Size effect and scaling in quasi‐static and fatigue fracture of graphene polymer nanocomposites
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract This work investigated how the structure size affects the quasi‐static and fatigue behaviors of graphene polymer nanocomposites, a topic that has been often overlooked. The results showed that both quasi‐static and fatigue failure of these materials scale nonlinearly with the structure size due to the presence of a significant fracture process zone (FPZ) ahead of the crack tip induced by graphene nanomodification. Such a complicated size effect and scaling in either quasi‐static or fatigue scenario cannot be described by the linear elastic fracture mechanics, but can be well captured by the size effect law (SEL) which considers the FPZ. Thanks to the SEL, the enhanced quasi‐static and fatigue fracture properties were properly characterized and shown to be independent of the structure size. In addition, the differences on the morphological and mechanical behaviors between quasi‐static fracture and fatigue fracture were also identified and clarified in this work. The experimental data and analytical analyses reported in this article are important to deeply understand the mechanics of polymer‐based nanocomposites and even other quasi‐brittle materials (e.g., fiber‐reinforced polymers or their hybrid with nanoparticles, and so forth), and further advance the development of computational models capable of capturing size‐dependent fracture of materials under various loads.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Composite Material Mechanics · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
William E. Boeing Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics University of Washington Seattle Washington USA
School of Aerospace Engineering Tsinghua University Beijing China
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/nl203906r10.1021/nl203906r ↗
2. 10.1038/ncomms478210.1038/ncomms4782 ↗
3. 10.1126/science.115799610.1126/science.1157996 ↗
4. 10.1103/RevModPhys.81.10910.1103/RevModPhys.81.109 ↗
5. 10.1021/acsami.6b0858710.1021/acsami.6b08587 ↗
6. 10.1002/pc.2692110.1002/pc.26921 ↗
7. 10.1002/pc.2656510.1002/pc.26565 ↗
8. 10.1002/pc.2653710.1002/pc.26537 ↗
9. 10.1002/pc.2635310.1002/pc.26353 ↗
10. 10.1007/978-981-15-8307-0_710.1007/978-981-15-8307-0_7 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.carbon.2015.11.01810.1016/j.carbon.2015.11.018 ↗
12. 10.1002/pc.2716310.1002/pc.27163 ↗
13. 10.1002/pc.2700910.1002/pc.27009 ↗
14. 10.1002/pc.2687310.1002/pc.26873 ↗
15. 10.1002/pc.2645210.1002/pc.26452 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.mattod.2018.01.00710.1016/j.mattod.2018.01.007 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2016.09.00710.1016/j.compscitech.2016.09.007 ↗
18. 10.1021/acsami.8b1301810.1021/acsami.8b13018 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2020.10810110.1016/j.compscitech.2020.108101 ↗
20. 10.1002/pc.2703110.1002/pc.27031 ↗
21. 10.1002/pc.2687710.1002/pc.26877 ↗
22. 10.1002/pc.2695210.1002/pc.26952 ↗
23. 10.1002/pc.2682210.1002/pc.26822 ↗
24. 10.1002/pc.2661610.1002/pc.26616 ↗
25. 10.1002/pc.2649610.1002/pc.26496 ↗
26. 10.1002/pc.2614410.1002/pc.26144 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.09.09310.1016/j.compositesb.2018.09.093 ↗
28. 10.1039/C5RA00819K10.1039/C5RA00819K ↗
29. 10.1002/pc.2683710.1002/pc.26837 ↗
30. 10.1002/pc.2626810.1002/pc.26268 ↗
31. 10.1002/pc.2615310.1002/pc.26153 ↗
32. 10.1002/pc.2596510.1002/pc.25965 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2013.10.00810.1016/j.eurpolymj.2013.10.008 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2014.03.01410.1016/j.compscitech.2014.03.014 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2013.07.01610.1016/j.compscitech.2013.07.016 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.carbon.2015.12.03910.1016/j.carbon.2015.12.039 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.carbon.2013.08.03210.1016/j.carbon.2013.08.032 ↗
38. 10.1002/pc.2726210.1002/pc.27262 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2012.05.00510.1016/j.compscitech.2012.05.005 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2015.04.00810.1016/j.compscitech.2015.04.008 ↗
41. 10.1177/0731684421104927710.1177/07316844211049277 ↗
42. 10.1155/2015/56174210.1155/2015/561742 ↗
43. 10.1080/20550324.2017.136541410.1080/20550324.2017.1365414 ↗
44. 10.1111/ffe.1219110.1111/ffe.12191 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.06.01310.1016/j.compstruct.2017.06.013 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.04.02110.1016/j.compscitech.2005.04.021 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2004.04.00210.1016/j.compscitech.2004.04.002 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.carbon.2012.07.02110.1016/j.carbon.2012.07.021 ↗
49. 10.1177/002199831562578810.1177/0021998315625788 ↗
50. 10.1002/pat.360210.1002/pat.3602 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2017.08.00510.1016/j.polymertesting.2017.08.005 ↗
52. 10.1002/pc.2651810.1002/pc.26518 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.10917710.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109177 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.jcomc.2021.10017210.1016/j.jcomc.2021.100172 ↗
55. 10.1177/0954008321101121610.1177/09540083211011216 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.polymer.2021.12448610.1016/j.polymer.2021.124486 ↗
57. 10.1002/pat.324310.1002/pat.3243 ↗
58. 10.1007/s00396-015-3827-x10.1007/s00396-015-3827-x ↗
59. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.02.02710.1016/j.jmrt.2021.02.027 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.10.04810.1016/j.compositesb.2016.10.048 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.03.01310.1016/j.compositesa.2016.03.013 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.tafmec.2021.10303210.1016/j.tafmec.2021.103032 ↗
63. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.09.05210.1016/j.compositesb.2017.09.052 ↗
64. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.08.07910.1016/j.compstruct.2017.08.079 ↗
65. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.08.00210.1016/j.compstruct.2012.08.002 ↗
66. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2011.06.02110.1016/j.engfracmech.2011.06.021 ↗
67. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.04.00110.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.04.001 ↗
68. 10.1155/2013/56540110.1155/2013/565401 ↗
69. 10.1021/ma201563k10.1021/ma201563k ↗
70. 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.05.04010.1016/j.matdes.2014.05.040 ↗
71. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.04.03310.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.04.033 ↗
72. 10.1007/s10853-011-5724-010.1007/s10853-011-5724-0 ↗
73. 10.1002/smll.20090148010.1002/smll.200901480 ↗
74. Timoshenko S · 1983
75. 10.1039/c3ra22300k10.1039/c3ra22300k ↗
76. 10.3390/polym1209189510.3390/polym12091895 ↗
77. Size effect in fatigue fracture of concrete
78. Fatigue fracture of high‐strength concrete and size effect
79. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2015.10.01510.1016/j.ijfatigue.2015.10.015 ↗
80. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2014.08.01210.1016/j.ijfatigue.2014.08.012 ↗
81. 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2014.08.01510.1016/j.ijrmms.2014.08.015 ↗
82. 10.1017/978131658514610.1017/9781316585146 ↗
83. 10.1093/oso/9780192846242.001.000110.1093/oso/9780192846242.001.0001 ↗
84. Bažant ZP · 1998
85. Hexion Bellevue USA.http://hexion.com
86. Graphene Supermarket New York USA.https://graphene-supermarket.com
87. Vacmobiles Auckland New Zealand.https://www.vacmobiles.com
88. TAP Plastics Seattle Washington USA.http://www.tapplastics.com
89. Mixer Direct Louisville USA.http://www.mixerdirect.com
90. Hielscher Ultrasound Technology Ringwood USA.https://www.hielscher.com
91. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2011.10.00410.1016/j.engfracmech.2011.10.004 ↗
92. 10.1080/15685543.2013.80714710.1080/15685543.2013.807147 ↗
93. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2013.09.00610.1016/j.engfracmech.2013.09.006 ↗
94. 10.1002/pc.2698510.1002/pc.26985 ↗
95. 10.1002/pc.2555110.1002/pc.25551 ↗
96. 10.1515/jmbm-2020-000810.1515/jmbm-2020-0008 ↗
97. ASTM D5045‐99.Standard Test Methods for Plane‐Strain Fracture Toughness and Stain Energy Release Rate of Plastic Materials.1999.
98. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2019.03.03310.1016/j.engfracmech.2019.03.033 ↗
99. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.09.00310.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.09.003 ↗
100. Dino‐Lite. Torrance California USA.https://www.dinolite.us