Analysis and optimization of M‐shaped boom based on response surface method
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The M‐shaped boom is a support structure that can be packed and launched and deployed in orbit using stored elastic strain energy. This work attempts a method to optimize the M boom. The response surface method was used to fit the finite element (FE) results to obtain surrogate models for the strain storage and the fundamental frequency in the deployed state, and the average errors between the surrogate model results and FE results were 1.56% and 0.9% respectively. The influence of different design variables on the results is analyzed by using surrogate models. Considering the requirements of boom deployment, a non‐dominated sorting genetic algorithm is used for multi‐objective optimization. The optimization targets the maximum strain stored energy and the maximum fundamental frequency, with the constraint of boom mass. The optimization results are at the Pareto frontier.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Analysis and Optimization · Dynamics and Control of Mechanical Systems · Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Collage of Material Science and Technology Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Nanjing China
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/pc.2606310.1002/pc.26063 ↗
2. 10.1002/pc.2570310.1002/pc.25703 ↗
3. 10.1002/pc.2465810.1002/pc.24658 ↗
4. 10.1002/pc.2609610.1002/pc.26096 ↗
5. T.Russell C.Johnson A. C.Few E.Stewart E. R.Stewart Lessons learned from the flight unit testing of the near earth asteroid scout flight system. Presented at: Int. Symp. on Solar Sailing (ISSS)(2019).
6. D. S.Adams M.Mobrem MARSIS antenna flight deployment anomaly and resolution. in Collection of technical papers. Presented at: AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures Structural Dynamics and Materials Conf. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc vol.21088–1096(2006).10.2514/6.2006-1684 ↗
7. Ö.Soykasap A. M.Watt S.Pellegrino New deployable reflector concept. Collection of technical papers. Presented at: AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures Structural Dynamics and Materials Conf.1 683–693(2004).10.2514/6.2004-1574 ↗
8. M.Arya N.Lee S.Pellegrino Ultralight structures for space solar power satellites. Presented at: 3rd AIAA Spacecraft Structures Conf. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc AIAA 2016. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2016-1950.10.2514/6.2016-1950 ↗
9. Herbeck L. · Spacecraft Struct. Mater. Mech. Test. · 2001 · 468 · 107
10. J. M.Fernandezet al.NASA's advanced solar sail propulsion system for low‐cost deep space exploration and science missions that uses high performance rollable composite booms. Presented at: Int. Symp. on Solar Sailing 11(2017).
11. 10.1007/s11431-020-1681-010.1007/s11431-020-1681-0 ↗
12. 10.1109/AERO.2016.750072310.1109/AERO.2016.7500723 ↗
13. A. J.Lee J. M.Fernandez Mechanics of bistable two‐shelled composite booms. Presented in: 2018 AIAA Spacecraft Structures Conf1–24(2018). doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2018-0938.10.2514/6.2018-0938 ↗
14. B. D.Adamcik J. A.Firth M. R.Pankow J. M.Fernandez Impact of storage time and operational temperature on deployable composite booms. AIAA Scitech 2020 Forumvol.11–10(2020).10.2514/6.2020-1183 ↗
15. A.Gomez‐Delrio K.Kwok Viscoelastic analysis of stowage and quasi‐static deployment of composite tape springs. Presented at: AIAA Spacecraft Structures Conf 20181–15(2018).
16. E. C.Borowski Viscoelastic effects in carbon fiber reinforced polymer strain energy deployable composite tape springs. (2017).
17. 10.2514/1.4732110.2514/1.47321 ↗
18. S.Ferraro S.Pellegrino Self‐deployable joints for ultra‐light space structures. Presented at: AIAA Spacecraft Structures Conf 20181–13(2018).10.2514/6.2018-0694 ↗
19. 10.3901/JME.2020.05.17210.3901/JME.2020.05.172 ↗
20. Ruixiong L. · J. Astronaut. · 2012 · 33 · 1164
21. Zou T. · Harbin Gongcheng Daxue Xuebao/J. Harbin Eng. Univ. · 2013 · 34 · 151
22. 10.1016/j.tws.2020.10670410.1016/j.tws.2020.106704 ↗
23. T. W.Murphey D. E.Turse L. G.Adams TRAC™ boom structural mechanics. Presented at: 4th AIAA Spacecraft Structures Conf 20171–13. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2017-0171.10.2514/6.2017-0171 ↗
24. C.Leclerc L.Wilson M. A.Bessa S.Pellegrino Characterization of ultra‐thin composite triangular rollable and collapsible booms. Presented at: 4th AIAA Spacecraft Structures Conf15(2017).10.2514/6.2017-0172 ↗
25. 10.1007/s00158-018-2118-910.1007/s00158-018-2118-9 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.04.02210.1016/j.compstruct.2017.04.022 ↗
27. Yang H. · J. Vib. Shock · 2018 · 37 · 47
28. T.Amamotoet al.Modeling of composite booms' deployment dynamics under microgravity based on ground tests. Presented at: 2018 AIAA Spacecraft Structures Conf122018. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2018–1435.10.2514/6.2018-1435 ↗
29. K. B.Cox K. A.Medina Scalability of triangular rollable and collapsible booms. AIAA Scitech 2019 Forum(2019). doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2019-2026.10.2514/6.2019-2026 ↗
30. 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1951.tb00067.x10.1111/j.2517-6161.1951.tb00067.x ↗
31. 10.1109/4235.99601710.1109/4235.996017 ↗