journal article·2025-03-10

Design and development of low‐weight and high‐strength electromagnetic shielding nanocomposite in a microwave frequency range

Rajnish P. Modanwal, S. I. Kundalwal

Polymer Composites· Volume 46· Issue 4
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract In this novel work, we fabricated the multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs)/polypyrrole (PPy) nanocomposite by employing the novel ultrasonic dual mixing (UDM) method. Subsequently, the atomistics and structural characterizations of the fabricated MWCNT/PPy nanocomposite (PM) were performed using SEM, Raman, and XRD. Furthermore, we experimentally evaluated the mechanical properties of the fabricated PM by reinforcing the PPy matrix with MWCNTs at different wt.%. The experimental study of PM shows that the mechanical properties depend upon the amount and dispersion quality of MWCNTs in the PPy matrix. In order to validate the experimental outcomes, the conservative fully coupled finite element (FE) models were developed using the ANSYS Workbench and novel FEAST software. The electromagnetic interference (EMI) shielding effectiveness (SE) of developed PM was also calculated at different thicknesses of PM by taking the effect of SE due to absorption (SEA) and SE reflection (SER) in the microwave frequency range of the C‐band (5.37–8.2 GHz) into consideration. The total SE (SET), the cumulative sum of SEA and SER, is the strong function of the thickness of the PM. Additionally, our study's outcomes reveal that as the thickness of the PM increased, the SET also increased by dominating the SEA rather than the SER. The SET value of 75 dB was observed for a sample with a thickness of 3 mm, indicating a high level of shielding. Thus, material becomes a highly attractive option for achieving high‐performance EMI SE in the C‐band for satellite communications, Wi‐Fi devices, weather radar systems, surveillance, and cordless telephones. A complex permittivity and permeability were also studied using the Nicolson–Ross–Weir (NRW) method to understand the mechanism behind the EMI SE. Highlights Nanocomposite fabricated using the novel ultrasonic dual mixing method. FE models were developed to validate experimental results. The EC and EMI SE are improved with the increase in the sample thickness. Absorption, rather than reflection, dominated the shielding mechanism. SE was observed dB with good mechanical properties.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electromagnetic wave absorption materials · Material Properties and Applications · Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Applied and Theoretical Mechanics Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering Indian Institute of Technology Indore Indore India

References (68)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s10999‐011‐9156‐410.1007/s10999‐011‐9156‐4 ↗
2. 10.1115/1.402369110.1115/1.4023691 ↗
3. 10.1016/S0022‐3697(99)00376‐510.1016/S0022‐3697(99)00376‐5 ↗
4. 10.1115/1.402780110.1115/1.4027801 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2004.11.00310.1016/j.compscitech.2004.11.003 ↗
6. 10.1126/science.106092810.1126/science.1060928 ↗
7. 10.1126/science.106047010.1126/science.1060470 ↗
8. 10.1016/S0266‐3538(01)00094‐X10.1016/S0266‐3538(01)00094‐X ↗
9. 10.1016/S1369‐7021(04)00508‐510.1016/S1369‐7021(04)00508‐5 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2014.06.00210.1016/j.progpolymsci.2014.06.002 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.06.01810.1016/j.compscitech.2008.06.018 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.02.00510.1016/j.compositesb.2011.02.005 ↗
13. ShokriehMM SaeediA ChitsazzadehM.Mechanical properties of multi‐walled carbon nanotube/polyester nanocomposites.2013;3:3‐7.10.1186/2193-8865-3-20 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2010.08.00710.1016/j.compscitech.2010.08.007 ↗
15. 10.1007/s12046‐020‐01539‐310.1007/s12046‐020‐01539‐3 ↗
16. YaoR GeZ WangD ShangN ShiJ.Self‐sensing joints for in‐situ structural health monitoring of composite pipes: A piezoresistive behavior‐based method.2024;308. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2024.11804910.1016/j.engstruct.2024.118049 ↗
17. HeX WengQ GuoR ZhangL ShengX XieD.Elaborate construction of potent antioxidant properties in PBP‐Ce (Ш) nanosheets via a one‐pot approach for seamless integration of anti‐ corrosion wear‐resistance and flame‐retardancy.2024;201:1‐7. doi:10.1016/j.jmst.2024.03.01210.1016/j.jmst.2024.03.012 ↗
18. 10.1016/S0266‐3538(02)00129‐X10.1016/S0266‐3538(02)00129‐X ↗
19. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.04.02110.1016/j.compscitech.2005.04.021 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2011.04.00810.1016/j.polymertesting.2011.04.008 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.10745710.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107457 ↗
22. 10.1021/nn901047210.1021/nn9010472 ↗
23. 10.1177/095400831774902110.1177/0954008317749021 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.msea.2008.04.05110.1016/j.msea.2008.04.051 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.02.00610.1016/j.compositesa.2005.02.006 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.01.00710.1016/j.matdes.2014.01.007 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.11.01010.1016/j.compstruct.2011.11.010 ↗
28. 10.1080/02564602.2005.1165791110.1080/02564602.2005.11657911 ↗
29. 10.1002/pat.100310.1002/pat.1003 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.matdes.2015.08.15610.1016/j.matdes.2015.08.156 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2023.10765210.1016/j.compositesa.2023.107652 ↗
32. 10.1088/1361‐6668/ad2fda10.1088/1361‐6668/ad2fda ↗
33. 10.1002/app.4537010.1002/app.45370 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2008.08.06510.1016/j.matchemphys.2008.08.065 ↗
35. 10.1002/app.4216110.1002/app.42161 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2011.06.01410.1016/j.compscitech.2011.06.014 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.08.03010.1016/j.compositesa.2016.08.030 ↗
38. 10.1007/s11671‐008‐9246‐x10.1007/s11671‐008‐9246‐x ↗
39. 10.1016/j.carbon.2009.02.03010.1016/j.carbon.2009.02.030 ↗
40. 10.1021/am502641h10.1021/am502641h ↗
41. 10.1109/IMICPW.2019.893318010.1109/IMICPW.2019.8933180 ↗
42. 10.37358/MP.21.3.552310.37358/MP.21.3.5523 ↗
43. 10.1002/pc.2555110.1002/pc.25551 ↗
44. 10.1109/LAWP.2011.217589710.1109/LAWP.2011.2175897 ↗
45. 10.2528/PIER1607170610.2528/PIER16071706 ↗
46. 10.3390/c101005810.3390/c1010058 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.synthmet.2012.05.01210.1016/j.synthmet.2012.05.012 ↗
48. 10.1038/s41598‐019‐44900‐110.1038/s41598‐019‐44900‐1 ↗
49. 10.1021/ja035441810.1021/ja0354418 ↗
50. 10.1021/nl025554+10.1021/nl025554+ ↗
51. 10.1186/1556‐276X‐6‐43110.1186/1556‐276X‐6‐431 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2017.09.00510.1016/j.ultsonch.2017.09.005 ↗
53. Effect of thickness on the electrical conductivity and hall effect measurements effect of thickness on the electrical conductivity and hall effect measurements of (CIGS) films
54. 10.1016/B978‐0‐323‐48221‐9.00010‐810.1016/B978‐0‐323‐48221‐9.00010‐8 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.carbon.2011.11.00410.1016/j.carbon.2011.11.004 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2008.03.07710.1016/j.apsusc.2008.03.077 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.carbon.2013.08.04310.1016/j.carbon.2013.08.043 ↗
58. 10.1080/09276440.2017.130220210.1080/09276440.2017.1302202 ↗
59. YuanB YuL ShengL AnK ZhaoX.Comparison of electromagnetic interference shielding properties between single‐wall carbon nanotube and graphene sheet/polyaniline composites. n.d.;45:235108. doi:10.1088/0022‐3727/45/23/23510810.1088/0022-3727/45/23/235108 ↗
60. MannaK SrivastavaSK.Contrasting role of defect‐induced carbon nanotubes in electromagnetic interference shielding.2018. doi:10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b0481310.1021/acs.jpcc.8b04813 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.03.01410.1016/j.compositesb.2014.03.014 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.jpcs.2018.03.00810.1016/j.jpcs.2018.03.008 ↗
63. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.05.00910.1016/j.compositesb.2019.05.009 ↗
64. Microwave absorption of single‐walled carbon nanotubes/soluble cross‐linked polyurethane
65. 10.1088/0957‐4484/22/46/46570110.1088/0957‐4484/22/46/465701 ↗
66. 10.1063/1.320095810.1063/1.3200958 ↗
67. 10.1039/c3ta14212d10.1039/c3ta14212d ↗
68. 10.1021/cm960077f10.1021/cm960077f ↗