Behaviors of arched tunneling segments reinforced by basalt fiber reinforced plastic rebars
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract In this research, basalt fiber reinforced plastic (BFRP) rebars reinforced tunneling segment (BRRTS) technique was developed. All the BFRP rebars were designed, pre‐cured according to the reinforcement design and the reinforcement drawing of steel rebars reinforced concrete tunneling segments (SRRTSs). Two criteria, the equal reinforcement ratio criterion (ERRC) and the half stiffness principle (HSP), were applied to design the BRRTs. Bending experiments were performed to reveal the deformation, damage and load carrying capacity of the BRRTSs. With flexural‐shearing coupling failure mode, the BRRTS has longer elastoplastic deformation and comparable (ERRC) or much greater (HSP) load carrying capacity compared with traditional SRRTS, indicating that the BRRTS can replace the SRRTS in some cases. Highlights BFRP rebars reinforced tunneling segment was designed, constructed, and tested. BFRP rebars reinforced tunneling segment has long ductile deformation. BFRP rebars reinforced tunneling segment has higher load‐bearing capacity. Utilization efficiency of BFRP rebars varies from 0.565 to 0.646.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
College of Mechanics and Materials Hohai University Nanjing China
Rocket Force University of Engineering Xi'an China
Research Center of Lightweight Structures and Intelligent Manufacturing Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Nanjing China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12508110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125081 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.12755410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.127554 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.undsp.2021.11.00910.1016/j.undsp.2021.11.009 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.undsp.2021.07.00610.1016/j.undsp.2021.07.006 ↗
5. 10.1002/pc.2782810.1002/pc.27828 ↗
6. 10.1002/pc.2628610.1002/pc.26286 ↗
7. 10.1002/pc.2651110.1002/pc.26511 ↗
8. 10.3390/jcs606015710.3390/jcs6060157 ↗
9. 10.3390/jcs606016910.3390/jcs6060169 ↗
10. 10.3390/fire604013510.3390/fire6040135 ↗
11. 10.3390/jcs611033810.3390/jcs6110338 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.tust.2016.07.01110.1016/j.tust.2016.07.011 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.08.08310.1016/j.compstruct.2017.08.083 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.tust.2019.01.01610.1016/j.tust.2019.01.016 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.tust.2020.10366910.1016/j.tust.2020.103669 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.12.03810.1016/j.compositesb.2017.12.038 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.tust.2020.10361210.1016/j.tust.2020.103612 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.undsp.2022.02.00410.1016/j.undsp.2022.02.004 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.11725410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117254 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.dt.2020.03.01510.1016/j.dt.2020.03.015 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2020.10500310.1016/j.engfailanal.2020.105003 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.dt.2021.03.02410.1016/j.dt.2021.03.024 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11286410.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112864 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.tust.2020.10373110.1016/j.tust.2020.103731 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.undsp.2021.07.00410.1016/j.undsp.2021.07.004 ↗