journal article·2020-08

Automated damage detection and characterization of polymer composite images using Tsallis‐particle swarm optimization‐based multilevel threshold and multifractals

Jac Fredo Agastinose Ronickom, Abilash Retnakaran Sobhana, Femi Robert, Sri Madhava Raja Nadaradjane, Suresh Kumar Chelliah

Polymer Composites· Volume 41· Issue 8
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Automatic detection and quantification of damage in the composite structure are a vital requirement in the assessment of the overall structural integrity of modern aerospace systems. In this work, the indentation‐induced damage in the glass fiber‐reinforced polymer composite (GFRP) laminates is investigated using multilevel threshold‐based particle swarm optimization (PSO) and multifractals. Initially, the digital images are acquired after the composite laminates are subjected to 5 mm, 6 mm, and 7 mm indentation displacements. The indentation‐induced damage images are filtered using anisotropic diffusion filter and damage regions are segmented using Tsallis‐PSO method. The magnitude of the damage is analyzed using multifractal spectrum features. Results show that Tsallis‐PSO with the four‐level thresholds is optimal for the segmentation of the damage. Tsallis‐PSO is also able to segment the boundaries of the damage precisely. The damage due to different levels of indentation depth is well differentiated by the multifractal spectrum features. Multifractal spectrum constructed using the scale, ranges from q = −1 to +1, discriminates the damage with a high statistical significance of P < .001. The damage dimension linearly progresses ( R = .993) with increasing the level of indentation depth. Even though, the proposed process pipeline is an initial step of investigation of damages in GFRP, this framework can be used in the industries for the quantification of damage in GFRP composite laminates.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Thermography and Photoacoustic Techniques · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering Nanyang Technological University Singapore Singapore

Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering College of Engineering Kollam Kerala India

Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering SRM Institute of Science and Technology Kattankulathur Tamil Nadu India

Department of Electronics and Instrumentation Engineering St. Joseph's College of Engineering Chennai India

Department of Aeronautical Engineering Bharath Institute of Higher Education and Research Chennai India

References (48)

Show source-provided references
1. Mouritz A. P. · 2012
2. 10.1080/10589759.2019.168449110.1080/10589759.2019.1684491 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.12.01210.1016/j.compositesb.2016.12.012 ↗
4. 10.1016/S0266-3538(99)00196-710.1016/S0266-3538(99)00196-7 ↗
5. 10.1016/S0266-3538(00)00152-410.1016/S0266-3538(00)00152-4 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2009.02.02910.1016/j.compscitech.2009.02.029 ↗
7. Flores J. E. A. · Inter J. Comput. Meth. · 2014 · 11 · 344004
8. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.08.05410.1016/j.compstruct.2012.08.054 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2006.04.08710.1016/j.compstruct.2006.04.087 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.03.01210.1016/j.compositesb.2014.03.012 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.07.07810.1016/j.compositesb.2017.07.078 ↗
12. Suresh Kumar C. · Struct. Health Monit. · 2018 · 18 · 1253
13. Suresh Kumar C. · J. Nondestruct. Eval. · 2015 · 34 · 1
14. Soman R. N. · ASME J. Nondestruct. Eval. Diagn. Prog. Eng. Syst. · 2018 · 1 · 1
15. 10.5772/intechopen.8057310.5772/intechopen.80573 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2017.10.02310.1016/j.compscitech.2017.10.023 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.measurement.2017.01.00210.1016/j.measurement.2017.01.002 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.12.06410.1016/j.compositesb.2018.12.064 ↗
19. 10.1520/JTE2018070110.1520/JTE20180701 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.12.02810.1016/j.compositesa.2016.12.028 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.12.02010.1016/j.compstruct.2015.12.020 ↗
22. R.Huang K. L.Ma P.McCormick W.Ward. Proc of the IEEE Conf on Visualization Seattle WA USA 19‐24 October2003.547–554.https://doi.org/10.1109/VISUAL.2003.125041810.1109/VISUAL.2003.1250418 ↗
23. 10.1109/TVCG.2007.7059810.1109/TVCG.2007.70598 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.10.02010.1016/j.compscitech.2008.10.020 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2011.05.01510.1016/j.ymssp.2011.05.015 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.09.00110.1016/j.compositesa.2015.09.001 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.06.10910.1016/j.compstruct.2018.06.109 ↗
28. 10.1007/s00170-014-5616-y10.1007/s00170-014-5616-y ↗
29. Kaur T. · Int. J. Comput. Syst. Eng. · 2018 · 4
30. 10.1007/s10853-009-4016-410.1007/s10853-009-4016-4 ↗
31. 10.1007/s11340-011-9570-410.1007/s11340-011-9570-4 ↗
32. Guo H. · Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. · 2015 · 2015 · 1
33. M. P. S.Jorge M.João A.Stella M. R. S. T.João M. P. D.Luís. Proc of the 6th International Conf on Mechanics and Materials in Design (M2D'2015) Ponta Delgada/Azores Portugal 26‐30 July2015.1.
34. 10.1016/j.matpr.2018.04.10410.1016/j.matpr.2018.04.104 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.12.01310.1016/j.compstruct.2018.12.013 ↗
36. Balankin A. S. · Inorg. Mater. · 1999 · 35 · 1047
37. 10.1590/1980-5373-mr-2018-026510.1590/1980-5373-mr-2018-0265 ↗
38. Suresh K. · Int. J. Appl. Ceram. Technol. · 2015 · 12 · 176
39. 10.1007/s11431-014-5483-710.1007/s11431-014-5483-7 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.patrec.2004.11.00210.1016/j.patrec.2004.11.002 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.proeng.2012.01.87310.1016/j.proeng.2012.01.873 ↗
42. 10.2136/sssaj2003.136110.2136/sssaj2003.1361 ↗
43. 10.4015/S101623721750016810.4015/S1016237217500168 ↗
44. Stefano C. · 2008
45. 10.1016/j.chaos.2014.11.00910.1016/j.chaos.2014.11.009 ↗
46. 10.5194/npg-16-159-200910.5194/npg-16-159-2009 ↗
47. Yao B. · J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. · 2017 · 140 · 1
48. 10.1109/TMI.2006.87931610.1109/TMI.2006.879316 ↗