Fabrication and performance of a polyethersulfone nanofiltration membrane impregnated with a mesoporous silica–poly(1‐VInylpyrrolidone) nanocomposite
Source abstract
Abstract
Fouling is a serious problem in the membrane formation process. Adding hydrophilic polymers or inorganic particles into the membrane is an effective way for improving the antifouling performance. However, most of the water‐soluble polymeric additives leach out during the phase inversion process, and the inorganic particles are prone to agglomerate in the membrane, which decreases the antifouling property of the membrane. In this study, poly(1‐vinylpyrrolidone) (PVP) was grafted onto mesoporous silica (MS) nanoparticle surface, and polyethersulfone (PES)/MS–PVP nanocomposite membranes were fabricated by the phase inversion method. MS–PVP dispersed well on the membrane surface, and the hydrophilicity of the PES/MS–PVP membranes increased with increasing content of MS–PVP. PES/MS–PVP membranes exhibited higher water flux than that of the bare PES membrane without any loss in NaCl rejection, and water flux of 25 L/m2h could be achieved by the membrane containing 3% of MS–PVP, which is almost 1.5 times as high as that of bare PES membrane at 0.6 MPa. The protein adsorption onto the membrane surface declined significantly from 49 to 25 mg/cm2 when the MS–PVP loading increased from 0% to 3%. POLYM. COMPOS., 38:908–917, 2017. © 2015 Society of Plastics Engineers
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Membrane Separation Technologies · Membrane-based Ion Separation Techniques · Fuel Cells and Related Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
College of Ecology Lishui University Lishui Zhejiang 323000 China
Funding
The Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China · The Foundation of Zhejiang Educational Committee · The Foundation of Science and Technology, Department of Zhejiang Province of China
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.memsci.2014.02.03910.1016/j.memsci.2014.02.039 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.11.01110.1016/j.jenvman.2010.11.011 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.memsci.2009.12.01410.1016/j.memsci.2009.12.014 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.memsci.2014.04.03110.1016/j.memsci.2014.04.031 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.memsci.2008.06.01410.1016/j.memsci.2008.06.014 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.memsci.2010.04.00310.1016/j.memsci.2010.04.003 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.memsci.2014.04.01610.1016/j.memsci.2014.04.016 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.desal.2012.02.00610.1016/j.desal.2012.02.006 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.memsci.2012.12.00510.1016/j.memsci.2012.12.005 ↗
10. 10.1039/c1jm11040c10.1039/c1jm11040c ↗
11. Liang S. · J. Membr. Sci. · 2012 · 394
12. Kim E.S. · J. Membr. Sci. · 2012 · 394
13. 10.1039/c1cs15103g10.1039/c1cs15103g ↗
14. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2014.06.00610.1016/j.matchemphys.2014.06.006 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.memsci.2012.12.04610.1016/j.memsci.2012.12.046 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.memsci.2014.04.02310.1016/j.memsci.2014.04.023 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.desal.2010.04.05010.1016/j.desal.2010.04.050 ↗
18. 10.1021/jp207304510.1021/jp2073045 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.desal.2013.08.00210.1016/j.desal.2013.08.002 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.memsci.2012.10.05310.1016/j.memsci.2012.10.053 ↗
21. Huang J. · J. Membr. Sci. · 2012 · 423
22. 10.1016/j.desal.2014.02.02710.1016/j.desal.2014.02.027 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.memsci.2013.07.02610.1016/j.memsci.2013.07.026 ↗
24. 10.1016/S1383-5866(03)00210-710.1016/S1383-5866(03)00210-7 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.memsci.2013.05.02410.1016/j.memsci.2013.05.024 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.desal.2011.09.04510.1016/j.desal.2011.09.045 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2008.07.13910.1016/j.apsusc.2008.07.139 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.desal.2010.12.05210.1016/j.desal.2010.12.052 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.polymer.2008.11.01210.1016/j.polymer.2008.11.012 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.memsci.2014.04.05310.1016/j.memsci.2014.04.053 ↗
31. 10.1021/ie102012v10.1021/ie102012v ↗
32. 10.1016/j.memsci.2008.02.02710.1016/j.memsci.2008.02.027 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.memsci.2011.04.02910.1016/j.memsci.2011.04.029 ↗