Medium‐term absorption kinetics and thermal stability analysis of hybrid fiber metal laminate and experimental investigations on its physical and tensile properties
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Fiber metal laminates (FML) are promising material candidates in several applications such as aerospace, marine, and construction industries due to their high strength, impact resistance, corrosion resistance, and fatigue properties. However, these materials have a negative impact on the environment due to their higher carbon footprint. This problem could be overcome by hybridizing carbon material with natural biodegradable materials. It is assumed that the higher moisture absorption and lower thermal properties of such materials may affect the long‐term stability of the FML. Hence, an attempt is made in this work to evaluate their stability potential by investigating the influence of the addition of natural jute fiber in carbon reinforced aluminum laminate (CARALL) on FML and report their physical effect of stacking sequence on dynamic, mechanical, and thermal properties. In addition, the medium‐term absorption kinetics of jute fiber hybridized CARALL, that is, carbon‐jute reinforced aluminum laminate (CAJRALL) were performed. The results show that the tensile load bearing capacity of all the immersed laminates decreases at the end of 2 weeks of immersion. Further, CAJRALL was found to possess moderate thermal stability by yielding fewer thermal residues on burning. Finally, the outcome of dynamic mechanical analysis of the hybridized FML reveals that they are capable of storing relatively higher elastic and viscous energies under dynamic conditions with increased damping capability when compared to CARALL. From this study, it is worth to point out that hybridization of CARALL with jute fiber plays a pivotal role in improving environmental friendliness with a lower impact on the overall material properties.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Tribology and Wear Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering Mount Zion College of Engineering and Technology Pudukkottai India
Department of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering Anna University Chennai India
Department of Materials and Production Engineering, The Sirindhorn International Thai‐German Graduate School of Engineering (TGGS) King Mongkut's University of Technology North Bangkok Bangkok Thailand
Design, Manufacturing & Engineering Management University of Strathclyde Glasgow UK
References (59)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s11356-020-08896-w10.1007/s11356-020-08896-w ↗
2. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e0513110.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05131 ↗
3. Bravo A. · 2021 · 39510.1002/9783527824083.ch13 ↗
4. Pulikkalparambil H. · 2021 · 1
5. 10.1016/j.fpsl.2020.10053810.1016/j.fpsl.2020.100538 ↗
6. Yorseng K. · Curr. Mater. Sci.: Formerly: Recent Patents Mater. Sci. · 2019 · 12 · 4
7. 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.07.44310.1016/j.matpr.2020.07.443 ↗
8. Hiremath N. · Mater. Today: Proc. · 2020 · 45 · 1
9. 10.3934/matersci.2017.3.81410.3934/matersci.2017.3.814 ↗
10. Kumar Rajak D. · 2021 · 8710.1002/9781119641803.ch7 ↗
11. Mugica J.I. Aretxabaleta L. Ulacia I. Mateos M.andAurrekoetxea J. 2012.Impact characterization and simulation of a FML based on a self‐reinforced polypropylene. Presented at: Proc. of the 15th European Conf. on Composite Materials Venice Italy 1.
12. 10.1016/j.matdes.2011.03.01110.1016/j.matdes.2011.03.011 ↗
13. 10.1016/S0924-0136(00)00411-810.1016/S0924-0136(00)00411-8 ↗
14. Gul S. · J. Renewable Mater. · 2020 · 8 · 130510.32604/jrm.2020.010037 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.matpr.2015.07.25310.1016/j.matpr.2015.07.253 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.10.07810.1016/j.matdes.2014.10.078 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.11.01210.1016/j.compscitech.2008.11.012 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2005.09.00810.1016/j.compstruct.2005.09.008 ↗
19. 10.1016/S0266-3538(97)00065-110.1016/S0266-3538(97)00065-1 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2009.09.00310.1016/j.compositesa.2009.09.003 ↗
21. 10.1016/S0266-3538(97)00076-610.1016/S0266-3538(97)00076-6 ↗
22. 10.1016/0961-9526(94)00014-Z10.1016/0961-9526(94)00014-Z ↗
23. 10.7317/pk.2016.40.5.74410.7317/pk.2016.40.5.744 ↗
24. 10.1590/S1516-1439200600030000210.1590/S1516-14392006000300002 ↗
25. Vasumathi M. · J. Polym. Mater. · 2016 · 33 · 53
26. 10.1016/j.proeng.2013.09.13110.1016/j.proeng.2013.09.131 ↗
27. Vasumathi M. · J. Polym. Mater. · 2014 · 31 · 39
28. 10.1016/S0266-3538(02)00005-210.1016/S0266-3538(02)00005-2 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.05.00510.1016/j.compositesb.2019.05.005 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2006.06.00210.1016/j.compositesb.2006.06.002 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.11176810.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111768 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.06.01910.1016/j.compositesb.2014.06.019 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.12.02910.1016/j.matdes.2012.12.029 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2014.06.03210.1016/j.indcrop.2014.06.032 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.10830010.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108300 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.11111710.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111117 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2021.10865110.1016/j.compscitech.2021.108651 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.10738810.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107388 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.03.06110.1016/j.matdes.2014.03.061 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.03.01410.1016/j.matdes.2014.03.014 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2019.10794910.1016/j.compscitech.2019.107949 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.04.01010.1016/j.matdes.2014.04.010 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.01.09610.1016/j.compositesb.2019.01.096 ↗
44. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.488-489.18210.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.488-489.182 ↗
45. 10.7317/pk.2020.44.4.43610.7317/pk.2020.44.4.436 ↗
46. Chandran V. · Mater. Sci. · 2016 · 22 · 256
47. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11304210.1016/j.compstruct.2020.113042 ↗
48. 10.1177/109963621878961310.1177/1099636218789613 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2020.10270910.1016/j.ijadhadh.2020.102709 ↗
50. 10.1201/978142000598110.1201/9781420005981 ↗
51. Standard test method for water absorption of plastics 2018.
52. Anter F. H. · Polymer · 2011 · 2 · 3
53. Standard test method for tensile propertiesof polymer matrix composite materials 2017.
54. Standard test method for transition temperatures and enthalpies of fusion and crystallization of polymers by differential scanning calorimetry 2015
55. Standard test method for compositional analysis by thermogravimetry 2020.
56. Standard test method for plastics: Dynamic mechancal properties: In Flexure (Dual Cantilever Beam) 2015.
57. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2009.04.01410.1016/j.compscitech.2009.04.014 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.10.00310.1016/j.compositesa.2011.10.003 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.jascer.2014.05.00510.1016/j.jascer.2014.05.005 ↗