journal article·2023-03

Quasi‐static fracture characterization of fiber metal laminate with crack resistance curve based on δ5

Jipeng Zhang, Yue Wang, Wen Yang, Xiangjun Dai, Yuan Zhao, Guodong Fang

Polymer Composites· Volume 44· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Fiber metal laminate (FML) is a hybrid composite typical in aircraft industry. It is necessary to effectively characterize the quasi‐static fracture performance of FML, considering the importance of damage tolerance design of aircraft structures and the complicated fracture mechanism of FML. In present investigation, glass fiber reinforced aluminum laminates (Glare) with middle cracks were tested under quasi‐static tensile load. The experimental crack resistance curve (R curve) based on the special crack opening displacement at original crack tip (δ5) was used for revealing the superior crack resistance of Glare laminate to aluminum sheet, which expressed in crack extension aspect was the extended critical crack length. This was thought to be benefit from the contributions of glass fiber layers and fiber/metal delamination, by performing the progressive damage analysis. Since δ5 can embody the elastic–plastic response of the crack but without need to interactively correct for crack tip plasticity. The δ5‐R curve‐based macro and meso fracture models were proposed to accurately predict the residual strength and stable crack extension of Glare laminate, which gave further evidence for the effectiveness of δ5‐R curve in characterizing the quasi‐static fracture performance of FML.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Mechanical stress and fatigue analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Transportation and Vehicle Engineering Shandong University of Technology Zibo China

College of Engineering Zhejiang Normal University Jinhua China

National Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on Advanced Composites in Special Environments Harbin Institute of Technology Harbin China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China · Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province

References (51)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/978-94-010-0995-910.1007/978-94-010-0995-9 ↗
2. 10.1002/pc.2644610.1002/pc.26446 ↗
3. 10.1002/pc.2647410.1002/pc.26474 ↗
4. 10.1002/pc.2650910.1002/pc.26509 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.matdes.2015.08.02910.1016/j.matdes.2015.08.029 ↗
6. T. J.deVries Blunt and Sharp Notch Behavior of Glare Laminates Ph.D. Dissertation Delft University of Technology Delft 2001.
7. 10.1590/S1516-1439200200020000610.1590/S1516-14392002000200006 ↗
8. 10.1016/S0263-8231(03)00107-110.1016/S0263-8231(03)00107-1 ↗
9. 10.1016/S0013-7944(03)00138-310.1016/S0013-7944(03)00138-3 ↗
10. 10.1111/j.1460-2695.2004.00803.x10.1111/j.1460-2695.2004.00803.x ↗
11. Macheret J. · Proc. 8th ECF Fract. Behav. Des. Mater. Struct · 1990 · 288
12. 10.1016/S0022-5096(99)00011-310.1016/S0022-5096(99)00011-3 ↗
13. 10.1016/S0013-7944(02)00125-X10.1016/S0013-7944(02)00125-X ↗
14. K. M.Sihombing The Application of Fx‐Fiber in Fiber Metal Laminates M. S. Dissertation Delft University of Technology Delft1999.
15. Y. A. R.Apsoro Towards Fx FML M. S. Dissertation Delft University of Technology Delft1999.
16. 10.1046/j.1460-2695.2002.00552.x10.1046/j.1460-2695.2002.00552.x ↗
17. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.05.00810.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.05.008 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2016.03.02410.1016/j.engfracmech.2016.03.024 ↗
19. 10.1111/ffe.1222610.1111/ffe.12226 ↗
20. 10.1016/S0045-7825(99)00258-310.1016/S0045-7825(99)00258-3 ↗
21. 10.1016/S0266-3538(97)00108-510.1016/S0266-3538(97)00108-5 ↗
22. C. A. J. R.Vermeeren The Residual Strength of Fiber Metal Laminates Ph.D. Dissertation Delft University of Technology Delft1995.
23. R.Rodi The Residual Strength Failure Sequence in Fiber Metal Laminates Ph.D. Dissertation Delft University of Technology Delft2012.
24. 10.1016/0013-7944(93)90061-V10.1016/0013-7944(93)90061-V ↗
25. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2012.02.00110.1016/j.engfracmech.2012.02.001 ↗
26. 10.1016/0921-5093(96)10396-810.1016/0921-5093(96)10396-8 ↗
27. 10.1016/0266-3538(96)00070-X10.1016/0266-3538(96)00070-X ↗
28. 10.1007/978-3-319-56227-810.1007/978-3-319-56227-8 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.12.06010.1016/j.compstruct.2014.12.060 ↗
30. 10.1016/0013-7944(92)90212-W10.1016/0013-7944(92)90212-W ↗
31. ASTM E2472 Standard Test Method for Determination of Resistance to Stable Crack Extension under Low‐Constraint Conditions 2012.
32. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2008.04.00910.1016/j.engfracmech.2008.04.009 ↗
33. 10.1111/ffe.1248710.1111/ffe.12487 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2021.10770110.1016/j.engfracmech.2021.107701 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2019.10686110.1016/j.engfracmech.2019.106861 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.tafmec.2021.10299410.1016/j.tafmec.2021.102994 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2018.11.00810.1016/j.ijpvp.2018.11.008 ↗
38. Zerbst U. · 2013
39. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.11.01610.1016/j.compstruct.2017.11.016 ↗
40. ASTM E561 Standard Test method for K‐R Curve Determination 2015.
41. Dixon J. R. · Soc. · 1960 · 64 · 141
42. 10.1115/1.80153510.1115/1.801535 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2005.07.03010.1016/j.ijfatigue.2005.07.030 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.01.00910.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.01.009 ↗
45. Jones R. M. · 1999
46. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.12.02310.1016/j.compscitech.2005.12.023 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.05.03110.1016/j.compositesa.2016.05.031 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2010.07.02210.1016/j.compscitech.2010.07.022 ↗
49. 10.1007/s10704-020-00456-010.1007/s10704-020-00456-0 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.12.02710.1016/j.compositesa.2018.12.027 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.coco.2020.10040810.1016/j.coco.2020.100408 ↗