Dynamic properties of composite panel sandwiched by a perforated fiber reinforced damping film
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Composite panel sandwiched by a perforated fiber reinforced damping film (CPSPFRDF) is a novel damping treatment structure. Compared with conventional damping sandwich composites, CPSPFRDF has higher stiffness under the large damping. A ring deformation model is proposed to characterize the misalignment of fibers. A multi‐scale mathematical model is established by means of the analytical method of cell structure. The equivalent elastic parameters of the perforated fiber reinforced damping film are obtained. The complex stiffness method is applied to build the dynamic model of the structure. The validity of the theoretical model is verified by experiments. The relationships of design parameters with the dynamic properties of CPSPFRDF are revealed further. This study will provide a reference for the design and manufacture of the composites with large damping and high stiffness.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Vibration and Dynamic Analysis · Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization · Mechanical Behavior of Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Mechanical and Automotive Engineering Qingdao University of Technology Qingdao China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.10.01410.1016/j.compstruct.2015.10.014 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.05.01210.1016/j.compositesb.2012.05.012 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2009.09.04710.1016/j.compstruct.2009.09.047 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.01.07610.1016/j.compstruct.2018.01.076 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.01.01910.1016/j.compstruct.2017.01.019 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.10.08610.1016/j.compositesb.2018.10.086 ↗
7. 10.1121/1.190782110.1121/1.1907821 ↗
8. 10.1007/s10443-010-9141-310.1007/s10443-010-9141-3 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.euromechsol.2018.06.00810.1016/j.euromechsol.2018.06.008 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.tws.2005.06.00710.1016/j.tws.2005.06.007 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.03.02510.1016/j.compositesb.2015.03.025 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.09.01710.1016/j.compstruct.2014.09.017 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2006.07.00810.1016/j.ijmecsci.2006.07.008 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2007.04.02510.1016/j.compstruct.2007.04.025 ↗
15. Hou S. W. · Appl. Mech. Mater. · 2012 · 1520 · 20
16. Robinson M. J. · Proc. SPIE Smart Struct. Mater. · 2005 · 5760 · 349
17. 10.1016/j.tws.2020.10700010.1016/j.tws.2020.107000 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.03.06610.1016/j.compstruct.2018.03.066 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11242410.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112424 ↗
20. 10.1016/S0045-7949(01)00009-810.1016/S0045-7949(01)00009-8 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.compstruc.2007.02.00310.1016/j.compstruc.2007.02.003 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jsv.2019.04.02310.1016/j.jsv.2019.04.023 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.jsv.2011.01.01510.1016/j.jsv.2011.01.015 ↗
24. Beijing: Aviation Indus. Press · 1990 · 51
25. 10.2514/1.J05128710.2514/1.J051287 ↗
26. Jones R. M. · 1975 · 748
27. 10.1007/s10483-009-0111-y10.1007/s10483-009-0111-y ↗
28. 10.1006/jsvi.1995.024110.1006/jsvi.1995.0241 ↗