Preparation of multiaxial glass fiber/epoxy prepreg and its mechanical properties in composites
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract This study investigates the mechanical properties of composites made from biaxial warp‐knitted glass fiber/epoxy prepregs (BW‐GF/EP) in comparison to plain woven glass fiber/epoxy prepregs (PW‐GF/EP). The BW‐GF/EP composites demonstrated superior tensile strength, with an increase of 9.5%, and bending strength, with an increase of 12.2%, compared to the PW‐GF/EP composites. Despite having a lower tensile modulus, the BW‐GF/EP composites exhibited 8.7% higher interlaminar shear strength. Dynamic mechanical analysis showed that both materials had similar storage and loss moduli at lower temperatures, with PW‐GF/EP performing better at higher temperatures. Microscopy revealed that failure in PW‐GF/EP occurred at weave intersections, while BW‐GF/EP composites showed fiber rupture and delamination. The findings highlight the advantages of using biaxial warp‐knitted fabrics for improved composite performance. Highlights Developed biaxial warp‐knitted fabric prepregs to replace liquid molding techniques. Improved interlaminar shear strength, reducing delamination risks in composites. Achieved higher tensile and bending strength compared to plain weave composites. Enhanced resin impregnation and molding efficiency with biaxial warp‐knitted fabrics. Reduced environmental impact and costs by avoiding VOCs and minimizing waste.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Epoxy Resin Curing Processes · Fiber-reinforced polymer composites · Mechanical Behavior of Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Materials Science and Engineering Tianjin University Tianjin China
College of Materials and Textile Engineering Jiaxing University Jiaxing China
Technical Research Institute NMG Composites Co., Ltd Jiaxing China
References (20)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11364010.1016/j.compstruct.2021.113640 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2022.12.02010.1016/j.jmapro.2022.12.020 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.06.27610.1016/j.matpr.2021.06.276 ↗
4. 10.1007/s10751-024-02109-310.1007/s10751-024-02109-3 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2024.05.13210.1016/j.jmrt.2024.05.132 ↗
6. 10.1007/s10751-024-01978-y10.1007/s10751-024-01978-y ↗
7. 10.1007/s12221-024-00519-210.1007/s12221-024-00519-2 ↗
8. 10.1007/s10751-024-01946-610.1007/s10751-024-01946-6 ↗
9. On micromechanics approach to stiffness and strength of unidirectional composites
10. 10.1016/j.coco.2022.10118410.1016/j.coco.2022.101184 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11482810.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114828 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2021.10865610.1016/j.compscitech.2021.108656 ↗
13. Biron M · 2013
14. 10.3390/polym1110166710.3390/polym11101667 ↗
15. 10.1016/B978-0-08-101273-4.00004-410.1016/B978-0-08-101273-4.00004-4 ↗
16. 10.1007/s10853-021-06177-610.1007/s10853-021-06177-6 ↗
17. 10.1177/152808371989438910.1177/1528083719894389 ↗
18. 10.1177/004051751667915510.1177/0040517516679155 ↗
19. 10.3390/ma1610368010.3390/ma16103680 ↗
20. Liquid composite molding processes