journal article·2024-03-10

Prediction of pseudo‐ductility and structural optimization of nacre‐inspired carbon fiber‐reinforced polymer laminate

Lin Xiao, Xiaodan Li, Runlin Han, Chunrui Lu, Guanhui Wang, Lei Chen, Dongxing Zhang

Polymer Composites· Volume 45· Issue 4
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract To enhance the ductility of carbon fiber‐reinforced polymer (CFRP) composites, a variety of nacre‐inspired structures with discontinuities were constructed based on the ratio of overlapping length to CFRP laminate thickness. The damage mechanisms and tensile characteristics of discontinuous laminates were elucidated using finite element analysis and experimental investigation. To anticipate the mechanical behavior of the CFRP laminate, an improved Chang‐Chang failure criteria was devised. Moreover, a model adopts the Benzeggagh‐Kenane criterion on cohesive surfaces for delamination initiation and propagation. The predicted stress–strain values are validated using experimental data under tensile stress. Furthermore, a mathematical model accurately predicted the relationship between the tensile performance of nacre‐inspired laminate and overlapping length. According to the findings, the longer the overlapping length (more than 19.5 mm) is, the lower the pseudo‐ductility. Meanwhile, the shorter the overlapping length (less than 17.5 mm) is, the lower the tensile strength. Furthermore, the laminate exhibits some pseudo‐ductility as well as little decrease in tensile strength when the overlapping length is approximately 18.5 mm. Highlights A mathematical model for predicting the tensile properties of various nacre‐inspired laminates was established. The relationship between the discontinuous structure and the pseudo‐ductility of the nacre‐inspired laminate was revealed. Compared with other similar structural laminates, the laminate with an overlapping length of 17.5 mm has better overall performance. Proposed an improved Chang‐Chang progressive failure criterion that was utilized to simulate and analyze the mechanical response and damage of the nacre‐inspired laminates under tension.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Calcium Carbonate Crystallization and Inhibition · Polymer composites and self-healing

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering Jinggangshan University Ji'an China

Jinggangshan University Ji'an Key Laboratory of High Performance and Environmental Protection Composites Ji'an China

School of Materials Science and Engineering Harbin Institute of Technology Harbin China

School of Equipment Engineering Shenyang Ligong University Shenyang China

College of Sericulture, Textile and Biomass Science Southwest University Chongqing China

Funding

Venture and Innovation Support Program for Chongqing Overseas Returnees

References (37)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/pc.2701410.1002/pc.27014 ↗
2. 10.1002/pc.2718910.1002/pc.27189 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.11.12610.1016/j.compositesb.2018.11.126 ↗
4. 10.1002/pc.2721010.1002/pc.27210 ↗
5. 10.1002/pc.2722510.1002/pc.27225 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.addma.2022.10283010.1016/j.addma.2022.102830 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.ast.2022.10759910.1016/j.ast.2022.107599 ↗
8. 10.1002/pc.2704410.1002/pc.27044 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.12.03010.1016/j.compositesb.2018.12.030 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.11143110.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111431 ↗
11. 10.1016/B978‐0‐12‐819611‐3.00010‐810.1016/B978‐0‐12‐819611‐3.00010‐8 ↗
12. 10.1002/admi.20190097010.1002/admi.201900970 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.polymer.2019.12160210.1016/j.polymer.2019.121602 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12342110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123421 ↗
15. 10.1002/pc.2634710.1002/pc.26347 ↗
16. 10.1177/0021998321100291510.1177/00219983211002915 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.11568410.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115684 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2021.12798910.1016/j.surfcoat.2021.127989 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jdent.2016.07.00910.1016/j.jdent.2016.07.009 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2017.11.00510.1016/j.compositesa.2017.11.005 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2017.08.02410.1016/j.compscitech.2017.08.024 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.10954610.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109546 ↗
23. 10.1177/0021998321105656010.1177/00219983211056560 ↗
24. 10.1126/science.122085410.1126/science.1220854 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2014.10.02210.1016/j.compscitech.2014.10.022 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2017.11.03310.1016/j.compscitech.2017.11.033 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.02.03210.1016/j.compositesa.2018.02.032 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.11.05810.1016/j.compstruct.2018.11.058 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2013.07.00810.1016/j.compositesa.2013.07.008 ↗
30. 10.1002/pc.2690410.1002/pc.26904 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2021.10669010.1016/j.compositesa.2021.106690 ↗
32. 10.1002/pc.2730810.1002/pc.27308 ↗
33. 10.1002/pc.2733310.1002/pc.27333 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2021.10304210.1016/j.ijadhadh.2021.103042 ↗
35. 10.1002/pc.2739610.1002/pc.27396 ↗
36. Failure analysis of thick composite laminates with multi‐scale modelling under G13 out‐of‐plane shear loading
37. 10.1002/pc.2756710.1002/pc.27567 ↗