journal article·2024-12-20Open access

Thermal protective and hydrophobic coating on polyimide resin matrix composites surface for improved aging resistance

Zhaoyang Fan, Chao Xiong, Junhui Yin, Youchun Zou, Yu Zhang, Xiujie Zhu

Polymer Composites· Volume 45· Issue 18

Abstract

Abstract Polyimide composites are easily degraded in high temperature and high humidity environments for long service, which reduces their reliability and stability in aerospace, electronic components, weapons, and other fields. In this paper, the inorganic and organic multiphase double‐layer coating was prepared. The insulating layer was made of vinyl polysilazane resin as the base material and hollow glass microspheres as the filler. The hydrophobic layer consisted of polydimethylsiloxane as the base material, hollow phenolic microspheres, and nano‐TiO2 as the filler. The heat resistance, hydrophobic properties, and aging resistance of the coated polyimide resin matrix composites were studied. The results showed that the thickness of the double‐layer coating was about 200 μm. Under the 200°C thermal insulation test, the maximum temperature drop can be achieved at 59.7°C. After adding 5 wt% TiO2, the static contact angle of composites was increased from 86.2° to 127.7°. Significantly, the hydrophobic performance was improved by 48.1%, which was due to the construction of micro‐nano structures in the surface layer coating. In the accelerated hydrothermal aging tests, the bending properties of coated composite materials can be improved by 8.5%, 3.2%, and 8.7% in water, alkali, and acid environments, respectively. The moisture absorption of glass fiber and the pyrolysis of polyimide led to the degradation of the mechanical properties. The existence of heat‐resistant and hydrophobic coating could effectively eliminate this adverse effect, which was of great significance for polyimide composites to cope with various service environments. Highlights A novel coating consisting of thermal insulating and hydrophobic layers was developed on glass fiber reinforced polyimide composites (G/PI) composites. The maximum temperature drop of coating can be achieved at 59.7°C. The static contact angle of coated G/PI composites was increased from 86.2° to 127.7°. In the aging tests, the protective effect of the coating resulted in improved mechanical strengths of G/PI composites. The microscopic damage morphology was performed to analyze the anti‐aging properties of the coating.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Synthesis and properties of polymers · Epoxy Resin Curing Processes · Silicone and Siloxane Chemistry

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Army Engineering University, Shijiazhuang Campus Shijiazhuang China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (48)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2012.02.00510.1016/j.progpolymsci.2012.02.005 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2022.10710310.1016/j.porgcoat.2022.107103 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.solener.2019.11.04810.1016/j.solener.2019.11.048 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.giant.2024.10026210.1016/j.giant.2024.100262 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.surfin.2024.10389910.1016/j.surfin.2024.103899 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.polymer.2023.12571710.1016/j.polymer.2023.125717 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2023.10745910.1016/j.compositesa.2023.107459 ↗
8. 10.1177/0954008303015400310.1177/09540083030154003 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2012.09.00510.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2012.09.005 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.memsci.2018.05.01810.1016/j.memsci.2018.05.018 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.09.01710.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.09.017 ↗
12. 10.1177/095400831880404610.1177/0954008318804046 ↗
13. 10.1080/09243046.2018.144612410.1080/09243046.2018.1446124 ↗
14. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.978.31610.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.978.316 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.matpr.2022.05.13610.1016/j.matpr.2022.05.136 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.11566610.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115666 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2010.08.02910.1016/j.surfcoat.2010.08.029 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2011.04.05710.1016/j.apsusc.2011.04.057 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2012.05.04910.1016/j.matchemphys.2012.05.049 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2009.01.03110.1016/j.surfcoat.2009.01.031 ↗
21. 10.1016/S0257‐8972(99)00146‐210.1016/S0257‐8972(99)00146‐2 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2004.10.03410.1016/j.surfcoat.2004.10.034 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2011.07.00510.1016/j.surfcoat.2011.07.005 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2020.12623110.1016/j.surfcoat.2020.126231 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.tsf.2008.12.02510.1016/j.tsf.2008.12.025 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.jiec.2008.09.00910.1016/j.jiec.2008.09.009 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.corsci.2013.04.00310.1016/j.corsci.2013.04.003 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2012.05.16110.1016/j.apsusc.2012.05.161 ↗
29. 10.1007/s11665‐019‐03914‐610.1007/s11665‐019‐03914‐6 ↗
30. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.813.26710.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.813.267 ↗
31. 10.1007/s11665‐018‐3147‐710.1007/s11665‐018‐3147‐7 ↗
32. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.941.189210.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.941.1892 ↗
33. 10.1007/s11666‐019‐00911‐y10.1007/s11666‐019‐00911‐y ↗
34. 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2014.10.00410.1016/j.porgcoat.2014.10.004 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2023.11541210.1016/j.marpolbul.2023.115412 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2020.12648110.1016/j.surfcoat.2020.126481 ↗
37. 10.15541/jim2019053210.15541/jim20190532 ↗
38. 10.1007/s10971‐022‐05871‐410.1007/s10971‐022‐05871‐4 ↗
39. 10.1039/c0jm04546b10.1039/c0jm04546b ↗
40. 10.1016/j.cej.2021.13416210.1016/j.cej.2021.134162 ↗
41. 10.1007/s00396‐022‐05032‐710.1007/s00396‐022‐05032‐7 ↗
42. 10.1007/s00339‐015‐9525‐110.1007/s00339‐015‐9525‐1 ↗
43. 10.1007/s11998‐014‐9653‐010.1007/s11998‐014‐9653‐0 ↗
44. 10.1088/2053‐1591/ac507410.1088/2053‐1591/ac5074 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.surfin.2023.10306410.1016/j.surfin.2023.103064 ↗
46. 10.1007/s10965‐023‐03814‐310.1007/s10965‐023‐03814‐3 ↗
47. 10.1007/s10965‐006‐0137‐510.1007/s10965‐006‐0137‐5 ↗
48. 10.1063/1.135832310.1063/1.1358323 ↗