journal article·2018-12

Two dimensional long‐flexible fiber orientation simulation in squeeze flow

Gleb Meirson, Andrew N. Hrymak

Polymer Composites· Volume 39· Issue 12
Publisher page

Abstract

Long‐flexible fiber orientation under the influence of a squeeze flow field is an important engineering problem. Fiber orientation models have been constructed for a short fiber in simple shear. This article uses the long fiber model previously proposed by the authors (Meirson and Hrymak, Polymer Composites, 37, 2425 (2015)). This new model accounts for flow velocity gradient along the fiber and allows the fiber to exhibit flexibility. In this study, this model is applied to solve a two‐dimensional squeeze flow case that approximates compression molding flow. It was found that unlike the simple shear flow case in the squeeze flow case the relative dimensions of the system has a great effect on fiber orientation. In addition, several rules of thumb for compression molding are proposed from the results. POLYM. COMPOS., 39:4656–4665, 2018. © 2017 Society of Plastics Engineers
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Composite Material Mechanics · Rheology and Fluid Dynamics Studies · Polymer Foaming and Composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering University of Western Ontario London Ontario N6A 5B9 Canada

Funding

General Motors of Canada

References (38)

Show source-provided references
1. Matthews F. L. · 1994
2. 10.1016/1359-835X(95)00065-A10.1016/1359-835X(95)00065-A ↗
3. 10.1016/1359-835X(96)00066-810.1016/1359-835X(96)00066-8 ↗
4. 10.1016/1359-835X(96)00016-410.1016/1359-835X(96)00016-4 ↗
5. 10.1016/S1359-835X(96)00127-310.1016/S1359-835X(96)00127-3 ↗
6. 10.1016/S1359-835X(02)00179-310.1016/S1359-835X(02)00179-3 ↗
7. 10.1002/pen.76031180610.1002/pen.760311806 ↗
8. Crosby J. M. · 1991 · 139
9. 10.1177/089270570301600400110.1177/0892705703016004001 ↗
10. 10.1063/1.170773910.1063/1.1707739 ↗
11. 10.1002/pen.76028070310.1002/pen.760280703 ↗
12. 10.1002/pc.75001010510.1002/pc.750010105 ↗
13. 10.1115/1.317176510.1115/1.3171765 ↗
14. 10.1122/1.55034010.1122/1.550340 ↗
15. 10.1002/pen.1034910.1002/pen.10349 ↗
16. 10.1016/0377-0257(94)85003-810.1016/0377-0257(94)85003-8 ↗
17. 10.3139/217.95015510.3139/217.950155 ↗
18. 10.1016/0377-0257(80)85012-910.1016/0377-0257(80)85012-9 ↗
19. 10.1115/1.318592110.1115/1.3185921 ↗
20. 10.1122/1.55004910.1122/1.550049 ↗
21. C.Perez D.Ramirez T.AOsswald in Proceedings of the SPE ANTEC Orlando FL USA (2015).
22. S.Goris M.Herchet C.Perez U.Gandhi T.A.Osswald in SPE ANTEC Conference Technical Papers Las Vegas NV (2014).
23. 10.1002/pc.1025410.1002/pc.10254 ↗
24. 10.1002/pc.75015050310.1002/pc.750150503 ↗
25. Blei R. · Polym. Compos. · 2016
26. G.M.Lambert D.GBaird Proceedings of the ASME 11th International Manufacturing Science and Engineering Conference Blacksburg VA USA (2016).
27. 10.1122/1.471749610.1122/1.4717496 ↗
28. Thorpe J. F. · 1967
29. 10.1016/0043-1648(77)90072-210.1016/0043-1648(77)90072-2 ↗
30. 10.1002/pc.2342710.1002/pc.23427 ↗
31. 10.1122/1.55063010.1122/1.550630 ↗
32. 10.1098/rspa.1922.007810.1098/rspa.1922.0078 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2013.04.00210.1016/j.compositesa.2013.04.002 ↗
34. 10.1088/0953-8984/27/27/27510110.1088/0953-8984/27/27/275101 ↗
35. 10.1002/pc.2226210.1002/pc.22262 ↗
36. 10.1016/1359-835X(96)00034-610.1016/1359-835X(96)00034-6 ↗
37. 10.1177/07316844840030020110.1177/073168448400300201 ↗
38. G.Meirson inMold Flow of Long Fibers in Compression Molding Process The University of Western Ontario (2016).