journal article·2022-06

Characterizations and performances of polysulfone/graphene oxide with structural defects repaired by cellulose nanocrystals

Yansong Yu, Yuke Liang, Yue Zhang, Zhihui Xie, Jinyao Chen, Zhuo Zheng, Jian Kang, Feng Yang, Ya Cao, Ming Xiang

Polymer Composites· Volume 43· Issue 6
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract In this article, the nanofillers of graphene oxide (GO) and cellulose nanocrystal (CNC), which called GC, was prepared. The X‐ray photoelectron spectrometer (XPS), Raman spectra, thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) were carried out for its characterizations. Besides, its influences on mechanical properties, thermal stability and gas barrier properties of polysulfone (PSF) composites were also studied. The hydrophilic interaction occurs between GO and CNC, so that CNC repaired the structural defects of GO. The intensity ratio of D peak to G peak (ID/IG) in Raman spectra of GC was 0.96, which was less than the raw GO's ID/IG of 1.04. Compared with GO, GC could more effectively improve the tensile strength (+39.8%), elongation‐at‐break (+20.6%), Young's modulus (+30.7%), thermal decomposition temperature (+13°C) and O2 permeability (−95.2%) of PSF composites. At the content of 0.5 wt%, GC had the most significant effect on the performance of PSF composites.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · Graphene research and applications · Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

State Key Laboratory of Polymer Materials Engineering Polymer Research Institute of Sichuan University Chengdu China

Dongfang Electric Machinery Co., Ltd. Deyang China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (35)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b0091410.1021/acs.jpclett.5b00914 ↗
2. 10.1039/C5RA20243D10.1039/C5RA20243D ↗
3. 10.1016/j.desal.2012.11.03710.1016/j.desal.2012.11.037 ↗
4. 10.1039/C4CS00423J10.1039/C4CS00423J ↗
5. 10.1039/c0jm00261e10.1039/c0jm00261e ↗
6. 10.1016/j.carbon.2011.04.05510.1016/j.carbon.2011.04.055 ↗
7. 10.1038/nature0496910.1038/nature04969 ↗
8. 10.1021/ma400185j10.1021/ma400185j ↗
9. 10.1126/science.115799610.1126/science.1157996 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.carbon.2015.11.01810.1016/j.carbon.2015.11.018 ↗
11. 10.1063/1.368717310.1063/1.3687173 ↗
12. 10.1002/adfm.20080177610.1002/adfm.200801776 ↗
13. 10.1039/B917103G10.1039/B917103G ↗
14. 10.1016/j.carbon.2011.02.02310.1016/j.carbon.2011.02.023 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.carbon.2011.06.07710.1016/j.carbon.2011.06.077 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.carbon.2009.01.02710.1016/j.carbon.2009.01.027 ↗
17. 10.1007/s00289-017-2046-710.1007/s00289-017-2046-7 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.mattod.2015.01.01710.1016/j.mattod.2015.01.017 ↗
19. 10.1038/s41467-018-04604-y10.1038/s41467-018-04604-y ↗
20. 10.1002/adma.20140454110.1002/adma.201404541 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2017.06.02510.1016/j.compositesa.2017.06.025 ↗
22. 10.1039/c0cs00108b10.1039/c0cs00108b ↗
23. 10.1007/s10570-012-9841-y10.1007/s10570-012-9841-y ↗
24. 10.1007/s10570-016-0912-310.1007/s10570-016-0912-3 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2016.07.00610.1016/j.compscitech.2016.07.006 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.carbon.2020.04.02410.1016/j.carbon.2020.04.024 ↗
27. 10.3139/217.260310.3139/217.2603 ↗
28. 10.1039/C8RA02234H10.1039/C8RA02234H ↗
29. 10.1021/cm100998e10.1021/cm100998e ↗
30. 10.1016/j.carbon.2004.03.00510.1016/j.carbon.2004.03.005 ↗
31. 10.1063/1.167410810.1063/1.1674108 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.carbon.2012.02.01610.1016/j.carbon.2012.02.016 ↗
33. 10.1039/C7NR09037D10.1039/C7NR09037D ↗
34. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.11.01810.1016/j.compositesb.2013.11.018 ↗
35. 10.1002/smll.20090076510.1002/smll.200900765 ↗