journal article·2024-07-10

Ultra‐strong and biodegradable nanocomposite fibers of poly(butylene adipate‐co‐terephthalate)/cellulose nanocrystal prepared by dry‐jet wet spinning

Youngeun Lee, Min Woo Kim, Hyo Jeong Kim, Jin Kyung Kim, Tae Kyung Won, Jin Miyawaki, Han Gi Chae, Youngho Eom

Polymer Composites· Volume 45· Issue 10
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Fiber‐based products constitute a significant portion of plastic waste and cause environmental damage. In particular, discarded sanitary masks and fishing gear disintegrate into microfiber plastics, posing a significant threat to human health and ecosystems. In this study, we developed robust biodegradable nanocomposite fibers of poly(butylene adipate‐co‐terephthalate) (PBAT)/cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs) (1 and 2 wt%) through dry‐jet wet spinning, by using dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) as a common solvent. The control PBAT fibers exhibit remarkable mechanical performance with tensile strength and toughness of 160.0 MPa and 43.0 MJ m−3, respectively. CNC addition has a toughening effect with slightly reduced strength but enhanced toughness (148.8 MPa and 69.0 MJ m−3, respectively, for 2 wt% CNC); their mechanical performances are superior to those of previously reported PBAT‐based materials. The remarkable performance of the fibers is attributed to a highly oriented structure with a total draw ratio of 15 after post‐hot drawing. The control and nanocomposite fibers exhibit spot‐like patterns in 2D wide‐angle x‐ray diffraction patterns with Herman's orientation factor of 0.54–0.58. The theoretical Hansen solubility parameter confirmed the poor chemical affinity between the PBAT and CNC. Nonetheless, the rheological characterization revealed that well‐dispersed CNCs with DMSO produced a physical network in the PBAT matrix, resulting in the toughening effect. Such robust nanocomposite fibers consisting of fully biodegradable components are promising alternatives to nondegradable nylon and polyester fibers. Highlights Robust biodegradable nanocomposite fibers of PBAT and CNC are prepared. Nanocomposite fibers are dry‐jet wet spun using DMSO as a common solvent. PBAT fibers exhibit strength and toughness of 160.0 MPa and 43.0 MJ m−3. 2 wt% CNC toughens the PBAT fibers with an enhanced toughness of 69.0 MJ m−3. Rheological results confirm the toughening effect of well‐dispersed CNC in PBAT.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Polymer Engineering Pukyong National University Busan Republic of Korea

School of Materials Science and Engineering Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology (UNIST) Ulsan Republic of Korea

Department of Organic and Nano Engineering Hanyang University Seoul Republic of Korea

Interdisciplinary Graduate School of Engineering Sciences Kyushu University Fukuoka Japan

Institute for Materials Chemistry and Engineering Kyushu University Fukuoka Japan

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea

References (64)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s13233‐021‐9080‐x10.1007/s13233‐021‐9080‐x ↗
2. 10.1007/s10570‐023‐05171‐210.1007/s10570‐023‐05171‐2 ↗
3. 10.1007/s42765‐022‐00194‐z10.1007/s42765‐022‐00194‐z ↗
4. 10.1007/s42765‐020‐00049‐510.1007/s42765‐020‐00049‐5 ↗
5. 10.3390/catal1209094810.3390/catal12090948 ↗
6. 10.1007/s11356‐021‐17408‐310.1007/s11356‐021‐17408‐3 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2022.11955510.1016/j.carbpol.2022.119555 ↗
8. 10.1007/s42765‐021‐00092‐w10.1007/s42765‐021‐00092‐w ↗
9. 10.1021/acsapm.2c0092810.1021/acsapm.2c00928 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2021.11089510.1016/j.eurpolymj.2021.110895 ↗
11. 10.1007/s42114‐023‐00687‐410.1007/s42114‐023‐00687‐4 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.10904210.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109042 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2019.01.03410.1016/j.matchemphys.2019.01.034 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.polymer.2005.10.06510.1016/j.polymer.2005.10.065 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.polymer.2005.11.05110.1016/j.polymer.2005.11.051 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2022.10984710.1016/j.compscitech.2022.109847 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2022.11130410.1016/j.eurpolymj.2022.111304 ↗
18. 10.1177/089270572198977110.1177/0892705721989771 ↗
19. 10.1021/acsapm.2c0150710.1021/acsapm.2c01507 ↗
20. Polylactic acid (PLA) market size share report anaylsis trends growth 2030. Zionmarket research.2023https://www.zionmarketresearch.com/report/polylactic‐acid‐marketAcessed Dec 2023.
21. Polybutylene adipate terephthalate market size share growth report 2030. Zionmarket research.2023https://www.zionmarketresearch.com/report/polybutylene‐adipate‐terephthalate‐marketAcessed May 2023.
22. 10.1002/pc.2571610.1002/pc.25716 ↗
23. 10.1007/s10924‐019‐01389‐z10.1007/s10924‐019‐01389‐z ↗
24. 10.1007/s10570‐021‐04040‐010.1007/s10570‐021‐04040‐0 ↗
25. 10.1007/s13367‐023‐00049‐y10.1007/s13367‐023‐00049‐y ↗
26. 10.1007/s00289‐015‐1594‐y10.1007/s00289‐015‐1594‐y ↗
27. 10.1007/s10570‐020‐03460‐810.1007/s10570‐020‐03460‐8 ↗
28. 10.1021/acsapm.2c0169410.1021/acsapm.2c01694 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.cej.2022.13798310.1016/j.cej.2022.137983 ↗
30. 10.1080/1029843060114965010.1080/10298430601149650 ↗
31. 10.3390/polym1603041110.3390/polym16030411 ↗
32. 10.1002/masy.20035073710.1002/masy.200350737 ↗
33. 10.1007/s13367‐021‐0015‐z10.1007/s13367‐021‐0015‐z ↗
34. 10.1021/acsami.8b2258610.1021/acsami.8b22586 ↗
35. 10.3390/polym1303038910.3390/polym13030389 ↗
36. 10.1021/acs.biomac.7b0057810.1021/acs.biomac.7b00578 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.01.08910.1016/j.carbpol.2017.01.089 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.07.09710.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.07.097 ↗
39. 10.1007/s42114‐022‐00534‐y10.1007/s42114‐022‐00534‐y ↗
40. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2022.11012210.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2022.110122 ↗
41. 10.1002/pola.1050110.1002/pola.10501 ↗
42. 10.1080/15421406.2022.204735510.1080/15421406.2022.2047355 ↗
43. 10.1007/s12649‐019‐00610‐310.1007/s12649‐019‐00610‐3 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2020.10845210.1016/j.compscitech.2020.108452 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.10909810.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109098 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.03.06410.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.03.064 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2023.12067710.1016/j.carbpol.2023.120677 ↗
48. 10.1007/s13233‐021‐9001‐z10.1007/s13233‐021‐9001‐z ↗
49. 10.1016/j.polymer.2014.03.04710.1016/j.polymer.2014.03.047 ↗
50. 10.1039/d3cp00654a10.1039/d3cp00654a ↗
51. 10.1039/c9nr08091k10.1039/c9nr08091k ↗
52. 10.1016/j.rineng.2023.10103110.1016/j.rineng.2023.101031 ↗
53. 10.1002/mame.20210016110.1002/mame.202100161 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.11668710.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116687 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.10.03810.1016/j.compositesa.2015.10.038 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2017.10.02610.1016/j.eurpolymj.2017.10.026 ↗
57. 10.3390/nano1101024910.3390/nano11010249 ↗
58. 10.1016/S0142‐9418(01)00107‐610.1016/S0142‐9418(01)00107‐6 ↗
59. 10.1002/pc.2557510.1002/pc.25575 ↗
60. 10.1007/s00289‐018‐2385‐z10.1007/s00289‐018‐2385‐z ↗
61. 10.1002/pc.2720210.1002/pc.27202 ↗
62. 10.1039/d0gc01688h.os10.1039/d0gc01688h.os ↗
63. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2023.11210610.1016/j.eurpolymj.2023.112106 ↗
64. 10.1177/002199831559659210.1177/0021998315596592 ↗