Dielectric spectroscopy and synergistic effects in epoxy composites filled with multi‐walled carbon nanotubes and carbon‐coated copper nanoparticles
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The electromagnetic properties of epoxy‐based composites filled with carbon‐coated copper (Cu@C) nanoparticles and multi‐walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs), along with hybrid MWCNT/Cu@C/Epoxy systems containing varying concentrations of nanoinclusions, were systematically investigated across multiple frequency and temperature ranges. Measurements were conducted in the low‐frequency range (20 Hz–1 MHz) and over a temperature span of 40–500 K, as well as in the microwave frequency range (26–37 GHz) at room temperature. The percolation threshold was identified at approximately 2.5 vol% for composites containing only Cu@C nanoparticles and at 0.3 vol% for composites with MWCNTs. Notably, the hybrid MWCNT/Cu@C/Epoxy composites exhibited significantly enhanced electromagnetic properties compared to those of the single‐filled systems. At room temperature, an epoxy composite containing 5 vol% Cu@C and 1 vol% MWCNT exhibits a conductivity of approximately 4 × 10−2 S/m, which increases by nearly two orders of magnitude following a thermal cycle up to 500 K. The total electromagnetic interference (EMI) shielding effectiveness in the 26–37 GHz range was measured between 4 and 9 dB, indicating the material's promising potential for attenuating microwave noise. Dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) results revealed that increasing the MWCNT content improved the storage modulus of the composites but led to a reduction in the glass transition temperature (Tg), which was observed to range between 40 and 50°C. The incorporation of MWCNTs and Cu@C nanoparticles into epoxy matrices offers a promising approach for the development of lightweight multifunctional composites with superior electrical, mechanical, and EMI shielding properties. Highlights The percolation threshold in MWCNT/Epoxy composites is 0.3%. The percolation threshold in Cu@C/Epoxy composites is 2%. The conductivity value of MWCNT/Cu@C/Epoxy composites is around 4 × 10−2 S/m. The total shielding effectiveness in the Ka‐band range between 4 and 9 dB. Glass transition temperature of MWCNT/Cu@C/Epoxy is between 40 and 50°C.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electromagnetic wave absorption materials · Dielectric materials and actuators · Conducting polymers and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute of Applied Electrodynamics and Telecommunications, Physics Faculty Vilnius University Vilnius Lithuania
Center for Physical Science and Technology Vilnius Lithuania
Institute of Chemistry and Chemical Technology, Faculty of Natural Sciences and Technology Riga Technical University Riga Latvia
References (54)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.3390/electronics1106094210.3390/electronics11060942 ↗
2. 10.5194/tc‐14‐4405‐202010.5194/tc‐14‐4405‐2020 ↗
3. 10.1109/MAP.2020.297631910.1109/MAP.2020.2976319 ↗
4. 10.3390/s2304235610.3390/s23042356 ↗
5. 10.37933/nipes/4.1.2022.610.37933/nipes/4.1.2022.6 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.apmt.2023.10204110.1016/j.apmt.2023.102041 ↗
7. 10.1109/TCPMT.2022.316727010.1109/TCPMT.2022.3167270 ↗
8. 10.1002/pssb.20098229410.1002/pssb.200982294 ↗
9. 10.1002/sus2.2110.1002/sus2.21 ↗
10. 10.1177/0967391105013007010.1177/09673911050130070 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2022.12895610.1016/j.colsurfa.2022.128956 ↗
12. 10.1039/C6TC04780G10.1039/C6TC04780G ↗
13. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.12.32310.1016/j.ceramint.2021.12.323 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.carbon.2020.10.06710.1016/j.carbon.2020.10.067 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.mechmat.2019.01.02010.1016/j.mechmat.2019.01.020 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2019.10245410.1016/j.ijadhadh.2019.102454 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11342110.1016/j.compstruct.2020.113421 ↗
18. 10.1021/acs.iecr.0c0451010.1021/acs.iecr.0c04510 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2020.10818310.1016/j.compscitech.2020.108183 ↗
20. 10.30919/es8d112010.30919/es8d1120 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2021.10876010.1016/j.compscitech.2021.108760 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.corsci.2021.10942810.1016/j.corsci.2021.109428 ↗
23. 10.1039/D1NA00050K10.1039/D1NA00050K ↗
24. 10.1016/j.mattod.2022.01.02210.1016/j.mattod.2022.01.022 ↗
25. 10.1016/B978‐0‐12‐816874‐5.00005‐010.1016/B978‐0‐12‐816874‐5.00005‐0 ↗
26. 10.30919/esee8c48810.30919/esee8c488 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.08.01210.1016/j.jmrt.2023.08.012 ↗
28. 10.1002/app.3379810.1002/app.33798 ↗
29. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b0428110.1021/acs.jpcc.8b04281 ↗
30. 10.1016/S0014‐3057(01)00115‐X10.1016/S0014‐3057(01)00115‐X ↗
31. 10.1016/j.matpr.2023.03.07310.1016/j.matpr.2023.03.073 ↗
32. 10.1002/adma.20200843210.1002/adma.202008432 ↗
33. 10.1016/S0032‐3861(03)00451‐810.1016/S0032‐3861(03)00451‐8 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.02.03710.1016/j.compscitech.2006.02.037 ↗
35. 10.1021/nn901604j10.1021/nn901604j ↗
36. 10.3390/jcs403010010.3390/jcs4030100 ↗
37. 10.3390/polym1112204410.3390/polym11122044 ↗
38. 10.3390/nano1102055510.3390/nano11020555 ↗
39. 10.1063/1.503052610.1063/1.5030526 ↗
40. 10.1007/s10904‐012‐9755‐z10.1007/s10904‐012‐9755‐z ↗
41. 10.1007/s13204‐019‐01083‐510.1007/s13204‐019‐01083‐5 ↗
42. 10.1177/0021998322109062910.1177/00219983221090629 ↗
43. 10.1007/BF0054236410.1007/BF00542364 ↗
44. 10.1016/0167‐2738(83)90079‐610.1016/0167‐2738(83)90079‐6 ↗
45. 10.1103/PhysRevB.70.14410610.1103/PhysRevB.70.144106 ↗
46. 10.1021/la051352s10.1021/la051352s ↗
47. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2016.03.02310.1016/j.compscitech.2016.03.023 ↗
48. 10.1063/1.481587010.1063/1.4815870 ↗
49. 10.1117/1.JNP.10.01251110.1117/1.JNP.10.012511 ↗
50. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.40.119710.1103/PhysRevLett.40.1197 ↗
51. 10.1088/2631‐8695/ac4a4a10.1088/2631‐8695/ac4a4a ↗
52. 10.1016/j.tsf.2011.01.19810.1016/j.tsf.2011.01.198 ↗
53. 10.1039/D2RA04206A10.1039/D2RA04206A ↗
54. 10.1007/s11029‐020‐09875‐510.1007/s11029‐020‐09875‐5 ↗