journal article·2024-06-20

Application of machine learning methods in the analysis of interface bonding strength for overmolded hybrid thermoset‐thermoplastic composites

Yulong Yin, Zhanyu Zhai, Yudong Ding

Polymer Composites· Volume 45· Issue 9
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract The focus of this study is to apply finite element method (FEM) and machine learning methods to investigate the interfacial bonding strength of continuous fiber reinforced thermoset composite (TSC)‐thermoplastic structures manufactured through co‐curing and overmolding processes, with polyamide 6 (PA 6) as the thermoplastic material. A model for interfacial healing degree in TSC‐PA 6 structures was developed. Then, FEM was employed to study the influence of various injection overmolding process parameters on the interfacial bonding strength of TSC‐PA 6 structures. The results show that there is a strong correlation between the degree of interface healing and the bonding strength. Subsequently, six machine learning methods were employed to correlate interfacial healing degree with diverse injection molding process parameters. Simulation data were utilized for training, calibration, and validation of the six machine learning models. Based on the results of simulation and machine learning predictions, a quantitative analysis of the significance of injection molding process parameters on healing degree was conducted. These parameters are ranked in descending order of importance as follows: insert temperature, melt temperature, and injection rate. Highlights The interfacial healing degree model of PA 6 was established and validated through the integration FEM and experiment. Six machine learning models were built to predict the interfacial healing degree. Grad boosting performed best in predicting the interfacial healing degree. Insert temperature had the greatest impact on the interface healing degree.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Epoxy Resin Curing Processes · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Injection Molding Process and Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering Central South University Changsha China

State Key Laboratory of Precision Manufacturing for Extreme Service Performance Central South University Changsha China

Funding

Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province

References (41)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1080/13588265.2016.126755210.1080/13588265.2016.1267552 ↗
2. 10.1007/s41745‐021‐00267‐910.1007/s41745‐021‐00267‐9 ↗
3. 10.1007/s11740‐018‐0825‐010.1007/s11740‐018‐0825‐0 ↗
4. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.825-826.40110.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.825-826.401 ↗
5. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.651-653.145710.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.651-653.1457 ↗
6. 10.1002/pc.2643210.1002/pc.26432 ↗
7. 10.1002/pen.2624410.1002/pen.26244 ↗
8. 10.3390/s2310478410.3390/s23104784 ↗
9. 10.1002/pc.2569310.1002/pc.25693 ↗
10. 10.1177/073168441983807010.1177/0731684419838070 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2021.10742510.1016/j.polymertesting.2021.107425 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2022.10750910.1016/j.polymertesting.2022.107509 ↗
13. 10.1002/pen.2478610.1002/pen.24786 ↗
14. JoppichT MenrathA HenningF.Advanced Molds and Methods for the Fundamental Analysis of Process Induced Interface Bonding Properties of Hybrid Thermoplastic Composites. 1st CIRP Conf. Compos. Mater. Parts Manuf. CIRP CCMPM 2017. 2017; 66: 137–142.10.1016/j.procir.2017.03.275 ↗
15. 10.3389/fmats.2020.0002710.3389/fmats.2020.00027 ↗
16. 10.3390/mi1404087610.3390/mi14040876 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.microrel.2010.10.00810.1016/j.microrel.2010.10.008 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2022.10758010.1016/j.polymertesting.2022.107580 ↗
19. Combining simulation and machine learning as digital twin for the manufacturing of overmolded thermoplastic composites
20. 10.3390/polym1406107410.3390/polym14061074 ↗
21. 10.1002/pc.2681610.1002/pc.26816 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jcomc.2021.10012610.1016/j.jcomc.2021.100126 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.polymer.2023.12573610.1016/j.polymer.2023.125736 ↗
24. 10.1080/19475411.2022.205487810.1080/19475411.2022.2054878 ↗
25. 10.1007/s00170‐021‐07084‐510.1007/s00170‐021‐07084‐5 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.procir.2021.05.00110.1016/j.procir.2021.05.001 ↗
27. 10.1002/app.5348810.1002/app.53488 ↗
28. 10.1021/ja01619a00810.1021/ja01619a008 ↗
29. Scikit‐learn: machine learning in python
30. EsterM KriegelH XuX.XGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system. In Proceedings of the 22Nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (vol pg 785 2016). Geogr Anal 2022.10.1145/2939672.2939785 ↗
31. 10.3390/diagnostics1212318010.3390/diagnostics12123180 ↗
32. 10.3390/jcm1114405910.3390/jcm11144059 ↗
33. 10.2478/jos‐2014‐004910.2478/jos‐2014‐0049 ↗
34. 10.1177/0967033523117313910.1177/09670335231173139 ↗
35. 10.3354/cr03007910.3354/cr030079 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.ins.2021.11.03610.1016/j.ins.2021.11.036 ↗
37. 10.3390/polym1513287910.3390/polym15132879 ↗
38. 10.3390/s2204147710.3390/s22041477 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.psep.2022.10.00510.1016/j.psep.2022.10.005 ↗
40. 10.1007/BF0005865510.1007/BF00058655 ↗
41. 10.32604/cmc.2022.01988210.32604/cmc.2022.019882 ↗