journal article·2023-07

Postbuckling behavior and failure prediction of large‐size composite C‐beam under bending‐shear coupling load

Ziyu Zhao, Tong Yang, Fa Zhang, Pibo Ma

Polymer Composites· Volume 44· Issue 7
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract In this article, a novel experimental device that combines bending and shearing was proposed to investigate the load‐bearing performance of large‐size C‐beam structures against bending‐shear buckling, allowing for the adjustment of bending‐shearing ratio. Three different bending‐shear coupling conditions were performed for test loading, and the strain gauges were carried out to detect the strain distribution for postbuckling performance of the large‐size C‐beam. The finite element models were established by ABAQUS/Explicit to explore the stress distribution and damage evolution during postbuckling failure. Thereafter, the LaRC05 and Hashin criterion was used for failure prediction of the large‐size C‐beam in numerical simulations. The experiment results show that the large‐size C‐beam has excellent postbuckling bearing capacity regardless of bending or shear resistance. Based on the results, the failure numerical model considering the stress distribution in postbuckling and the finite element calculation were in good agreement with experiments. This study can offer a practical reference for the postbuckling performance of large‐size C‐beam structures after bending‐shear coupling.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Structural Load-Bearing Analysis · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

College of Textile Science and Engineering Jiangnan University Wuxi China

Commercial Aircraft Corporation of China Beijing Civil Aircraft Technology Research Center Beijing China

Funding

Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions

References (41)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2016.02.00810.1016/j.compscitech.2016.02.008 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.06.11910.1016/j.compstruct.2018.06.119 ↗
3. 10.1002/pc.2570010.1002/pc.25700 ↗
4. 10.1002/pc.2606310.1002/pc.26063 ↗
5. 10.1002/pc.2694110.1002/pc.26941 ↗
6. 10.1115/1.155761410.1115/1.1557614 ↗
7. 10.1115/1.404568010.1115/1.4045680 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.tws.2021.10754310.1016/j.tws.2021.107543 ↗
9. 10.1016/0020-7683(84)90055-610.1016/0020-7683(84)90055-6 ↗
10. 10.1002/pc.2456210.1002/pc.24562 ↗
11. YangW ChangN WangW.National Defence Industry Press.2014.
12. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.04.06910.1016/j.compositesb.2016.04.069 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.09.02710.1016/j.compstruct.2017.09.027 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.istruc.2021.03.08510.1016/j.istruc.2021.03.085 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.01.10110.1016/j.compstruct.2018.01.101 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.08.01410.1016/j.compstruct.2016.08.014 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.11155310.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111553 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.11151110.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111511 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.mechrescom.2013.10.00410.1016/j.mechrescom.2013.10.004 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.01.04110.1016/j.compstruct.2019.01.041 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.03.00810.1016/j.compstruct.2017.03.008 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.tws.2019.04.00510.1016/j.tws.2019.04.005 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.08.09210.1016/j.compstruct.2018.08.092 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.tws.2020.10679710.1016/j.tws.2020.106797 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.02.00210.1016/j.compstruct.2014.02.002 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2019.03.00710.1016/j.engfracmech.2019.03.007 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.04.01910.1016/j.compstruct.2013.04.019 ↗
28. 10.1007/s00419-018-1496-110.1007/s00419-018-1496-1 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.tws.2017.01.00610.1016/j.tws.2017.01.006 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.11115110.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111151 ↗
31. 10.1177/073168441560207210.1177/0731684415602072 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.01.05310.1016/j.compositesb.2016.01.053 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.proeng.2011.07.30610.1016/j.proeng.2011.07.306 ↗
34. 10.1002/pc.2588610.1002/pc.25886 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.actaastro.2020.04.02410.1016/j.actaastro.2020.04.024 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2009.12.01010.1016/j.compstruct.2009.12.010 ↗
37. Closed solution for initial post‐buckling behavior analysis of a composite beam with shear deformation effect
38. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.11.05810.1016/j.compositesb.2018.11.058 ↗
39. 10.1002/pc.2622910.1002/pc.26229 ↗
40. 10.1002/pc.2682110.1002/pc.26821 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11346610.1016/j.compstruct.2020.113466 ↗