journal article·2023-12Open access

Rational tailoring of architectures and microenvironment on MOFs /natural clay hybrid materials for efficiently boosted performance of hybrid proton exchange membranes

Xiaohong Feng, Jie Wang, Hai Liu, Chunli Gong, Fan Cheng, Jing Ni, Fuqiang Hu

Polymer Composites· Volume 44· Issue 12

Abstract

Abstract Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) is now becoming the most fascinating conductive materials due to designable structure and pores at molecular level, and available crystal structure for the study of conduction mechanism. Nevertheless, comparing to the design of molecular structures of MOFs, the hybrid of MOFs with special micro/nano‐structured materials is considered to be a more effective approach for improved properties. In this study, the PAT@UiO‐66‐SO 3 H hybrid material was constructed with high conductive UiO‐66‐SO 3 H, a famous kind of MOFs, and polydopamine‐coated natural clay attapulgite (PAT), then the prepared hybrid material was blended with chitosan (CS) to prepare proton exchange membranes (PEMs). Owing to the special architectures and microenvironment, combining with the advantages of composition with UiO‐66‐SO 3 H and attapulgite, the prepared composite membranes showed considerable improved performances, including tensile strength, thermal and structural stability, fuel resistance ability, conduction and single cell performances. The CS/PAT@UiO‐66‐SO 3 H‐5 composite membrane exhibited the highly enhanced tensile strength of 67 MPa and improved thermal stability with T g value of 235°C, as well as the lowest methanol crossover value of 1.2 × 10 −6 cm 2 s −1 . Besides, the highest proton conductivity of 38.8 mS cm −1 at 80°C and power density of 37.9 mWcm −2 was achieved with CS/PAT@UiO‐66‐SO 3 H‐3 composite membrane, these performances were higher than pristine CS of 22.7 mS cm −1 and 32.2 mW cm −2 respectively. Our investigation reveals great application potential of MOFs based hybrid materials in fabricating of high performance composite PEMs. Highlights PAT@UiO‐66‐SO 3 H hybrid materials were constructed from MOFs and natural clay. The hybrid materials possessed special architectures and microenvironment. The PAT@UiO‐66‐SO 3 H introduced consecutive channels and proton sites. The hybrid membranes achieved excellent performances.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fuel Cells and Related Materials · Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications · Membrane-based Ion Separation Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Hubei Collaborative Innovation Center for Biomass Conversion and Utilization, Hubei Engineering & Technology Research Center for Functional Materials from Biomass, School of Chemistry and Material Science Hubei Engineering University Xiaogan Hubei China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China · Natural Science Foundation of Xiaogan Municipality

References (50)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1126/science.123044410.1126/science.1230444 ↗
2. 10.1021/cr200190s10.1021/cr200190s ↗
3. 10.1039/b802426j10.1039/b802426j ↗
4. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.01.02010.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.01.020 ↗
5. 10.1002/pen.2551010.1002/pen.25510 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.ccr.2021.21391510.1016/j.ccr.2021.213915 ↗
7. 10.1002/adma.20190709010.1002/adma.201907090 ↗
8. 10.1039/C4CS00093E10.1039/C4CS00093E ↗
9. 10.1016/j.ccr.2019.21310010.1016/j.ccr.2019.213100 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.ccr.2022.21474010.1016/j.ccr.2022.214740 ↗
11. 10.1039/C7CS00041C10.1039/C7CS00041C ↗
12. 10.1021/acsami.0c0810310.1021/acsami.0c08103 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.04.08710.1016/j.electacta.2017.04.087 ↗
14. 10.1039/C9NJ05572J10.1039/C9NJ05572J ↗
15. 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.1c0216510.1021/acs.inorgchem.1c02165 ↗
16. 10.3390/nano810077510.3390/nano8100775 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2019.10976310.1016/j.micromeso.2019.109763 ↗
18. 10.1002/app.5282910.1002/app.52829 ↗
19. 10.1039/D0NJ02532A10.1039/D0NJ02532A ↗
20. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.10882810.1016/j.compositesb.2021.108828 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.03.03310.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.03.033 ↗
22. 10.1002/ange.20150407710.1002/ange.201504077 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2022.15340710.1016/j.apsusc.2022.153407 ↗
24. 10.1039/C5CC06694H10.1039/C5CC06694H ↗
25. 10.1002/er.778110.1002/er.7781 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2023.11055810.1016/j.compositesb.2023.110558 ↗
27. 10.1002/pc.2700210.1002/pc.27002 ↗
28. 10.1021/acsami.6b0590110.1021/acsami.6b05901 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.jece.2022.10874810.1016/j.jece.2022.108748 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.snb.2019.12753410.1016/j.snb.2019.127534 ↗
31. 10.1021/ie51403a01210.1021/ie51403a012 ↗
32. 10.1007/s10965‐022‐02953‐310.1007/s10965‐022‐02953‐3 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.06.01810.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.06.018 ↗
34. 10.1021/acsami.6b0412710.1021/acsami.6b04127 ↗
35. 10.1039/C5TA00959F10.1039/C5TA00959F ↗
36. 10.1021/acs.iecr.8b0427710.1021/acs.iecr.8b04277 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.10360110.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.103601 ↗
38. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b0282710.1021/acssuschemeng.8b02827 ↗
39. 10.1002/app.4907910.1002/app.49079 ↗
40. 10.1002/pc.2553610.1002/pc.25536 ↗
41. 10.1002/anie.20141170310.1002/anie.201411703 ↗
42. 10.1039/D0DT03051A10.1039/D0DT03051A ↗
43. 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.1c0323110.1021/acs.inorgchem.1c03231 ↗
44. 10.3390/ijms2102063210.3390/ijms21020632 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.09.08510.1016/j.carbpol.2015.09.085 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.22717610.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.227176 ↗
47. 10.1002/mame.20210051910.1002/mame.202100519 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.01.03210.1016/j.carbpol.2018.01.032 ↗
49. 10.1039/C7RA07063B10.1039/C7RA07063B ↗
50. 10.1039/C6CS00528D10.1039/C6CS00528D ↗