The mechanical effect of monitoring and controlling the impregnation in the resin infusion process
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Nowadays, most of industries are optimizing their processes to make their products more competitive. In the composites manufacturing industry, there is a big gap between the almost fully automated processes and those which require an intensive labor‐work. Although it has many advantages, the resin infusion process is characterized for its lack of automation. As a consequence, the results are strongly dependent on the process boundaries, the operator skills and expertise, and the result is usually far away from the optimum. In this work, the application of a novel methodology and its capability to maximize the mechanical properties of infusion‐manufactured composite materials is presented. After manufacturing stitched and unstitched materials at different impregnation velocities, an optimum value was assessed. The application of this value during the manufacture has increased the tensile and impact properties.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Epoxy Resin Curing Processes · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Fiber-reinforced polymer composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical and Mining Engineering Campus Las Lagunillas, University of Jaen Jaén Spain
Funding
Airbus
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. Khan L. A. · 2016 · 93
2. 10.1533/978184569782210.1533/9781845697822 ↗
3. Sterk S. · 2014
4. 10.1016/j.rcim.2017.12.00310.1016/j.rcim.2017.12.003 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.promfg.2020.10.11510.1016/j.promfg.2020.10.115 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.promfg.2020.10.12010.1016/j.promfg.2020.10.120 ↗
7. 10.1007/s13272-016-0184-510.1007/s13272-016-0184-5 ↗
8. Carlone P. · 2018 · 337
9. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2010.10.00210.1016/j.compositesa.2010.10.002 ↗
10. 10.1016/S1359-835X(00)00060-910.1016/S1359-835X(00)00060-9 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2004.04.00910.1016/j.compositesa.2004.04.009 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2021.10652210.1016/j.compositesa.2021.106522 ↗
13. 10.3390/polym1110166710.3390/polym11101667 ↗
14. Darcy H. ‘Les fontaines publiques de la ville de Dijon: exposition et application’ Dalmont p. 647 1856
15. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.06.01310.1016/j.compscitech.2005.06.013 ↗
16. 10.1177/002199831877215210.1177/0021998318772152 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.02.01810.1016/j.compositesa.2019.02.018 ↗
18. 10.1007/s11242-016-0629-710.1007/s11242-016-0629-7 ↗
19. 10.3390/jcs202001910.3390/jcs2020019 ↗
20. 10.1002/pc.2482010.1002/pc.24820 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2008.09.00810.1016/j.compositesa.2008.09.008 ↗
22. 10.1177/002199830203601624410.1177/0021998302036016244 ↗
23. Patou J. · 2016
24. 10.13111/2066-8201.2019.11.3.810.13111/2066-8201.2019.11.3.8 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.06.00310.1016/j.compositesa.2005.06.003 ↗
26. 10.1088/2053-1591/ac153210.1088/2053-1591/ac1532 ↗
27. 10.1177/002199831561499410.1177/0021998315614994 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.10.03110.1016/j.compscitech.2005.10.031 ↗
29. 10.1177/00219983950290060210.1177/002199839502900602 ↗
30. 10.3144/expresspolymlett.2015.1410.3144/expresspolymlett.2015.14 ↗
31. 10.3390/polym1207152510.3390/polym12071525 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.02.01010.1016/j.compositesa.2014.02.010 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2009.09.00610.1016/j.compositesa.2009.09.006 ↗
34. 10.5772/6601510.5772/66015 ↗
35. 10.1177/152808371877229910.1177/1528083718772299 ↗
36. 10.3390/ma1112235110.3390/ma11122351 ↗
37. ASTM International ASTM D3039 ‐ Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Polymer Matrix Composite Materials.1995.
38. ASTM International ‘ASTM D7136/D7136M. Standard Test Method for Measuring the Damage Resistance of a Fiber‐Reinforced Polymer Matrix Composite to a Drop‐Weight Impact Event’ 2012