Investigation on the bending behaviors of reinforced thermoplastic pipes using a strain energy equivalence method and a continuum damage numerical model
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract This paper investigates the bending stiffness and progressive failure of reinforced thermoplastic pipes (RTPs) under bending loads, in which a theoretical method based on the strain energy equivalence of multi‐layered anisotropic cylinders, is proposed. The bending stiffness and stress field was derived from the equilibrium between the work done by bending moments and the strain energy. This new method could consider the hybrid of isotropic and anisotropic materials and improve computation efficiency significantly. To verify the theoretical method, Abaqus/Explicit quasi‐static analysis on 3D composite elements was performed, in which the progressive failure was considered by using a VUMAT subroutine. The degradation of composites was implemented by a nonlinear stiffness degradation model based on the Hashin‐Yeh failure criterion. The comparison showed that the theoretical results are slightly conservative as the theoretical method neglects the contribution of interlayer interactions. Meanwhile, it can accurately predict the dominant stresses of each composite lamina. According to numerical simulations, the fiber tensile failure, the matrix tensile and compressive failure are the dominant failure modes of RTPs under bending loads. Furthermore, the effects of the winding angles of fibers on damage propagation and the effects of the initial ovality on the bending stiffness are also discussed.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
College of Engineering Ocean University of China Qingdao 266100 People's Republic of China
Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ocean Engineering Ocean University of China Qingdao 266100 People's Republic of China
References (60)
Show source-provided references
1. J. C.Price.in Proc. 12th Int. Offshore Polar Eng. Conf. Kitakyushu Japan; 2002:125–131.
2. L. G. P.Dalmolen M.Kruyer P. J.Cloos.in Proc. 4th Asian Conf. Exhibit. Kuala Lumpur; 2009:14.
3. 10.1016/0020-7683(80)90038-410.1016/0020-7683(80)90038-4 ↗
4. 10.1201/978149871106710.1201/9781498711067 ↗
5. J. G.Williams A.Sas‐Jaworsky.Offshore Technol. Conf. Houston Texas.2000.
6. B. O. Almroth D. O. Brush · 1975
7. 10.1016/0020-7683(88)90005-410.1016/0020-7683(88)90005-4 ↗
8. 10.1016/0020-7683(92)90139-K10.1016/0020-7683(92)90139-K ↗
9. 10.1115/1.402890410.1115/1.4028904 ↗
10. 10.1243/030932401151445810.1243/0309324011514458 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2004.03.00410.1016/j.compscitech.2004.03.004 ↗
12. Lekhnitskii S. G. · 1981
13. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1994)120:12(2556)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1994)120:12(2556) ↗
14. 10.1080/17445302.2017.137767410.1080/17445302.2017.1377674 ↗
15. Stefanovska M. · Int. J. Environ. Eng. · 2015 · 9 · 706
16. 10.1080/17445302.2013.83514710.1080/17445302.2013.835147 ↗
17. 10.1080/17445302.2014.93843410.1080/17445302.2014.938434 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.02.03010.1016/j.compstruct.2012.02.030 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.enganabound.2020.04.01210.1016/j.enganabound.2020.04.012 ↗
20. 10.1007/s12221-021-0875-310.1007/s12221-021-0875-3 ↗
21. 10.1177/07316844000190040210.1177/073168440001900402 ↗
22. S.Putić M.Stamenović M.Zrilić B.Bajčeta.Bending properties of Glass‐Polyester Composite Pipes.2007.
23. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2020.10617910.1016/j.compositesa.2020.106179 ↗
24. S.Jin S.Yuan T.Liu P.Han Y.Bai.Proc. ASME 37th Int. Conf. Ocean Offshore Arctic Eng. Volume 5: Pipelines Risers and Subsea Systems. Madrid Spain 2018 June 17–22.
25. 10.1177/002199831036517310.1177/0021998310365173 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11209710.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112097 ↗
27. P.Saga.University of Texas (Master dissertation).2007.
28. 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.10862310.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.108623 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.10900110.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.109001 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.10996310.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.109963 ↗
31. E. V.Morozov K.Yu.in 12th ISOPE Pacific/Asia Offshore Mech. Symp. Gold Coast Australia October 2016.
32. S. Y.Lin.Harbin Engineering University (PhD dissertation).2017.
33. Hastie J. C. · Ships Offshore Struct. · 2021 · 1975
34. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.10.03810.1016/j.compstruct.2013.10.038 ↗
35. Daniel I. M. · 2006
36. Shen G. L. · 2013
37. Aboudi J. · 2013 · 2013
38. 10.1007/s11802-021-4583-910.1007/s11802-021-4583-9 ↗
39. Sun X. F. · 2019
40. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2005.04.02010.1016/j.compstruct.2005.04.020 ↗
41. Langhaar H. L. · 2016
42. Goodno B. J. · 2019
43. Systèmes. D. · 2007 · 40
44. 10.1016/S0263-8223(02)00047-810.1016/S0263-8223(02)00047-8 ↗
45. 10.1002/pc.2603510.1002/pc.26035 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.01.01210.1016/j.compstruct.2013.01.012 ↗
47. 10.1007/s11802-021-4663-x10.1007/s11802-021-4663-x ↗
48. 10.1177/00219983730070040410.1177/002199837300700404 ↗
49. 10.1115/1.315366410.1115/1.3153664 ↗
50. 10.1115/1.315774410.1115/1.3157744 ↗
51. 10.1177/00219983940280100310.1177/002199839402801003 ↗
52. 10.1177/00219983980320020310.1177/002199839803200203 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2005.09.00110.1016/j.compstruct.2005.09.001 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11211910.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112119 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.05.05110.1016/j.compstruct.2016.05.051 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.11156010.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111560 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.10620310.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.106203 ↗
58. 10.1007/s13344-022-0054-310.1007/s13344-022-0054-3 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.ijnaoe.2018.09.00610.1016/j.ijnaoe.2018.09.006 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.11203710.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.112037 ↗