journal article·2024-09-10

Improvement of thermal, mechanical, and electromagnetic interference shielding properties of polyethylene nanocomposites by introducing non‐covalently modified carbon nanotube and reactive polyethylene copolymer

Feng Tang, Young‐Gi Song, Jin‐Hyeok Park, Jongho Moon, Jun‐Hyeop Lee, Shinwoo Lee, Young Gyu Jeong

Polymer Composites· Volume 45· Issue 13
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract We herein report the enhancement of thermal, electrical, electromagnetic interference (EMI) shielding, and mechanical performance of polyethylene (PE) nanocomposites by the introduction of non‐covalently modified multi‐walled carbon nanotube (MWCNT) and ethylene‐glycidyl methacrylate (EGMA) copolymer. For this purpose, benzylacetic acid‐functionalized MWCNT (BA‐M) is prepared by ball milling, and it is melt‐mixed with EGMA to prepare a masterbatch. The masterbatch is then melt‐compounded with neat PE to manufacture a series of PE/EGMA/BA‐M nanocomposites with 0.5–5 wt% MWCNTs. Electron microscopic and spectroscopic analyses confirm the successful fabrication of non‐covalently functionalized BA‐M, the uniform dispersity of MWCNTs in the PE matrix, and the chemical reactions between the carboxylic acid groups of BA‐M and the epoxy group of EGMA in the nanocomposites. Scanning calorimetric data reveals that BA‐M acts as an efficient nucleating agent for the crystallization of PE. The excellent dispersity and robust interfacial bonding of BA‐M in the PE matrix result in improved electrical and EMI shielding properties in PE/EGMA/BA‐M nanocomposites. Furthermore, the tensile strength, initial modulus, and impact strength of the nanocomposites gradually rise as the BA‐M content increases. Thus, the PE/EGMA/BA‐M nanocomposite containing 5 wt% MWCNT achieves excellent performance of EMI shielding effectiveness of ~14.7 dB/mm, tensile strength of ~34.5 MPa, initial modulus of ~295.7 MPa, and impact strength of ~539.9 J/m, which represent enhancements of ~265%, ~40%, ~82%, and ~452%, respectively, compared to pristine PE. Highlights Non‐covalently modified MWCNT (BA‐M) was prepared by facile ball milling. PE nanocomposites with BA‐M and EGMA were prepared by masterbatch melt‐mixing. Excellent dispersity and interfacial bonding of MWCNT in the PE matrix were attained. Tensile strength and initial modulus of the nanocomposites were highly improved. EMI shielding effectiveness of the nanocomposite with 5 wt% MWCNT was ~14.7 dB/mm.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electromagnetic wave absorption materials · Polymer Nanocomposite Synthesis and Irradiation · Tribology and Wear Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Applied Organic Materials Engineering Chungnam National University Daejeon Republic of Korea

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea · Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy

References (50)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/pc.2005810.1002/pc.20058 ↗
2. 10.1002/pc.2417710.1002/pc.24177 ↗
3. 10.1002/pc.2690510.1002/pc.26905 ↗
4. 10.1002/pc.2651810.1002/pc.26518 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2023.11001010.1016/j.compscitech.2023.110010 ↗
6. 10.1002/pc.2777310.1002/pc.27773 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2023.10799810.1016/j.compositesa.2023.107998 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.10758110.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107581 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2023.11255410.1016/j.eurpolymj.2023.112554 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.11.01110.1016/j.compositesb.2018.11.011 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.10551710.1016/j.compositesa.2019.105517 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.molliq.2019.11191910.1016/j.molliq.2019.111919 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.cis.2020.10212610.1016/j.cis.2020.102126 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.carbon.2020.11.02610.1016/j.carbon.2020.11.026 ↗
15. 10.1002/adma.20050185110.1002/adma.200501851 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2010.07.00310.1016/j.compositesa.2010.07.003 ↗
17. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c0035110.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00351 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2020.10807610.1016/j.compscitech.2020.108076 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.11.05210.1016/j.compositesb.2011.11.052 ↗
20. 10.1021/jz401044810.1021/jz4010448 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2016.02.00810.1016/j.polymertesting.2016.02.008 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.11.02610.1016/j.compscitech.2018.11.026 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2019.04.02110.1016/j.compscitech.2019.04.021 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2020.10854910.1016/j.compscitech.2020.108549 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.carbon.2018.07.00310.1016/j.carbon.2018.07.003 ↗
26. 10.1002/admi.20170072710.1002/admi.201700727 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2023.11237910.1016/j.eurpolymj.2023.112379 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.carbon.2013.11.04210.1016/j.carbon.2013.11.042 ↗
29. 10.1002/adfm.20060059910.1002/adfm.200600599 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.polymer.2005.06.09410.1016/j.polymer.2005.06.094 ↗
31. 10.1039/C5TC01822F10.1039/C5TC01822F ↗
32. 10.1016/j.jcis.2023.06.10410.1016/j.jcis.2023.06.104 ↗
33. 10.1002/pc.2700910.1002/pc.27009 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.07.07010.1016/j.compositesb.2017.07.070 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2022.10735010.1016/j.compositesa.2022.107350 ↗
36. 10.1002/pc.2703810.1002/pc.27038 ↗
37. 10.1002/pc.2551210.1002/pc.25512 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.11.09210.1016/j.carbpol.2017.11.092 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.11.00310.1016/j.compositesa.2014.11.003 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.carbon.2015.01.00610.1016/j.carbon.2015.01.006 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2021.10895610.1016/j.compscitech.2021.108956 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2020.10606010.1016/j.compositesa.2020.106060 ↗
43. 10.1007/s00339‐018‐1564‐y10.1007/s00339‐018‐1564‐y ↗
44. 10.1016/j.carbon.2012.06.05310.1016/j.carbon.2012.06.053 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.08.03010.1016/j.compositesa.2016.08.030 ↗
46. 10.1039/C3RA46480F10.1039/C3RA46480F ↗
47. 10.1039/C5CP01452B10.1039/C5CP01452B ↗
48. 10.1021/acs.iecr.7b0540610.1021/acs.iecr.7b05406 ↗
49. 10.1002/pc.2664910.1002/pc.26649 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.12.01810.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.12.018 ↗