journal article·2025-10-10Open access

Microstructural‐based elastic property analysis in polymer nanocomposites via a fully convolutional semantic segmentation and meta‐modeling approaches

Behzad H. Soudmand, Jaber M. Asiri, Sarminah Samad, Ali E. Anqi, Sultan Alqahtani, Fawwaz Hazzazi, Nejib Ghazouani

Polymer Composites· Volume 46· Issue S3

Abstract

Abstract Silver (Ag) nanoparticles enhance conductivity in composite structures, offering a lightweight solution for solar panels. However, adequate rigidity is essential for withstanding mechanical and thermal stresses. This study investigates the relationship between microstructural features, weight fraction, dispersion pattern, and elastic properties in PA6/Ag nanocomposites, utilizing experimental data, advanced image segmentation techniques, and machine learning approaches. The measured elastic characteristics include Young's modulus (), bulk modulus (), and shear modulus (). To identify dispersion patterns, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of impact‐fractured surfaces from different compounds were analyzed using a Fully Convolutional Network (FCN) for precise nanoparticle segmentation. The trained FCN model provided particle size metrics, including minimum, maximum, and average values, which were then used to define a particle area distribution index (ADI) for each reinforced compound. A multiple linear regression (MLR) machine learning model was subsequently developed to correlate Ag weight fraction and ADI with elastic properties. SEM image analysis revealed a generally uniform nanoparticle dispersion, with an increasing tendency toward clustering at higher Ag loadings. ADI values decreased with higher Ag content, indicating a greater clustering tendency at higher Ag loadings. The MLR model results showed that elastic properties were directly influenced by both weight fraction and dispersion behavior, with a higher sensitivity to Ag loading than to particle size distribution trend within the matrix. Highlights A structure–property relationship was established in PA6/Ag nanocomposite. A novel FCN‐based approach quantifies microstructural dispersion An area distribution index linked nanoparticle dispersion to elastic traits A predictive meta‐model correlated Ag content, ADI, and elastic moduli. Filler content showed a stronger effect on elasticity than the dispersion pattern.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Machine Learning in Materials Science

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mechanical Engineering Gebze Technical University Kocaeli Turkey

Department of Mechanical Engineering College of Engineering, King Khalid University Abha Saudi Arabia

Department of Management College of Business Administration, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University Riyadh Saudi Arabia

Department of Electrical Engineering College of Engineering in Al‐Kharj, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University Al‐Kharj Saudi Arabia

Mining Research Center Northern Border University Arar Saudi Arabia

References (44)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s11668-022-01433-610.1007/s11668-022-01433-6 ↗
2. Experimental studies on mechanical properties and thermal behavior of polyoxymethylene/CaCO3 nanocomposites
3. 10.1016/j.triboint.2024.11045510.1016/j.triboint.2024.110455 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.egyr.2024.03.00710.1016/j.egyr.2024.03.007 ↗
5. 10.1007/s10853-020-05279-x10.1007/s10853-020-05279-x ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jcomc.2024.10043410.1016/j.jcomc.2024.100434 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2020.10511310.1016/j.engfailanal.2020.105113 ↗
8. Burr constitution analysis in ultrasonic‐assisted drilling of CFRP/nano‐graphene via experimental and data‐driven methodologies
9. Delamination assessment and prediction in ultrasonic‐assisted drilling of laminated hybrid composites10.1177/09544089241293584 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2022.10660610.1016/j.engfailanal.2022.106606 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2023.11036010.1016/j.compscitech.2023.110360 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.polymer.2024.12746310.1016/j.polymer.2024.127463 ↗
13. 10.1177/0021998324128949410.1177/00219983241289494 ↗
14. 10.1021/acs.iecr.4c0317510.1021/acs.iecr.4c03175 ↗
15. 10.1080/03602559.2017.132943810.1080/03602559.2017.1329438 ↗
16. 10.1177/002199832098789710.1177/0021998320987897 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.polymer.2019.12211910.1016/j.polymer.2019.122119 ↗
18. 10.1177/0954406221100579810.1177/09544062211005798 ↗
19. 10.1002/pc.2393610.1002/pc.23936 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.proeng.2014.12.10010.1016/j.proeng.2014.12.100 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2007.09.00210.1016/j.matchemphys.2007.09.002 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.matlet.2005.02.03310.1016/j.matlet.2005.02.033 ↗
23. 10.1515/pjct-2017-006510.1515/pjct-2017-0065 ↗
24. 10.1021/acsami.4c0279710.1021/acsami.4c02797 ↗
25. 10.1007/s10462‐023‐10631‐z10.1007/s10462‐023‐10631‐z ↗
26. 10.1039/D4NR01018C10.1039/D4NR01018C ↗
27. 10.1007/s00138-020-01157-310.1007/s00138-020-01157-3 ↗
28. 10.1109/TIFS.2021.307044410.1109/TIFS.2021.3070444 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.jmsy.2021.11.00410.1016/j.jmsy.2021.11.004 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.eswa.2022.11938810.1016/j.eswa.2022.119388 ↗
31. 10.3390/a1508028110.3390/a15080281 ↗
32. BaiY QiangD ZhangY et al.Recognition of nanocomposites agglomeration in scanning electron microscopy image with semantic segmentation algorithm. 2020 IEEE Conference on Electrical Insulation and Dielectric Phenomena (CEIDP) IEEE.2020374‐377.10.1109/CEIDP49254.2020.9437466 ↗
33. 10.1109/TPAMI.2016.257268310.1109/TPAMI.2016.2572683 ↗
34. SimonyanK ZissermanA.Very deep convolutional networks for large‐scale image recognition. arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.1556.2014.
35. 10.1016/j.future.2022.02.00710.1016/j.future.2022.02.007 ↗
36. Kinga D · 2015 · 6
37. 10.3390/app1102051810.3390/app11020518 ↗
38. 10.1016/0016-0032(61)90032-110.1016/0016-0032(61)90032-1 ↗
39. 10.1002/pc.2659810.1002/pc.26598 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.clay.2016.12.03310.1016/j.clay.2016.12.033 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.mechmat.2013.02.00410.1016/j.mechmat.2013.02.004 ↗
42. 10.1002/pc.2801810.1002/pc.28018 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.tafmec.2020.10266210.1016/j.tafmec.2020.102662 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.measurement.2015.06.01910.1016/j.measurement.2015.06.019 ↗