journal article·2024-10-20Open access

Process optimization of continuous aramid fiber reinforced PA12 filaments and printed composites

Xibin Jiang, Zhongde Shan, Yong Zang, Feng Liu, Xiaochuan Wu, Ailing Zou, Xiaojun Liu

Polymer Composites· Volume 45· Issue 15

Abstract

Abstract A multi‐stage fiber spreading process for the preparation of high‐performance continuous aramid fiber reinforced nylon 12 (CAF/PA12) composites was proposed in this paper. The effects of spreading rod crown radius, spreading rod axis height and traction speed on fiber impregnation effect and filaments properties were investigated. The fiber volume fraction of the prepared filament was approximately 30%. And the maximum tensile strength and modulus of the filaments were 839.89 MPa and 41.35 GPa, which were 34.36% and 34.30% higher than unspreading filaments, respectively. The influences of printing process parameters such as printing temperature, the combination of layer thickness and printing spacing on the transverse tensile properties of the specimens were studied. Printed specimens reached a transverse tensile strength and tensile modulus of 13.988 MPa and 1.293 GPa, respectively. The influences on low velocity impact properties of the specimens were also investigated in terms of impact energy and printing stacking sequences. Results revealed that the impact threshold energy of orthotropic ([0/90/0/90]2) specimens was 50 J. Quasi‐isotropic ([0/45/90/−45]2) specimens exhibited the superior impact resistance with an impact load of 4.939 kN. Macro‐ and micro‐matrix crack, surface buckling, fiber fracture and delamination were the main failure modes of the specimens. Highlights A novel thermoplastic composite filament forming process was proposed, and the filament forming equipment was designed and manufactured. Continuous aramid fiber‐reinforced PA12 filaments with about 30% fiber content were prepared by orthogonal tests under different forming process conditions, which showed maximum tensile properties of 839.89 MPa and 41.35 GPa, respectively. Spreading multiplication was positively related to filament tensile properties, which was major affected by the axial height of the spreading rod. Transverse tensile strength (13.988 MPa tensile strength and 1.293 GPa tensile modulus) of printed specimens was investigated under different printing parameters. Fiber orientation had a significant effect on the low‐velocity impact properties. Micro‐ and macro‐matrix crack, surface buckling, fiber fracture and delamination were the main failure modes of the low‐velocity impact specimens.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Manufacturing Process and Optimization · Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Mechanical Engineering University of Science and Technology Beijing Beijing China

State Key Laboratory of Advanced Forming Technology and Equipment China Academy of Machinery Science and Technology Beijing China

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China

References (42)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.coco.2021.10090710.1016/j.coco.2021.100907 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.11045010.1016/j.compositesb.2022.110450 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.addma.2019.10096210.1016/j.addma.2019.100962 ↗
4. 10.1038/srep2305810.1038/srep23058 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.05.03210.1016/j.compositesa.2016.05.032 ↗
6. 10.1108/RPJ-08-2015-009810.1108/RPJ-08-2015-0098 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.04.05410.1016/j.compositesb.2018.04.054 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.tws.2021.10771710.1016/j.tws.2021.107717 ↗
9. 10.1002/pc.2625510.1002/pc.26255 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.09.00110.1016/j.compositesa.2018.09.001 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.07.02510.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.07.025 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.10714710.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107147 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.addma.2019.10092610.1016/j.addma.2019.100926 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2020.10577010.1016/j.compositesa.2020.105770 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.03.02010.1016/j.compositesa.2019.03.020 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2020.10598510.1016/j.compositesa.2020.105985 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.10927710.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109277 ↗
18. 10.1177/168781401983569810.1177/1687814019835698 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.04.00210.1016/j.compositesa.2019.04.002 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.addma.2022.10286010.1016/j.addma.2022.102860 ↗
21. 10.1007/s10853-017-1624-210.1007/s10853-017-1624-2 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11497510.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114975 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.addma.2021.10211210.1016/j.addma.2021.102112 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.09.00510.1016/j.jmrt.2022.09.005 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2022.10934110.1016/j.compscitech.2022.109341 ↗
26. Prepreg preparation and 3D printing of continuous carbon fiber reinforced nylon composite
27. Effect of process parameters on tensile properties of 3D printed continuous aramid fiber reinforced nylon 12 composites
28. 10.1088/1742-6596/2087/1/01201310.1088/1742-6596/2087/1/012013 ↗
29. 10.1002/pc.2755910.1002/pc.27559 ↗
30. 10.1016/S0263-8223(03)00114-410.1016/S0263-8223(03)00114-4 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2011.11.00910.1016/j.ijimpeng.2011.11.009 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.03.04410.1016/j.matdes.2013.03.044 ↗
33. Effect of repeated impacts on the response of plain‐woven hybrid composites.Composites part B
34. 10.1016/0734-743X(94)00039-Y10.1016/0734-743X(94)00039-Y ↗
35. 10.1016/S0263-8223(03)00027-810.1016/S0263-8223(03)00027-8 ↗
36. Low‐velocity impact properties and failure mechanism of carbon fiber‐UHMWPE fiber hybrid reinforced epoxy resin composites
37. 10.1002/pc.2776010.1002/pc.27760 ↗
38. Experimental research on the impact properties of aramid/UHMWPE fiber hybrid composite laminates
39. 10.1080/00405000.2020.177822310.1080/00405000.2020.1778223 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.12.01610.1016/j.matdes.2012.12.016 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2008.02.00310.1016/j.compstruct.2008.02.003 ↗
42. 10.1002/pc.2730210.1002/pc.27302 ↗