journal article·2024-12-20Open access

Numerical prediction strategy of fabric in‐plane permeability considering realistic inter‐ and intra‐tow geometry

Long Cheng, Junzhen Chen, Scott E. Stapleton, Yongkang Wang, Jianjun Jiang, Yujun Li

Polymer Composites· Volume 45· Issue 18

Abstract

Abstract Permeability quantifies the flow conductivity of fabric reinforcements and is key to predicting mold filling times and resin flow in liquid composite molding (LCM). Flow depends on the micron‐level channels within the tows and the millimeter‐level channels between them. This study presents a general multi‐scale permeability prediction framework for fabrics considering realistic inter‐ and intra‐tow geometry. A misaligned fiber representative volume element model was constructed by a random perturbation method at the micro‐scale with orientation parameters identified from microscopic images of the cross‐section. At the meso‐scale, a tow cross‐section wrapping algorithm and an interference elimination algorithm were proposed to construct continuous as‐woven tows from the virtual fiber compression simulation. The governing fluid dynamics equations were solved to obtain the flow field within the multi‐scale gaps and compute the permeability. The simplified model's permeability predictions differed from experimental results by 12.7% to 16%. This work provides valuable insights for further research and development in LCM. Highlights Fabric permeability framework considers realistic tow geometry for prediction. Microscale misaligned fiber SVE model predicts tow permeability. Adaptive winding & interference algorithms aid tow description transition. A simplified model predicts permeability reasonably without 3D measurements.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Textile materials and evaluations · Material Properties and Processing · Mechanical Behavior of Composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Mechanical Engineering Northwestern Polytechnical University Xi'an China

Shaanxi Engineering Research Center for Digital Manufacturing Technology Northwestern Polytechnical University Xi'an China

Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Massachusetts Lowell Lowell Massachusetts USA

Research & Development Institute of Northwestern Polytechnical University Shenzhen China

Funding

Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation of Guangdong Province · Key Research and Development Projects of Shaanxi Province · Chinese Aeronautical Establishment · China Postdoctoral Science Foundation

References (72)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.10551910.1016/j.compositesa.2019.105519 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11368510.1016/j.compstruct.2021.113685 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2021.12185610.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2021.121856 ↗
4. 10.1016/S0017-9310(00)00335-510.1016/S0017-9310(00)00335-5 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2020.10611910.1016/j.compositesa.2020.106119 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.03.00610.1016/j.compositesa.2019.03.006 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.03.00410.1016/j.compositesa.2019.03.004 ↗
8. 10.1002/nme.716110.1002/nme.7161 ↗
9. 10.1007/s40192-022-00268-110.1007/s40192-022-00268-1 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2022.10731910.1016/j.compositesa.2022.107319 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.10732010.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107320 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2022.10697310.1016/j.compositesa.2022.106973 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.08.01010.1016/j.compstruct.2017.08.010 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2019.03.02310.1016/j.compscitech.2019.03.023 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2021.10375110.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2021.103751 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2019.10779310.1016/j.compscitech.2019.107793 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.03.01210.1016/j.compositesa.2015.03.012 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2021.10887910.1016/j.compscitech.2021.108879 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.11537410.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115374 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2017.12.02410.1016/j.compositesa.2017.12.024 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.12.03210.1016/j.compositesa.2018.12.032 ↗
22. 10.1016/B978-0-12-819005-0.00008-310.1016/B978-0-12-819005-0.00008-3 ↗
23. 10.1016/B978-0-12-819005-0.00007-110.1016/B978-0-12-819005-0.00007-1 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.11649610.1016/j.compstruct.2022.116496 ↗
25. 10.1016/S0266-3538(03)00258-610.1016/S0266-3538(03)00258-6 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.05.05710.1016/j.compstruct.2013.05.057 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2022.10969110.1016/j.compscitech.2022.109691 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2021.10870610.1016/j.compscitech.2021.108706 ↗
29. Numerical modeling of 3D woven composite reinforcements: a review10.1016/j.compositesa.2021.106729 ↗
30. In‐operando dynamic visualization of flow through porous preforms based on X‐ray phase contrast imaging10.1016/j.compositesa.2021.106560 ↗
31. 10.1007/s11242-018-1186-z10.1007/s11242-018-1186-z ↗
32. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2020.10613110.1016/j.compositesa.2020.106131 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2020.10141910.1016/j.mtcomm.2020.101419 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11367610.1016/j.compstruct.2021.113676 ↗
35. Benchmark exercise on image‐based permeability determination of engineering textiles: Microscale predictions10.1016/j.compositesa.2022.107397 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2021.10867910.1016/j.compscitech.2021.108679 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.11640110.1016/j.compstruct.2022.116401 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2009.10.00910.1016/j.ijimpeng.2009.10.009 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.10.01510.1016/j.compstruct.2013.10.015 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.11550510.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115505 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2017.06.02710.1016/j.ijsolstr.2017.06.027 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2016.11.00310.1016/j.compscitech.2016.11.003 ↗
43. 10.1007/s00707-013-1069-x10.1007/s00707-013-1069-x ↗
44. Geodict. Fraunhofer‐IWTM Germany.https://www.itwm.fraunhofer.de/en.html
45. 10.1177/0040517521105051710.1177/00405175211050517 ↗
46. International Organization for Standardization.ISO 4410:2023(E) Test methods for the experimental characterization of in‐plane permeability of fibrous reinforcements for liquid composite moulding.2023.
47. 10.1016/0301-9322(88)90006-710.1016/0301-9322(88)90006-7 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.11127210.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111272 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.mechmat.2015.10.00210.1016/j.mechmat.2015.10.002 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.11.03910.1016/j.compstruct.2015.11.039 ↗
51. 10.1177/002199831774795410.1177/0021998317747954 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2012.07.02010.1016/j.compositesa.2012.07.020 ↗
53. Fiber‐level numerical simulation of biaxial braids for mesoscopic morphology prediction validated by X‐ray computed tomography scan10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.108938 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.06.00910.1016/j.compscitech.2018.06.009 ↗
55. 10.1103/PhysRevE.83.04180410.1103/PhysRevE.83.041804 ↗
56. 10.1007/s00466-019-01693-410.1007/s00466-019-01693-4 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11243810.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112438 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.cma.2008.02.00910.1016/j.cma.2008.02.009 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.07.00510.1016/j.compstruct.2014.07.005 ↗
60. 10.1177/00219983920260080210.1177/002199839202600802 ↗
61. CarmanPC.Flow of gases through porous media.1956.
62. 10.1143/JPSJ.14.52710.1143/JPSJ.14.527 ↗
63. 10.1002/pc.75014040710.1002/pc.750140407 ↗
64. An attempt to quantify fibre bed permeability utilizing the phase average Navier‐stokes equation
65. 10.1177/002199830504643810.1177/0021998305046438 ↗
66. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11210110.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112101 ↗
67. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2017.10.02010.1016/j.compositesa.2017.10.020 ↗
68. Permeability and capillary effects in a channel‐wise non‐crimp fabric
69. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.02.01810.1016/j.compositesa.2019.02.018 ↗
70. StamatopoulosG ModiD LiraC PantelelisN StojkovicM.Development of a procedure for accurate simulation of the resin transfer moulding process. ECCM18—18th European Conference on Composite Materials.2018.
71. 10.1007/s13272-011-0032-610.1007/s13272-011-0032-6 ↗
72. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.10.03110.1016/j.compscitech.2005.10.031 ↗