Fatigue damage propagation of FRP under coupling effect of cyclic load and corrosion
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Interlaminar fracture or delamination is one of the major failure modes for fiber reinforced polymer (FRP) laminate. Especially, the synergistic effect of environmental exposure and fatigue loads accelerates interface degradation. The main objective in this work was to investigate the fatigue damage propagation of basalt FRP (BFRP) laminate under coupling of acidic environment and fatigue load. The fatigue cycling of 40,000 and the maximum stress of 30% f u ( f u = ultimate tensile strength) were adopted. The fatigue specimens under air condition (air fatigue), immersing in water (water fatigue) and immersing in acid (acid fatigue) were introduced. The double cantilever beam (DCB) test was used to evaluate the interlaminar damage of BFRP laminate after fatigue cycling. The fatigue damage propagation mechanism was explored by means of failure modes, load displacement curves, mode I fracture toughness and crack propagation resistance model. The results show that the fatigue weakened the interlaminar properties and resulted in reduced fiber bridging. Especially for the acid fatigue, the laminate was damaged by the coupling of fatigue and acid corrosion. The linear loading stage, nonlinear slow growing stage, stable crack propagation stage and linear unloading stage for DCB after fatigue were observed in the load–displacement curve. The fatigue cycling has caused fracture toughness decrease of 15.0%, 13.8% and 24.1% on air fatigue, water fatigue and acid fatigue respectively. Compared to air fatigue, additional 9.1% interlaminar toughness decrease was evidenced for acidic corrosion fatigue due to the coupling effect of chemical corrosion and physical swelling. The fluctuating decline of crack resistance was caused by discontinuous interface damage, and the interlayer damage was randomly distributed. Thus the interface damage model was proposed to characterize the damage distribution and the damage size. Highlights Degradation law of BFRP under the coupling effect of acid immersion and fatigue load. Interface damage model for characterization of the damage distribution and damage size. Fatigue damage propagation of BFRP under coupling effect of cyclic load and corrosion.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Key Laboratory of C & PC Structures Ministry of Education Southeast University Nanjing China
National and Local Unified Engineering Research Center for Basalt Fiber Production and Application Technology Southeast University Nanjing China
College of Field Engineering Army Engineering University of PLA Nanjing China
Department of Urban and Civil Engineering Ibaraki University Hitachi Japan
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. Durability in a salt solution of pultruded composite materials used in structural sections for bridge deck applications
2. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000048710.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000487 ↗
3. 10.1016/S1005-0302(10)60087-410.1016/S1005-0302(10)60087-4 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11340210.1016/j.compstruct.2020.113402 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2004.01.01710.1016/j.compscitech.2004.01.017 ↗
6. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2002)6:3(143)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2002)6:3(143) ↗
7. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000229310.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002293 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.06.01910.1016/j.compositesb.2016.06.019 ↗
9. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000012210.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000122 ↗
10. 10.1016/0266-3538(86)90010-210.1016/0266-3538(86)90010-2 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.03.09210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.03.092 ↗
12. 10.1177/07316840302760910.1177/073168403027609 ↗
13. 10.1177/002199830504643010.1177/0021998305046430 ↗
14. 10.1177/002199831452662810.1177/0021998314526628 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2004.04.01210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2004.04.012 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2007.10.01410.1016/j.compstruct.2007.10.014 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.05.04710.1016/j.compositesb.2017.05.047 ↗
18. 10.1007/BF0072147110.1007/BF00721471 ↗
19. 10.1016/0010-4361(83)90014-910.1016/0010-4361(83)90014-9 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.05.01110.1016/j.compscitech.2005.05.011 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12558410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125584 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.08.02010.1016/j.compositesb.2011.08.020 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11445110.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114451 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.tafmec.2021.10301810.1016/j.tafmec.2021.103018 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2021.10777610.1016/j.engfracmech.2021.107776 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2004.03.00710.1016/j.compscitech.2004.03.007 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.apm.2016.03.01910.1016/j.apm.2016.03.019 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.03.00410.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.03.004 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2010.02.00110.1016/j.compositesb.2010.02.001 ↗
30. ASTM D5528‐2013 · 2013
31. A simple method for determining mode I interlaminar fracture toughness of composite at low temperature
32. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.10795810.1016/j.compositesb.2020.107958 ↗
33. 10.1016/S0167-4730(02)00057-710.1016/S0167-4730(02)00057-7 ↗