Splitting failure of a composite under longitudinal tension
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Significant variation can be found in measurements for the longitudinal tensile strength of the same unidirectional (UD) composite. A splitting failure is one of the main reasons. It is shown in this paper that the shear stress component resulted from a longitudinal tension and a fiber misalignment can cause the matrix to fail before fiber break. The misalignment angle consists of an initial off‐axial angle and a further fiber rotation during the loading. Based on the micromechanics Bridging Model and the matrix true stress theory established by the author, splitting failure has been analyzed and predicted rigorously in this paper, only using the fiber and matrix properties together with the fiber misalignment angle. The fiber initial misalignment angle of a unidirectional plate can be obtained from testing statistics, or deducing from measured longitudinal compression strength. Our research indicates that the longitudinal tensile strength and the relevant failure mode can be significantly affected by the fiber initial misalignment.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Fiber-reinforced polymer composites · Composite Material Mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Aerospace Engineering and Applied Mechanics, Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Education for Advanced Civil Engineering Materials Tongji University Shanghai China
College of Civil Engineering Tongji University Shanghai China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (56)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2015.01.00210.1016/j.compscitech.2015.01.002 ↗
2. 10.1016/0010-4361(90)90099-I10.1016/0010-4361(90)90099-I ↗
3. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2016.07.02310.1016/j.compscitech.2016.07.023 ↗
4. 10.1177/00219983980320220410.1177/002199839803202204 ↗
5. 10.1016/S1359-835X(00)00086-510.1016/S1359-835X(00)00086-5 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2005.01.00410.1016/j.compositesb.2005.01.004 ↗
7. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.2000.tb01166.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.2000.tb01166.x ↗
8. 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2002)14:4(320)10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2002)14:4(320) ↗
9. 10.1177/00219983810150020310.1177/002199838101500203 ↗
10. C.Kendall G. R.Doud ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition 2011 263.
11. A.Azizan H. A.Israr M. N.Tamin Effect of Fiber Misalignment on Tensile Response of Unidirectional CFRP Composite Lamina 2018.
12. 10.1520/CTR10099J10.1520/CTR10099J ↗
13. 10.1016/S0266-3538(98)00091-810.1016/S0266-3538(98)00091-8 ↗
14. Chang Y. S. · Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
15. 10.1177/07316844990180110510.1177/073168449901801105 ↗
16. 10.1177/00219983910250080210.1177/002199839102500802 ↗
17. Pickering K. L.10.1201/9780367813734-14 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.04.01810.1016/j.compositesa.2018.04.018 ↗
19. 10.1016/0266-3538(87)90016-910.1016/0266-3538(87)90016-9 ↗
20. J. H.Lee Uniaxial Compressive Behaviour of Carbon Fibre‐Epoxy Laminates—Part 1: Unnotched.2010 109.10.1007/978-3-642-13624-5_12 ↗
21. 10.1177/00219983940280170110.1177/002199839402801701 ↗
22. P.Davidson E. J.Pineda C.Henrich A. M.Waas.A Unified Model for Predicting the Open Hole Tensile and Compressive Strengths of Composite Laminates for Aerospace Applications. in Aiaa/asme/asce/ahs/asc Structures Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference.2013.10.2514/6.2013-1613 ↗
23. 10.1002/pc.2121410.1002/pc.21214 ↗
24. 10.1016/0020-7683(94)00157-R10.1016/0020-7683(94)00157-R ↗
25. 10.1016/S1359-835X(00)00115-910.1016/S1359-835X(00)00115-9 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2020.10623410.1016/j.compositesa.2020.106234 ↗
27. 10.1016/S0020-7683(00)00268-710.1016/S0020-7683(00)00268-7 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2013.08.01010.1016/j.ijmecsci.2013.08.010 ↗
29. 10.1142/S175882511650034410.1142/S1758825116500344 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.12.02110.1016/j.compositesa.2005.12.021 ↗
31. 10.1016/S0266-3538(03)00017-410.1016/S0266-3538(03)00017-4 ↗
32. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1994.tb04510.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1994.tb04510.x ↗
33. 10.1016/S0020-7683(98)00193-010.1016/S0020-7683(98)00193-0 ↗
34. 10.1002/pc.2654510.1002/pc.26545 ↗
35. 10.1002/pc.2545610.1002/pc.25456 ↗
36. 10.1002/pc.2513310.1002/pc.25133 ↗
37. 10.1002/pc.2570610.1002/pc.25706 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2020.07.02210.1016/j.ijsolstr.2020.07.022 ↗
39. 10.1177/002199831244988610.1177/0021998312449886 ↗
40. 10.1002/pc.2494310.1002/pc.24943 ↗
41. Zhou Y. · Appl. Compos. Mater. · 2021 · 1
42. 10.1177/002199831983921710.1177/0021998319839217 ↗
43. 10.1177/073168441881193810.1177/0731684418811938 ↗
44. 10.1002/pc.2304810.1002/pc.23048 ↗
45. 10.1002/pc.2505910.1002/pc.25059 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.06.00910.1016/j.compositesa.2014.06.009 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2012.03.01110.1016/j.compositesa.2012.03.011 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2011.06.00410.1016/j.compscitech.2011.06.004 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.06.01810.1016/j.compositesa.2015.06.018 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2018.12.04810.1016/j.commatsci.2018.12.048 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2021.10867010.1016/j.compscitech.2021.108670 ↗
52. 10.1016/S0266-3538(98)00078-510.1016/S0266-3538(98)00078-5 ↗
53. 10.1177/002199831349947710.1177/0021998313499477 ↗
54. Soutis C. · 2016 · 197
55. 10.1016/1359-8368(95)00010-010.1016/1359-8368(95)00010-0 ↗
56. 10.1111/j.1460-2695.1991.tb00670.x10.1111/j.1460-2695.1991.tb00670.x ↗