48a
55. 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.298879610.1109/ACCESS.2020.2988796 ↗
56. scikit‐learn.Selecting the number of clusters with silhouette analysis on KMeans clustering.2007https://scikit-learn/stable/auto_examples/cluster/plot_kmeans_silhouette_analysis.html
57. 10.1002/1527-2648(200108)3:8<601::AID-ADEM601>3.0.CO;2-910.1002/1527-2648(200108)3:8<601::AID-ADEM601>3.0.CO;2-9 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.11.00510.1016/j.compositesb.2014.11.005 ↗
59. 10.1007/BF0072561510.1007/BF00725615 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.06.00410.1016/j.compositesb.2017.06.004 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2012.01.01910.1016/j.compscitech.2012.01.019 ↗
62. 10.1016/B978-0-08-102679-3.00004-610.1016/B978-0-08-102679-3.00004-6 ↗
63. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.02.02310.1016/j.compositesa.2016.02.023 ↗
64. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2005.02.00110.1016/j.compstruct.2005.02.001 ↗
65. 10.3390/polym1423520010.3390/polym14235200 ↗
66. 10.1155/2010/62140610.1155/2010/621406 ↗
67. 10.3390/jcs404014810.3390/jcs4040148 ↗
68. 10.1016/j.prostr.2019.05.03410.1016/j.prostr.2019.05.034 ↗
69. 10.1016/S0263-8223(03)00114-410.1016/S0263-8223(03)00114-4 ↗
70. 10.1016/j.procs.2022.01.00910.1016/j.procs.2022.01.009 ↗
71. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2022.11169010.1016/j.commatsci.2022.111690 ↗