Durability of Basalt and Glass Fiber Composites Under Extreme Environments
Source abstract
Abstract
ABSTRACT This study evaluates the durability and mechanical performance of epoxy‐based glass fiber reinforced polymers (GFRP) and basalt fiber reinforced polymers (BFRP) under varying environmental conditions, including rainwater, distilled water, seawater, and acidic water, at temperatures of 35°C and 50°C. Tensile strength, ultimate load capacity, elastic modulus, and their retention rates were measured over 120, 240, and 480 h. Results indicate that BFRP consistently outperforms GFRP in acidic and seawater environments, retaining up to 85% of its tensile strength and modulus even under the harshest conditions at 50°C, compared to GFRP's retention rates of approximately 80%. In rainwater and distilled water, both materials demonstrated minimal degradation, with BFRP exhibiting slightly higher retention. Elevated temperatures accelerated degradation for both materials, with GFRP losing up to 18% of tensile strength and 15% of modulus in acidic environments, whereas BFRP exhibited reductions of 10% and 12%, respectively. These findings underscore the superior chemical and thermal resistance of BFRP, making it a more suitable choice for aggressive environments. This study provides valuable insights into material selection and protective strategies for FRP‐based structural applications in challenging conditions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Analysis of Composite Materials · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Structural Analysis and Optimization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Key Laboratory of C & PC Structures Ministry of Education National and Local Unified Engineering Research Centre for Basalt Fiber Production and Application Technology, Southeast University Nanjing China
School of Civil Engineering, Southeast University Nanjing China
Ningbo Huaqian Technology Co., Ltd. Ningbo City China
References (46)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.jobe.2024.10958810.1016/j.jobe.2024.109588 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.rineng.2024.10233910.1016/j.rineng.2024.102339 ↗
3. 10.3390/buildings1402043910.3390/buildings14020439 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.13726410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.137264 ↗
5. 10.1002/pc.2964710.1002/pc.29647 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.10779210.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.107792 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.12.14810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.12.148 ↗
8. 10.1177/0731684425132699110.1177/07316844251326991 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.11991010.1016/j.engstruct.2025.119910 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jobe.2024.10951210.1016/j.jobe.2024.109512 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.09.04010.1016/j.engstruct.2018.09.040 ↗
12. 10.1007/s41939‐024‐00666‐210.1007/s41939‐024‐00666‐2 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.11985210.1016/j.engstruct.2025.119852 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.13536410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.135364 ↗
15. 10.3390/su16241085310.3390/su162410853 ↗
16. 10.1021/acsomega.0c0277310.1021/acsomega.0c02773 ↗
17. 10.3390/infrastructures910018310.3390/infrastructures9100183 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.09.01510.1016/j.compositesb.2018.09.015 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.13545610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.135456 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2024.10562710.1016/j.cemconcomp.2024.105627 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.firesaf.2020.10317810.1016/j.firesaf.2020.103178 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.11479610.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114796 ↗
23. 10.1023/B:JMSC.0000026956.45427.6810.1023/B:JMSC.0000026956.45427.68 ↗
24. Study on Heat Transfer Characteristics of High Water Cut Crude Oil in FRP Pipeline
25. Ching Y. C. · 2018 · 407
26. M.RobertandB.Benmokrane “Behavior of GFRP Reinforcing Bars Subjected to Extreme Temperatures ”https://doi.org/10.1061/ASCECC.1943‐5614.0000092.
27. 10.1016/j.istruc.2024.10676510.1016/j.istruc.2024.106765 ↗
28. “Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Polymer Matrix Composite Materials 1 ”https://doi.org/10.1520/D3039_D3039M‐1.10.1520/D3039_D3039M ↗
29. 10.1061/(asce)cc.1943‐5614.000118410.1061/(asce)cc.1943‐5614.0001184 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.istruc.2024.10763710.1016/j.istruc.2024.107637 ↗
31. 10.1002/pc.2839310.1002/pc.28393 ↗
32. 10.1155/2024/547203610.1155/2024/5472036 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.03.04310.1016/j.compstruct.2019.03.043 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2022.11000410.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2022.110004 ↗
35. 10.3390/polym1414280410.3390/polym14142804 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12558410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125584 ↗
37. X.Wang L.Jiang H.Shen Z.Wu andF.Asce “Long‐Term Performance of Pultruded Basalt Fiber Reinforced Polymer Profiles Under Acidic Conditions ”2018 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943.10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002293 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11506010.1016/j.compstruct.2021.115060 ↗
39. 10.14190/jrcr.2017.5.1.05310.14190/jrcr.2017.5.1.053 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.04.19810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.04.198 ↗
41. 10.1080/24705314.2016.115332710.1080/24705314.2016.1153327 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.istruc.2021.07.03510.1016/j.istruc.2021.07.035 ↗
43. 10.1061/JCCOF2.CCENG‐470810.1061/JCCOF2.CCENG‐4708 ↗
44. 10.1061/JBENF2.BEENG‐687010.1061/JBENF2.BEENG‐6870 ↗
45. 10.3390/jcs101000310.3390/jcs1010003 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.cscm.2025.e0429910.1016/j.cscm.2025.e04299 ↗