journal article·2024-11-10

Effect of nanofibril cellulose empty fruit bunch‐reinforced thermoplastic polyurethane nanocomposites on tensile and dynamic mechanical properties for flexible substrates

N. A. Azzra, A. Atiqah, H. Fadhlina, A. Jalar, M. A. Bakar, A. G. Ismail, A. B. M. Supian

Polymer Composites· Volume 45· Issue 16
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Researchers and scientists have focused on the development and future opportunities of flexible sensors in food, environment and defense fields. In this study, we propose a flexible substrate material‐based nanofibril cellulose empty fruit bunch (NEFB)‐reinforced thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) blend nanocomposite for flexible substrate materials. Untreated and treated nanofibril cellulose samples of empty fruit bunch (NEFB, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 wt. %) were treated with 6 wt.% sodium hydroxide (NaOH) and subjected to internal Brabender mixer followed by a hot‐pressing machine. The density and tensile and dynamic mechanical properties of the nanocomposites were investigated for the treated and untreated samples. Tensile properties were characterized using a Universal Testing Machine, and the fracture mechanism after post‐tensile testing was determined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Increasing the content of untreated NEFB/TPU improved the tensile strength compared with 6% treated NEFB/TPU blend nanocomposites. Incorporating the nanofibril cellulose of empty fruit bunch at 2% into the TPU blend nanocomposites significantly increased E ′, E" and T g compared with other formulations. Highlights Nanocellulose derived from plants is considered a promising material for flexible substrates in electronics due to its robust mechanical properties and eco‐friendliness. Malaysia's abundant empty fruit bunch (EFB) resources make it a possible source of nanocellulose, which improves the properties of polymers. The effect of sodium hydroxide (NaOH) treatment on the compatibility of EFB‐derived nanocellulose with polymer matrices was investigated. The addition of nanocellulose, particularly at a concentration of 1%, significantly increases the tensile strength of thermoplastic polyurethane nanocomposites, whereas 6% NaOH treatment has no effect. Dynamic mechanical analysis reveals high storage modulus at 2% nanofibril cellulose empty fruit bunch (NEFB) and energy dissipation at 4% NEFB as well as enhanced interfacial bonding at 1% NEFB.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Institute of Microengineering and Nanoelectronics Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Bangi Malaysia

Department of Applied Physics, Faculty of Science and Technology Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Bangi Malaysia

Institute of Energy Infrastructure Universiti Tenaga Nasional Jalan IKRAM‐UNITEN Kajang Selangor Malaysia

Funding

Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia

References (51)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.3390/polym1302023110.3390/polym13020231 ↗
2. Recent advancements of plant‐based natural fiber–reinforced composites and their applications
3. Atiqah A · 2022 · 481
4. 10.1002/pc.2623210.1002/pc.26232 ↗
5. 10.1002/pc.2609010.1002/pc.26090 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.12614110.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126141 ↗
7. 10.1002/pc.2537910.1002/pc.25379 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.07.08810.1016/j.jmrt.2023.07.088 ↗
9. 10.1515/psr-2022-001110.1515/psr-2022-0011 ↗
10. 10.1002/macp.20220038310.1002/macp.202200383 ↗
11. Application of biodegradable and biocompatible nanocomposites in electronics: current status and future directions
12. 10.3390/ma1503095710.3390/ma15030957 ↗
13. 10.1002/adfm.20190257910.1002/adfm.201902579 ↗
14. Potential of commercial wood‐based materials as PCB substrate
15. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2022.10102510.1016/j.pmatsci.2022.101025 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.cej.2021.13215210.1016/j.cej.2021.132152 ↗
17. Das PP · 2020 · 311
18. A comprehensive review of hybrid supercapacitor from transition metal and industrial crop based activated carbon for energy storage applications
19. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.14713510.1016/j.apsusc.2020.147135 ↗
20. Preparation and performance of AgNWs/PDMS film‐based flexible strain sensor
21. Awasthi H · 2022
22. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2021.10592110.1016/j.nanoen.2021.105921 ↗
23. 10.1177/073168441880488210.1177/0731684418804882 ↗
24. The effects of unbleached and bleached nanocellulose on the thermal and flammability of polypropylene‐reinforced kenaf core hybrid polymer bionanocomposites
25. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.12.02110.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.12.021 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.jcis.2020.05.01810.1016/j.jcis.2020.05.018 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2022.11912210.1016/j.carbpol.2022.119122 ↗
28. Direct preparation of nanocelluloses of tunable lengths from native wood via alkaline periodate oxidation
29. 10.1002/pen.2589910.1002/pen.25899 ↗
30. 10.14416/j.asep.2022.02.00110.14416/j.asep.2022.02.001 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.09.00210.1016/j.carbpol.2018.09.002 ↗
32. 10.1088/1757‐899X/368/1/01204710.1088/1757‐899X/368/1/012047 ↗
33. 3D printing of UV‐curable polyurethane incorporated with surface‐grafted nanocellulose
34. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.10431610.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.104316 ↗
35. 10.1007/978-981-19-4847-3_410.1007/978-981-19-4847-3_4 ↗
36. 10.1080/15440478.2018.155814210.1080/15440478.2018.1558142 ↗
37. 10.3390/jcs704016810.3390/jcs7040168 ↗
38. 10.35812/CelluloseChemTechnol.2020.54.7810.35812/CelluloseChemTechnol.2020.54.78 ↗
39. 10.1007/s10570-020-03328-x10.1007/s10570-020-03328-x ↗
40. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.10679910.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.106799 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.07.05910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.07.059 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2018.10.01210.1016/j.jmrt.2018.10.012 ↗
43. 10.1002/pat.572710.1002/pat.5727 ↗
44. 10.1002/mame.20200057610.1002/mame.202000576 ↗
45. 10.1201/978042919030810.1201/9780429190308 ↗
46. 10.1039/C7RA13634J10.1039/C7RA13634J ↗
47. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.11.03910.1016/j.compositesb.2018.11.039 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2019.11.08610.1016/j.jmrt.2019.11.086 ↗
49. 10.15376/biores.16.3.5538-555510.15376/biores.16.3.5538-5555 ↗
50. 10.14314/polimery.2021.3.110.14314/polimery.2021.3.1 ↗
51. 10.2174/157341371766621021611560910.2174/1573413717666210216115609 ↗