An investigation of the mechanical characteristics of natural particle‐reinforced glass and epoxy composites after immersion in acidic and basic aging solutions
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract This study aimed to ascertain the alterations in aging responses of fiber‐reinforced composites, as well as the effects of their natural particle reinforcement, through exposure to acidic and alkaline solutions. Specimens were produced with 0 wt. % (neat), 1 wt. %, 2 wt. % and 3 wt. % particle ratios from acorn and pinecone particles. A particle content of 2 wt. % was determined to yield the best mechanical properties in all mechanical tests conducted for pinecone reinforcement. The highest improvement in strength, observed in 3 wt. % pinecone‐reinforced composites, reached 22.5% at flexural strength. HCl and NaOH diluted in water were chosen as aging solutions. Mechanical tests were repeated at different stages of aging. According to the findings, 1 wt. % particle‐reinforced composites showed better resilience to the mechanical property reduction effect of aging compared to the 2 wt. % and 3 wt. % particle‐reinforced composites. At a particle ratio of 2 wt. %, the acorn‐reinforced specimens exhibit their highest maximum penetration force, which is 5% higher than that of the 0 wt. % composite, consistent with the results of tensile and compressive tests. Highlights Composite material was manufactured by hand lay‐up and vacuum bagging method. Specimens were aged using acid and base solutions. Tensile, compressive, and bending results were obtained depending on particle type and ratio. Tensile, compressive, and bending strengths of composites were compared according to various aging times.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences Dokuz Eylül University Izmir Turkey
Department of Mechanical Engineering Dokuz Eylül University Izmir Turkey
Funding
Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma Kurumu
References (56)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.07.36010.1016/j.matpr.2020.07.360 ↗
2. 10.24297/jac.v13i10.572010.24297/jac.v13i10.5720 ↗
3. 10.1002/app.5271410.1002/app.52714 ↗
4. Effects of an addition of coir‐pith particles on the mechanical properties and erosive‐wear behavior of a wood‐dust‐particle‐reinforced phenol formaldehyde composite
5. 10.5604/01.3001.0010.266410.5604/01.3001.0010.2664 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.proeng.2014.12.27910.1016/j.proeng.2014.12.279 ↗
7. 10.7234/kscm.2013.26.1.4810.7234/kscm.2013.26.1.48 ↗
8. 10.1080/15440478.2017.132369710.1080/15440478.2017.1323697 ↗
9. 10.1007/s42452‐019‐1286‐610.1007/s42452‐019‐1286‐6 ↗
10. 10.35940/ijitee.I7764.108121910.35940/ijitee.I7764.1081219 ↗
11. 10.1080/19443994.2013.85410510.1080/19443994.2013.854105 ↗
12. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.978.31610.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.978.316 ↗
13. 10.1007/s40034-020-00182-110.1007/s40034-020-00182-1 ↗
14. 10.1007/s40034-022-00243-710.1007/s40034-022-00243-7 ↗
15. 10.1177/0954406223116767410.1177/09544062231167674 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.matpr.2022.05.13610.1016/j.matpr.2022.05.136 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.03.03310.1016/j.matdes.2013.03.033 ↗
18. Fabrication of high density polyethylene composites reinforced with pine cone powder: mechanical and low velocity impact performances
19. Mechanical properties of acorn and pine cone filled polymer composites
20. 10.1016/0734-743X(96)89053-110.1016/0734-743X(96)89053-1 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2007.11.00110.1016/j.compstruct.2007.11.001 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2005.09.00110.1016/j.compstruct.2005.09.001 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2014.10.01310.1016/j.polymertesting.2014.10.013 ↗
24. 10.1002/pc.2357710.1002/pc.23577 ↗
25. 10.1515/mt-2021-004410.1515/mt-2021-0044 ↗
26. 10.3139/120.11093710.3139/120.110937 ↗
27. 10.3139/120.11142510.3139/120.111425 ↗
28. 10.1515/mt-2020-010610.1515/mt-2020-0106 ↗
29. 10.3139/120.11078610.3139/120.110786 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.matdes.2008.09.04410.1016/j.matdes.2008.09.044 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2013.08.03710.1016/j.compscitech.2013.08.037 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2014.01.01710.1016/j.compscitech.2014.01.017 ↗
33. Studies on the water absorption properties of short hemp—glass fiber hybrid polypropylene composites
34. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.10.03110.1016/j.compositesb.2014.10.031 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.02.01410.1016/j.matdes.2013.02.014 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.09.00210.1016/j.compositesa.2015.09.002 ↗
37. 10.1515/polyeng-2012-006310.1515/polyeng-2012-0063 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.11.00410.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.11.004 ↗
39. 10.1177/07316844910100050110.1177/073168449101000501 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2007.03.00410.1016/j.compscitech.2007.03.004 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.11.02510.1016/j.compstruct.2016.11.025 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.11.02510.1016/j.matdes.2012.11.025 ↗
43. Influence of hygrothermal aging on the quasi‐static and impact behavior of single lap joints using CFRP and aluminum substrates
44. 10.3390/molecules2419353810.3390/molecules24193538 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12192910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121929 ↗
46. 10.1002/app.4843410.1002/app.48434 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.01.03010.1016/j.compositesa.2018.01.030 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.07.01410.1016/j.compositesb.2015.07.014 ↗
49. 10.3390/polym1003024710.3390/polym10030247 ↗
50. Jawaid M · 2019
51. 10.1088/2053-1591/aac1cf10.1088/2053-1591/aac1cf ↗
52. 10.1088/2053-1591/aabf9910.1088/2053-1591/aabf99 ↗
53. 10.3390/polym1203061410.3390/polym12030614 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2013.01.01110.1016/j.ijimpeng.2013.01.011 ↗
55. 10.1177/109963621771922310.1177/1099636217719223 ↗
56. 10.1002/app.1046010.1002/app.10460 ↗