Enhanced flexural strength of carbon nanotubes‐glass fiber epoxy composite laminates using an electrospray deposition technique
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The electrospray deposition technique (ESD) was used to coat carbon nanotubes (CNTs) uniformly on the surface of glass fiber (GF) and to increase the flexural strength of CNTs‐GF epoxy composite laminate. The deposition of CNTs on the GF surface has been optimized by the applied voltage and spray time. The deposited CNTs on the GF surface showed a well dispersed and homogeneous coating. Implementing optimized ESD in the fabrication of composite laminate caused a 25.26% to 59.28% improvement of flexural performance in CNTs‐GF composite laminate. The dispersion of CNTs was characterized by using a digital microscope, a field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM), and a transmission electron microscope (TEM). The result revealed that the applied voltage had an impact on the well‐dispersed coated CNTs, while the spray time affected the flexural output.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrohydrodynamics and Fluid Dynamics · Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Materials and Mineral Resources Engineering Universiti Sains Malaysia Nibong Tebal Malaysia
Faculty of Chemical Engineering Technology Universiti Malaysia Perlis (UniMAP) Perlis Malaysia
Funding
Universiti Sains Malaysia
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. Callister W. D. · 2011
2. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.10561910.1016/j.compositesa.2019.105619 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2012.08.02710.1016/j.compositesa.2012.08.027 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2009.12.01110.1016/j.compositesa.2009.12.011 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.11.00410.1016/j.compositesa.2016.11.004 ↗
6. Pirzada M. M. · Int. J. Mater. Chem. · 2015 · 5 · 117
7. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2012.06.00810.1016/j.compscitech.2012.06.008 ↗
8. 10.1002/9781119185093.ch210.1002/9781119185093.ch2 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2017.04.01410.1016/j.ultsonch.2017.04.014 ↗
10. 10.1039/c000041h10.1039/c000041h ↗
11. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2017.06.02410.1016/j.compscitech.2017.06.024 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.carbon.2012.09.01110.1016/j.carbon.2012.09.011 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.05.00410.1016/j.compositesa.2016.05.004 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.04.14610.1016/j.apsusc.2015.04.146 ↗
15. K.Matzinger Evolution of metal catalyst during CVD synthesis of carbon nanotubes (Doctoral dissertation Université de Fribourg).2006.
16. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.04.00610.1016/j.compositesb.2014.04.006 ↗
17. 10.1016/0021-8502(94)90199-610.1016/0021-8502(94)90199-6 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.carbon.2016.07.05810.1016/j.carbon.2016.07.058 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.elstat.2007.10.00110.1016/j.elstat.2007.10.001 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.05.06610.1016/j.compositesb.2019.05.066 ↗
21. Jebadurai D. S. · Indian J. Eng. Mater. Sci. · 2015 · 22 · 167
22. 10.1002/pen.2492910.1002/pen.24929 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2019.10072310.1016/j.mtcomm.2019.100723 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2020.10578410.1016/j.compositesa.2020.105784 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.11.01510.1016/j.compositesa.2014.11.015 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.matdes.2019.10771010.1016/j.matdes.2019.107710 ↗
27. 10.1177/073168441557398010.1177/0731684415573980 ↗
28. King J. E. · Met. Mater. Int · 1989 · 5 · 720