journal article·2024-12-10Open access

Geometry accuracy control in abrasive water jet taper hole machining of ultra‐thick carbon fiber‐reinforced polymer ( CFRP) laminates

Wei Liang, Liang Cheng, Huiyue Dong, Minghua Zhu, Yingjie Guo, Yinglin Ke

Polymer Composites· Volume 45· Issue 17

Abstract

Abstract The primary factors affecting the geometric accuracy of abrasive water jet (AWJ) machining of ultra‐thick carbon fiber‐reinforced polymer (CFRP) laminates are the cutting front drag and kerf width deviation caused by energy dissipation. Firstly, this study comprehensively analyzes the influence of the coupling relationship between cutting front drag and kerf width deviation on the geometric accuracy of hole machining. Secondly, a gradient distribution theory for jet traverse speed with cutting depth is proposed for taper hole machining characteristics. Finally, a general geometric error model applicable to both straight and taper hole machining of ultra‐thick CFRP laminates using AWJ is established, along with a geometric error compensation method. A series of experiments validate the accuracy of the proposed geometric error model and compensation method. The novelty of this research lies in unifying the geometric error models for straight and taper hole machining of ultra‐thick CFRP laminates by considering the gradient distribution of jet traverse speed. The proposed error compensation method reduces the high degree of freedom required for machine tools. This study provides a general geometric error model and compensation strategy for AWJ hole machining of ultra‐thick CFRP laminates, which has significant engineering value for achieving 3D controllable AWJ machining of complex ultra‐thick CFRP components. Highlights The high geometric precision taper holes machining technique is a necessary prerequisite for achieving precise machining of complex trajectories in ultra‐thick CFRP with abrasive water jet. The influence of the coupling relationship between cutting front drag and kerf taper on the geometric accuracy of hole processing is comprehensively analyzed. A model considering the gradient distribution of traverse speed during taper holes machining was established, and a geometric error model considering this gradient distribution of traverse speed was developed. A taper holes machining geometric error compensation method with high engineering applicability was proposed. Geometric error prediction experiments and error compensation experiments were conducted, and the results proved the accuracy of the geometric error model and error compensation method.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Erosion and Abrasive Machining · Advanced machining processes and optimization · Tunneling and Rock Mechanics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

State Key Laboratory of Fluid Power and Mechatronic Systems, School of Mechanical Engineering Zhejiang University Hangzhou China

Key Laboratory of Advanced Manufacturing Technology of Zhejiang Province, School of Mechanical Engineering Zhejiang University Hangzhou China

Jiangnan Shipyard (Group) Co., Ltd. Shanghai China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (34)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.10555210.1016/j.compositesa.2019.105552 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.10915510.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109155 ↗
3. 10.1177/002199831244314110.1177/0021998312443141 ↗
4. 10.1007/s00170‐021‐07929‐z10.1007/s00170‐021‐07929‐z ↗
5. Nguyen‐Dinh N · 2018 · 1
6. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.12.00610.1016/j.compstruct.2018.12.006 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.07.00510.1016/j.compositesa.2014.07.005 ↗
8. Machining of fiber reinforced composites: review of environmental and health effects
9. 10.1016/j.cirpj.2016.10.00210.1016/j.cirpj.2016.10.002 ↗
10. 10.1002/pc.2334810.1002/pc.23348 ↗
11. 10.1002/pc.2799710.1002/pc.27997 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.measurement.2017.11.05910.1016/j.measurement.2017.11.059 ↗
13. 10.1007/s00170020011510.1007/s001700200115 ↗
14. 10.1016/S0043‐1648(03)00256‐410.1016/S0043‐1648(03)00256‐4 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.measurement.2020.10809310.1016/j.measurement.2020.108093 ↗
16. 10.1002/pc.2676210.1002/pc.26762 ↗
17. 10.1016/S0924‐0136(98)00443‐910.1016/S0924‐0136(98)00443‐9 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.procir.2017.12.10910.1016/j.procir.2017.12.109 ↗
19. 10.1007/s00170‐015‐7020‐710.1007/s00170‐015‐7020‐7 ↗
20. 10.1002/pc.2822410.1002/pc.28224 ↗
21. 10.1002/pc.2830710.1002/pc.28307 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.precisioneng.2022.10.00910.1016/j.precisioneng.2022.10.009 ↗
23. 10.1007/s00170‐019‐04803‐x10.1007/s00170‐019‐04803‐x ↗
24. 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.03.55410.1016/j.matpr.2020.03.554 ↗
25. FinnieI.The mechanism of erosion of ductile metals. Proceedings of the 3rd National Congress of Applied Mechanics ASME 1958; 527–532.
26. 10.1115/1.322568210.1115/1.3225682 ↗
27. 10.1088/1757‐899X/307/1/01201510.1088/1757‐899X/307/1/012015 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2024.10805510.1016/j.compositesa.2024.108055 ↗
29. 10.1007/s00170‐011‐3815‐310.1007/s00170‐011‐3815‐3 ↗
30. 10.1007/s00170‐014‐6578‐910.1007/s00170‐014‐6578‐9 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2008.07.00110.1016/j.ijmachtools.2008.07.001 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.measurement.2021.10949210.1016/j.measurement.2021.109492 ↗
33. 10.1007/s00170‐011‐3788‐210.1007/s00170‐011‐3788‐2 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.precisioneng.2018.04.00310.1016/j.precisioneng.2018.04.003 ↗