Toward Antibacterial Coatings for Personalized Implants
Source abstract
Abstract
The complex reconstructive surgeries for which patient-specific orthopedic, maxillofacial, or dental implants are used often necessitate wounds that are open for a considerable amount of time. Unsurprisingly, this allows bacteria to establish implant-associated infection, despite the scrupulous sterilization efforts made during surgery. Here, we developed a prophylactic bactericidal coating via electrophoretic deposition technology for two 3D-printed porous titanium implant designs. The surface characteristics, antibiotic release behavior, antibacterial properties, and impact on osteoblast cell proliferation of the optimized coatings were investigated. The results unequivocally confirmed the biofunctionality of the implants in vitro. This study reveals a new avenue for future antibacterial patient-specific implants.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Orthopedics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht 3584 CX, The Netherlands
Department of Medical Microbiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht 3584 CX, The Netherlands
Amber Implants B.V., Delft 2629 JD, The Netherlands
Department of Pharmaceutics, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences (UIPS), Utrecht University, Utrecht 3584 CS, The Netherlands
Funding
Health~Holland
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1126/science.284.5418.131810.1126/science.284.5418.1318 ↗
2. 10.1128/JCM.37.6.1771-1776.199910.1128/JCM.37.6.1771-1776.1999 ↗
3. 10.1016/S2589-7500(19)30067-610.1016/S2589-7500(19)30067-6 ↗
4. 10.1007/s40121-017-0146-110.1007/s40121-017-0146-1 ↗
5. 10.1186/s12891-017-1742-710.1186/s12891-017-1742-7 ↗
6. 10.1038/s41413-018-0032-910.1038/s41413-018-0032-9 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.12.02710.1016/j.carbpol.2014.12.027 ↗
8. 10.1021/am200891f10.1021/am200891f ↗
9. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b0030610.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b00306 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.addma.2019.10099110.1016/j.addma.2019.100991 ↗
11. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b0118410.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b01184 ↗
12. 10.1039/C8TB01363B10.1039/C8TB01363B ↗
13. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b0085910.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b00859 ↗
14. 10.1039/C7TB02445B10.1039/C7TB02445B ↗
15. 10.1007/s10439-016-1719-y10.1007/s10439-016-1719-y ↗
16. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b0033210.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b00332 ↗
17. 10.1021/acsami.7b0495010.1021/acsami.7b04950 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.09.05110.1016/j.actbio.2018.09.051 ↗
19. 10.1089/ten.tea.2014.047610.1089/ten.tea.2014.0476 ↗
20. 10.1002/mabi.20150000510.1002/mabi.201500005 ↗
21. 10.3109/10717544.2012.74640210.3109/10717544.2012.746402 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2019.02.07510.1016/j.surfcoat.2019.02.075 ↗
23. 10.3389/fmed.2019.0014910.3389/fmed.2019.00149 ↗
24. 10.1302/0301-620X.97B2.3455410.1302/0301-620X.97B2.34554 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2019.01.00110.1016/j.pmatsci.2019.01.001 ↗
26. 10.1021/bm401021b10.1021/bm401021b ↗
27. 10.1016/j.matlet.2018.12.04210.1016/j.matlet.2018.12.042 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.msec.2015.04.03110.1016/j.msec.2015.04.031 ↗
29. 10.1002/adem.20110034410.1002/adem.201100344 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.addma.2019.06.01410.1016/j.addma.2019.06.014 ↗
31. 10.1002/adem.20180114010.1002/adem.201801140 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.09.01910.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.09.019 ↗
33. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.7b0054410.1021/acsbiomaterials.7b00544 ↗
34. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b0017310.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b00173 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.01.07110.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.01.071 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.10.00110.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.10.001 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.11973710.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119737 ↗