journal article·2023-06

Influence of alkali treatment on the interfacial shear strength of Agave lechuguilla fiber and its significance as a reinforcing material in polymer composites for mechanical applications

Sudhakar Majhi, Subhrajit Pradhan, Ved Prakash, Samir Kumar Acharya

Polymer Composites· Volume 44· Issue 6
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract The aim of the research work was to fabricate the short Agave lechuguilla (AL) fiber‐reinforced epoxy composite and to improve its mechanical strengths. In order to do that, a single fiber pullout test was conducted to evaluate the critical length of the AL fiber and its interfacial shear strength (IFSS) in epoxy resin. To improve the IFSS, AL fibers were treated with varying concentrations (5%, 10%, and 15%) of NaOH, and it was found that 5% NaOH treatment exhibits excellent tensile strength and IFSS. Fibers treated with 5% NaOH and untreated fibers were used separately as reinforcement materials varying between 10% and 40% with a 10 wt% step in composites fabrication. The tensile strength, flexural strength, and modulus of the composites were evaluated as per ASTM standards. The results reveal that the composites reinforced with 30 wt% of untreated AL fibers give maximum tensile and flexural strength. When 5% NaOH‐treated fibers were used as reinforcement instead of untreated fibers, their tensile and flexural strength improved by 8.14% and 7.88%, respectively. To investigate the fracture mechanism of the tested samples, the specimen's fractured surfaces were analyzed using scanning electron microscope and reported in this paper.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · Advanced Cellulose Research Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mechanical Engineering National Institute of Technology Rourkela Odisha 769008 India

References (62)

Show source-provided references
1. Begum K. · Res. J. Eng. Sci. · 2013 · 2 · 46
2. 10.1002/pc.2631210.1002/pc.26312 ↗
3. 10.1007/s11837-006-0234-210.1007/s11837-006-0234-2 ↗
4. Ferreira D. P. · 2018
5. 10.1002/pc.2641310.1002/pc.26413 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2009.04.01410.1016/j.compositesb.2009.04.014 ↗
7. Singh G. P. · J. Appl. Polym. Sci. · 2014 · 40829 · 1
8. Barbhuiya A. H. · J. Appl. Polym. Sci. · 2016 · 44142 · 1
9. 10.1002/pc.2574510.1002/pc.25745 ↗
10. 10.1007/s13369-018-3073-x10.1007/s13369-018-3073-x ↗
11. 10.1002/pen.2568310.1002/pen.25683 ↗
12. 10.1002/pc.2672710.1002/pc.26727 ↗
13. 10.1002/pc.2671310.1002/pc.26713 ↗
14. 10.1002/pc.2686610.1002/pc.26866 ↗
15. 10.1002/pc.2692410.1002/pc.26924 ↗
16. 10.1002/pls2.1006510.1002/pls2.10065 ↗
17. 10.1002/vnl.2178710.1002/vnl.21787 ↗
18. 10.1002/vnl.2170110.1002/vnl.21701 ↗
19. 10.1177/152808371665446810.1177/1528083716654468 ↗
20. 10.1002/pc.2621710.1002/pc.26217 ↗
21. 10.1002/pc.2614910.1002/pc.26149 ↗
22. 10.1002/pen.2132810.1002/pen.21328 ↗
23. 10.1016/S0266-3538(01)00046-X10.1016/S0266-3538(01)00046-X ↗
24. 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.11.07310.1016/j.biortech.2011.11.073 ↗
25. 10.1002/app.3133510.1002/app.31335 ↗
26. 10.1177/152808372094261410.1177/1528083720942614 ↗
27. 10.1080/09243046.2021.199356310.1080/09243046.2021.1993563 ↗
28. Samaei S. E. · J. Ind. Text. · 2022
29. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.10678210.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.106782 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.pnsc.2016.12.00410.1016/j.pnsc.2016.12.004 ↗
31. Pradhan S. · J. Nat. Fibers · 2022 · 00 · 1
32. 10.1163/15685540175325542210.1163/156855401753255422 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2008.03.01010.1016/j.compositesa.2008.03.010 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.08.02510.1016/j.compositesa.2016.08.025 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.12.01410.1016/j.compositesa.2005.12.014 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2010.01.00610.1016/j.compositesa.2010.01.006 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.06.06110.1016/j.matdes.2012.06.061 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.09.04310.1016/j.compstruct.2018.09.043 ↗
39. 10.1002/pc.2680010.1002/pc.26800 ↗
40. 10.1002/pc.2678210.1002/pc.26782 ↗
41. Maiti R. K. · Int. J. Bio‐Resour. Stress Manag. · 2011 · 2 · 105
42. 10.1023/A:102015812850610.1023/A:1020158128506 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.11.00810.1016/j.carbpol.2010.11.008 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.09.02810.1016/j.compositesb.2015.09.028 ↗
45. 10.1016/0022-5096(65)90035-910.1016/0022-5096(65)90035-9 ↗
46. 10.1007/s12666-021-02268-910.1007/s12666-021-02268-9 ↗
47. ASTM D638‐22 · 2022
48. ASTM D790‐17 · 2017
49. 10.1177/00405175590290100310.1177/004051755902901003 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.04.07510.1016/j.compositesb.2012.04.075 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.06.03710.1016/j.carbpol.2011.06.037 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2009.04.01810.1016/j.compositesb.2009.04.018 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2007.10.00210.1016/j.compositesa.2007.10.002 ↗
54. 10.1007/s12221-019-8492-010.1007/s12221-019-8492-0 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.01.07210.1016/j.carbpol.2018.01.072 ↗
56. 10.1002/app.5125410.1002/app.51254 ↗
57. 10.1002/app.5135010.1002/app.51350 ↗
58. Lopattananon N. · J. Appl. Polym. Sci. · 1974 · 2006 · 102
59. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.02.04210.1016/j.compositesb.2019.02.042 ↗
60. 10.1002/app.1046010.1002/app.10460 ↗
61. 10.1177/073168441243895410.1177/0731684412438954 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2005.04.00110.1016/j.compositesb.2005.04.001 ↗