journal article·2023-01

In‐plane mechanical properties of thick‐walled polymer‐filled honeycomb composites: Analysis and experiments

Carson Squibb, Masaki Hada, Michael Philen

Polymer Composites· Volume 44· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Polymer‐filled honeycomb composites are composite materials that exhibit effective in‐plane moduli greater than either the honeycomb or polymer alone. Previous numerical modeling work by the authors has identified two key mechanisms by which this stiffness amplification is achieved. For thin honeycomb cells, the difference in Poisson's ratio between the infill and honeycomb drives the in‐plane composite behavior. For large cell depths, the volume change of the hexagonal cells, acting on the infill polymer, is the dominant factor in stiffness amplification. This work aims to extend these findings to thick walled honeycombs, and to experimentally validate the model predictions while making comparisons to existing analytic models. A unit cell finite element model is created for the composite, with isotropic material properties for the honeycomb and infill obtained from characterization tests on 3D printed honeycomb wall material and polyurethane elastomer infill materials. An experimental investigation is completed, where both empty and polymer filled honeycomb samples are 3D printed and tested for a range of cell geometries, varying the cell angle, cell depth, and infill polymer, and are testing in two in‐plane loading directions. The results support both the model predictions of the effective Young's moduli and the mechanisms of stiffness amplification previously found, with a maximum percent error of 16.9% found and an amplification factor of the infill modulus of up 16 demonstrated. The improved understanding demonstrated in this work supports the use of these composites in applications where reinforcement of the honeycomb by a polymer, or vice versa, is desired.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Polymer composites and self-healing · Mechanical Behavior of Composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Aerospace and Ocean Engineering Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Blacksburg Virginia USA

References (25)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2017.04.00910.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2017.04.009 ↗
2. Olympio K. · J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. · 2010 · 21
3. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.01.02710.1016/j.compositesb.2018.01.027 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2007.08.00710.1016/j.compstruct.2007.08.007 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.enganabound.2020.04.01210.1016/j.enganabound.2020.04.012 ↗
6. 10.1106/10567890202724710.1106/105678902027247 ↗
7. Sadowski T. · Comput Mater Sci · 2011 · 50 · 4
8. 10.1002/pc.2633310.1002/pc.26333 ↗
9. 10.1002/pc.2625210.1002/pc.26252 ↗
10. 10.1177/1045389X1037877710.1177/1045389X10378777 ↗
11. Beblo R. · Conf Smart Mater Adap Struct Intel Sys · 2012 · 2012
12. Cheng Q. · Chin. J. Aeronaut · 2016 · 30 · 766
13. 10.1016/0010-4361(79)90021-110.1016/0010-4361(79)90021-1 ↗
14. 10.1017/CBO978113987832610.1017/CBO9781139878326 ↗
15. 10.1016/S0263-8223(96)00054-210.1016/S0263-8223(96)00054-2 ↗
16. 10.1115/1.142539410.1115/1.1425394 ↗
17. 10.1007/BF0035035410.1007/BF00350354 ↗
18. 10.1088/0964-1726/24/2/02501910.1088/0964-1726/24/2/025019 ↗
19. 10.1177/0021998321105478210.1177/00219983211054782 ↗
20. 10.1177/1045389X1243963610.1177/1045389X12439636 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.11.01910.1016/j.matdes.2018.11.019 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.05.00110.1016/j.compstruct.2017.05.001 ↗
23. 10.1007/s10443-020-09837-z10.1007/s10443-020-09837-z ↗
24. Dassault Systemes Abaqus 6.13 Online Documentation (2013).
25. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2007.08.00910.1016/j.compstruct.2007.08.009 ↗