Effect of dynamic friction and static friction in finite element analysis of carbon fiber preform
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract This paper aims to improve the accuracy of the finite element analysis for the preform shape transformation according to the difference in the type of carbon fiber and friction force. The carbon fiber type (Toray T700, Zoltek), the fiber direction (0°/90°, ± 45°), and the frictional force were measured, which occurred between the fiber and the mold and between the fiber and the fiber. A comparative experiment was conducted through actual preform production by designating it as a variable for element analysis. The analysis was conducted according to the difference between the static friction coefficient and the dynamic friction coefficient in the molding analysis. Within the range of the Coulomb equation, the shear angle changing was compared with the actual preform shape to show similar results.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Textile materials and evaluations · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Mechanical Engineering and Vibrations Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Mobility Parts Research Team Technical Research Center, Hyundai‐Steel Dangjin‐si South Korea
School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Seoul National University Seoul South Korea
Department of Mechanical Engineering Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology (UNIST) Ulsan South Korea
References (17)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s10443-012-9258-710.1007/s10443-012-9258-7 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2003.11.00710.1016/j.compositesb.2003.11.007 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.ast.2018.06.02010.1016/j.ast.2018.06.020 ↗
4. 10.1007/s00170-022-10478-810.1007/s00170-022-10478-8 ↗
5. 10.1002/pc.2523310.1002/pc.25233 ↗
6. 10.1002/pc.2657510.1002/pc.26575 ↗
7. 10.1007/s10965-022-03396-610.1007/s10965-022-03396-6 ↗
8. 10.1002/pc.2595510.1002/pc.25955 ↗
9. 10.1088/2631-6331/abf48010.1088/2631-6331/abf480 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.09.01810.1016/j.compositesa.2005.09.018 ↗
11. Kaiser B.;Pyttel T.;Haug E.;Duddeck F.“Draping simulation with a new finite element formulation involving an internal unit cell” In AIP Conference Proceedings; AIP Publishing LLC 2017pp.30001.10.1063/1.5007988 ↗
12. Greenwood J. A.;Williamson J. P.“Contact of nominally flat surfaces” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences1966 295 300–319.10.1098/rspa.1966.0242 ↗
13. 10.1088/0022-3727/10/8/01810.1088/0022-3727/10/8/018 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.08.03410.1016/j.compositesa.2016.08.034 ↗
15. 10.1016/0043-1648(59)90267-410.1016/0043-1648(59)90267-4 ↗
16. 10.1080/0040516090317859110.1080/00405160903178591 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.10.01710.1016/j.compositesa.2016.10.017 ↗