Low‐velocity impact response and post‐impact assessment of self‐healing composites with different stacking configurations of core–shell nanofibers
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract This work investigates the low‐velocity impact (LVI) and self‐healing behavior of carbon fiber composite laminates interlaced with electrospun polyacrylonitrile core–shell nanofibers (PAN@CFRP). The main goal is to investigate the influence of different stacking configurations of core–shell nanofibers on the impact resistance and self‐healing properties of composite laminates. To achieve the purpose, three different stacking configurations were designed and tested alongside virgin specimens. The damage mechanism and self‐healing of laminates following LVI were determined using ultrasonic C‐scan and cross‐sectional microscopy examinations. At an impact energy of 14.1 J, the flexural strength of the post‐healing PAN‐3@CFRP specimen reached 95.0% of the initial value, whereas at an impact energy of 21.8 J, severe impact damage was observed in the laminates with different configurations. Among the laminates, the PAN‐1@CFRP specimen had the highest flexural strength after healing, which reached 80.1% of its pre‐impact strength. As observed, the impact resistance and self‐healing capacity of composites could be significantly enhanced by optimizing the distribution configuration of core–shell nanofibers for various impact energies. Highlights The introduction of electrospun core–shell nanofibers has not significantly compromised the mechanical properties of the composites, but rather enhanced their toughness. The addition of core–shell nanofibers significantly enhances the impact resistance of the composites and imparts excellent self‐healing properties to the material. The flexural strength of impact‐damaged specimens with different stacking configurations can be restored up to 95% of the undamaged specimen after repair treatment. Significantly improved impact resistance and self‐healing ability of laminates by optimizing the distribution configuration of core–shell nanofibers between composite layers.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Polymer composites and self-healing · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Materials Science and Engineering Wuhan University of Technology Wuhan China
Jiangshan Heavy Industries Research Institute Co., Ltd China North Industries Group Corporation Limited Xiangyang China
Funding
National Key Research and Development Program of China
References (47)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.paerosci.2005.02.00410.1016/j.paerosci.2005.02.004 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.11046310.1016/j.compositesb.2022.110463 ↗
3. 10.1002/pc.2622310.1002/pc.26223 ↗
4. 10.1002/pc.2659310.1002/pc.26593 ↗
5. 10.1016/S1359-835X(00)00061-010.1016/S1359-835X(00)00061-0 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2009.09.00110.1016/j.compscitech.2009.09.001 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.10547710.1016/j.compositesa.2019.105477 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.10551010.1016/j.compositesa.2019.105510 ↗
9. 10.1002/pc.2500210.1002/pc.25002 ↗
10. 10.1002/pc.2756110.1002/pc.27561 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.10805310.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108053 ↗
12. 10.1002/pc.2763610.1002/pc.27636 ↗
13. 10.1002/pc.2700010.1002/pc.27000 ↗
14. 10.1038/3505723210.1038/35057232 ↗
15. 10.1002/pc.2762310.1002/pc.27623 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2015.08.01510.1016/j.compscitech.2015.08.015 ↗
17. 10.1002/pc.2614710.1002/pc.26147 ↗
18. 10.1002/pc.2730410.1002/pc.27304 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2007.01.01310.1016/j.compositesa.2007.01.013 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2023.11015810.1016/j.compscitech.2023.110158 ↗
21. 10.1002/pc.2732710.1002/pc.27327 ↗
22. 10.1002/pc.2550710.1002/pc.25507 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2009.11.00210.1016/j.compositesa.2009.11.002 ↗
24. 10.1002/pc.2608310.1002/pc.26083 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.09.02310.1016/j.compstruct.2013.09.023 ↗
26. 10.1002/pc.2754310.1002/pc.27543 ↗
27. 10.1002/pc.2757110.1002/pc.27571 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.08.05010.1016/j.compstruct.2017.08.050 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2020.10615110.1016/j.compositesa.2020.106151 ↗
30. 10.1002/pc.2660510.1002/pc.26605 ↗
31. 10.1002/app.4495610.1002/app.44956 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.jiec.2017.11.00710.1016/j.jiec.2017.11.007 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2017.06.01610.1016/j.polymertesting.2017.06.016 ↗
34. 10.1002/pc.2598810.1002/pc.25988 ↗
35. 10.1002/pc.2749610.1002/pc.27496 ↗
36. 10.1002/pc.2605810.1002/pc.26058 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2022.10957710.1016/j.compscitech.2022.109577 ↗
38. 10.1002/pc.2733210.1002/pc.27332 ↗
39. ASTM‐D7136 · 2015
40. ASTM‐D790 · 2017
41. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.11.04110.1016/j.compositesa.2015.11.041 ↗
42. 10.1016/S0263-8223(03)00114-410.1016/S0263-8223(03)00114-4 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.11.00810.1016/j.compositesa.2018.11.008 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2006.03.00910.1016/j.compositesb.2006.03.009 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.10697510.1016/j.compositesb.2019.106975 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.01.02510.1016/j.compositesa.2015.01.025 ↗
47. 10.1002/pc.2781010.1002/pc.27810 ↗