journal article·2011-10

Empirical models for matrix cracking in a CFRP cross‐ply laminate under static‐ and cyclic‐fatigue loadings

Keiji Ogi, Manabu Takahashi, Shigeki Yashiro

Polymer Composites· Volume 32· Issue 10
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract This paper presents empirical models for predicting matrix crack density in a carbon fiber reinforced plastic (CFRP) cross‐ply laminate under static‐fatigue and cyclic‐fatigue loadings. First, a modified slow crack growth (SCG) law, that covers the whole range of stress ratio R of tension‐tension fatigue (0 ≤ R ≤ 1), was proposed. The modified SCG law and three conventional SCG laws were then combined with Weibull's probabilistic failure concept for predicting fatigue matrix crack density in a cross‐ply laminate. Matrix crack density was expressed as a function of R, the maximum stress in the transverse ply and the number of cycles. Next, fatigue tests were performed for R of 0, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, and 1 to determine the applicability of these four models. Finally, constant fatigue life (CFL) diagrams were investigated based on the modified model. POLYM. COMPOS., 2011. © 2011 Society of Plastics Engineers
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (28)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1115/1.138139510.1115/1.1381395 ↗
2. 10.1016/S0142-1123(01)00103-710.1016/S0142-1123(01)00103-7 ↗
3. 10.1016/S0266-3538(97)00221-210.1016/S0266-3538(97)00221-2 ↗
4. 10.1016/S0142-1123(00)00030-X10.1016/S0142-1123(00)00030-X ↗
5. 10.1016/0010-4361(95)92620-R10.1016/0010-4361(95)92620-R ↗
6. 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2004.00007.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2004.00007.x ↗
7. 10.1016/S1359-6454(96)00260-110.1016/S1359-6454(96)00260-1 ↗
8. 10.1007/s10704-005-9062-610.1007/s10704-005-9062-6 ↗
9. 10.1115/1.151955710.1115/1.1519557 ↗
10. 10.1016/0266-3538(85)90060-010.1016/0266-3538(85)90060-0 ↗
11. 10.1177/00219983890230070610.1177/002199838902300706 ↗
12. 10.1016/S0266-3538(01)00068-910.1016/S0266-3538(01)00068-9 ↗
13. 10.1016/S0266-3538(01)00125-710.1016/S0266-3538(01)00125-7 ↗
14. 10.1016/S0266-3538(02)00068-410.1016/S0266-3538(02)00068-4 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.02.04510.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.02.045 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.11.02310.1016/j.compscitech.2008.11.023 ↗
17. 10.1163/156855109X43478410.1163/156855109X434784 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2009.11.00510.1016/j.compositesa.2009.11.005 ↗
19. 10.1016/0266-3538(87)90076-510.1016/0266-3538(87)90076-5 ↗
20. 10.1016/0013-7944(94)90109-010.1016/0013-7944(94)90109-0 ↗
21. 10.1520/STP32032S10.1520/STP32032S ↗
22. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2003.10.01610.1016/j.ijfatigue.2003.10.016 ↗
23. 10.1115/1.360963710.1115/1.3609637 ↗
24. 10.1016/0013-7944(70)90028-710.1016/0013-7944(70)90028-7 ↗
25. 10.1177/00219983950290140110.1177/002199839502901401 ↗
26. 10.1016/0013-7944(85)90140-710.1016/0013-7944(85)90140-7 ↗
27. Masters J. E. · Damage in Composite Materials, ASTM STP · 1982 · 775 · 40
28. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2009.06.01210.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2009.06.012 ↗