journal article·2024-02-20

Effect of symmetric and asymmetric aluminum arrangements on the low‐velocity impact performance of glass fiber‐reinforced aluminum laminate (GLARE)

Jipeng Zhang, Huadong Wang, Yue Wang, Xiangjun Dai, Peng Wang, Guodong Fang

Polymer Composites· Volume 45· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Glass fiber‐reinforced aluminum laminate (GLARE) possesses superior impact performance than both metal and fiber‐reinforced composite. It was found previously that the low‐velocity impact (LVI) performance of GLARE is governed by aluminum at different locations. This implies that reasonably rearranging aluminum in GLARE may bring in some improvements if the functions of different aluminum are all fully played. In this view, the effect of aluminum arrangement on the LVI performance of GLARE was investigated by separately comparing eight symmetric and eight asymmetric GLARE. Finite element analysis was adopted due to its advantage in quantitatively capturing the detailed damage parameters, and it was verified by LVI tests under different impact energy. The LVI performance was elucidated from both impact resistance and energy absorption aspects, where the former included the force and damage responses, and the latter involved the energy absorbed ratio and absorption efficiency. Based on the mechanical and damage parameters, impact resistance and energy absorption factors were proposed for comprehensive characterization. It revealed that arranging aluminum symmetrically in GLARE by placing thinner aluminum in the middle is an effective way to improve its LVI performance. Highlights Aluminum arrangement influenced evidently on the low‐velocity impact (LVI) damage degrees of glass fiber‐reinforced aluminum laminate (GLARE). Impact resistance and energy absorption factors were quantitively defined. Symmetric GLARE with thinner middle aluminum had superior LVI performance. Optimal aluminum arrangement could be simply estimated by energy dissipation.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Cellular and Composite Structures · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Transportation and Vehicle Engineering Shandong University of Technology Zibo China

School of Materials Science and Engineering Shandong University of Technology Zibo China

Science and Technology on Advanced Ceramic Fibers and Composites Laboratory National University of Defense Technology Changsha China

Shandong Industrial Ceramics Research & Design institute Co., Ltd. Zibo China

Institute of Engineering Ceramics Shandong University of Technology Zibo China

National Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on Advanced Composites in Special Environments Harbin Institute of Technology Harbin China

Funding

Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province · National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (73)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/978-94-010-0995-910.1007/978-94-010-0995-9 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.matdes.2011.03.01110.1016/j.matdes.2011.03.011 ↗
3. 10.1002/pc.2325610.1002/pc.23256 ↗
4. 10.1002/pc.2708210.1002/pc.27082 ↗
5. 10.1080/09276440.2022.212073910.1080/09276440.2022.2120739 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.01.00910.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.01.009 ↗
7. 10.1007/s00170-018-1627-410.1007/s00170-018-1627-4 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.09.08510.1016/j.compositesb.2018.09.085 ↗
9. 10.1016/0734-743X(96)89050-610.1016/0734-743X(96)89050-6 ↗
10. 10.1002/pc.2686710.1002/pc.26867 ↗
11. 10.1002/pc.2771610.1002/pc.27716 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.tws.2020.10695210.1016/j.tws.2020.106952 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.acme.2014.09.00710.1016/j.acme.2014.09.007 ↗
14. 10.1002/pc.2650910.1002/pc.26509 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.05.03510.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.05.035 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11231910.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112319 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2021.10760810.1016/j.engfracmech.2021.107608 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2012.05.00610.1016/j.ijimpeng.2012.05.006 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2014.01.00410.1016/j.ijimpeng.2014.01.004 ↗
20. 10.1002/pc.2713610.1002/pc.27136 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.tws.2021.10802610.1016/j.tws.2021.108026 ↗
22. Impact responses of sandwich panels with fibre metal laminate skins and aluminum foam core10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.09.015 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11346110.1016/j.compstruct.2020.113461 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.tws.2022.10893210.1016/j.tws.2022.108932 ↗
25. 10.1080/15376494.2020.181801210.1080/15376494.2020.1818012 ↗
26. 10.1080/15376494.2021.197461810.1080/15376494.2021.1974618 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.tws.2022.10923610.1016/j.tws.2022.109236 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11239810.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112398 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2012.04.00810.1016/j.compositesa.2012.04.008 ↗
30. 10.1007/s10443-011-9235-610.1007/s10443-011-9235-6 ↗
31. 10.1080/15376494.2016.116234310.1080/15376494.2016.1162343 ↗
32. 10.1002/pc.2642110.1002/pc.26421 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.09.05410.1016/j.compstruct.2014.09.054 ↗
34. 10.1002/pc.2326610.1002/pc.23266 ↗
35. 10.1177/002199831771956910.1177/0021998317719569 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.tws.2022.11044110.1016/j.tws.2022.110441 ↗
37. 10.1177/002199830606529110.1177/0021998306065291 ↗
38. Experimental and numerical analysis of drop‐weight low‐velocity impact tests on hybrid titanium composite laminates
39. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2022.10434210.1016/j.ijimpeng.2022.104342 ↗
40. 10.3390/ma1301010310.3390/ma13010103 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2022.10987110.1016/j.compscitech.2022.109871 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.12.03310.1016/j.compstruct.2016.12.033 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2022.10964110.1016/j.compscitech.2022.109641 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11315110.1016/j.compstruct.2020.113151 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2020.10626710.1016/j.compositesa.2020.106267 ↗
46. 10.1002/pc.2437310.1002/pc.24373 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.11537110.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115371 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.11534010.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115340 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.tws.2021.10816210.1016/j.tws.2021.108162 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.ast.2017.03.04210.1016/j.ast.2017.03.042 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.01.05210.1016/j.compstruct.2018.01.052 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.tws.2021.10803310.1016/j.tws.2021.108033 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.ast.2018.11.03810.1016/j.ast.2018.11.038 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.11096110.1016/j.compstruct.2019.110961 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2022.10693010.1016/j.compositesa.2022.106930 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.coco.2022.10114810.1016/j.coco.2022.101148 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.11536810.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115368 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.12.01610.1016/j.compstruct.2012.12.016 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.mechmat.2013.06.00710.1016/j.mechmat.2013.06.007 ↗
60. 10.1177/002199831037610810.1177/0021998310376108 ↗
61. Finite element analysis of dynamic progressive failure properties of GLARE hybrid laminates under low‐velocity impact
62. 10.1016/j.tws.2019.10632110.1016/j.tws.2019.106321 ↗
63. 10.1016/j.tws.2022.11035510.1016/j.tws.2022.110355 ↗
64. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.03.00510.1016/j.compositesa.2011.03.005 ↗
65. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.06.01010.1016/j.compstruct.2014.06.010 ↗
66. 10.1080/13588265.2020.177761910.1080/13588265.2020.1777619 ↗
67. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2017.12.00110.1016/j.polymertesting.2017.12.001 ↗
68. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2018.04.01110.1016/j.ijimpeng.2018.04.011 ↗
69. 10.1002/pc.2059410.1002/pc.20594 ↗
70. 10.1115/1.315366410.1115/1.3153664 ↗
71. 10.1016/j.tws.2019.10632510.1016/j.tws.2019.106325 ↗
72. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.10.03310.1016/j.compstruct.2013.10.033 ↗
73. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.04.01710.1016/j.compstruct.2017.04.017 ↗