journal article·2018-04

Chemical treatment of cotton stalk and its effects on mechanical, rheological and morphological properties of Polypropylene/cotton stalk bio‐composites

Abhishek Sachan, Veena Choudhary, K.K. Vimal, G.S. Kapur

Polymer Composites· Volume 39· Issue S1
Publisher page

Abstract

Cotton stalk as commercially viable bio fiber for preparing bio‐composites is explored of late, and the effects of various chemical treatments of cotton stalk fiber on mechanical, rheological and morphological properties of Polypropylene (PP)‐Cotton stalk (CS) bio‐composites are reported in this study. PP‐CS bio‐composites were prepared by varying the amount of cotton stalk from 10 to 50% by melt mixing in twin screw extruder and then injection molded to make specimen. PP‐CS bio‐composites with 50 wt% untreated CS were found to have maximum improvement in tensile modulus (83%), flexural modulus (120%), impact strength (39%). Similar to tensile and flexural modulus, the storage modulus of the PP‐CS composites was also increased with incorporation of CS into the PP matrix. To further increase the interaction between CS and PP matrix, four different chemical treatments (alkali, silane, permanganate solution and stearic acid) were tested for mechanical properties of CS‐PP bio‐composites. Among them KMnO4 treatment was found most effective on overall enhancement of bio‐composite properties. Chemically treated CS‐PP bio‐composites could be an economic viable option to prepare high quality low cost composites for suitable applications in various interior parts of automotives and house hold products. POLYM. COMPOS., 39:E286–E296, 2018. © 2017 Society of Plastics Engineers
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Indian Institute of technology, Hauz Khas New Delhi India

R&D Division Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Sector‐13 Faridabad Haryana India

References (55)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/(SICI)1439-2054(20000301)276:1<1::AID-MAME1>3.0.CO;2-W10.1002/(SICI)1439-2054(20000301)276:1<1::AID-MAME1>3.0.CO;2-W ↗
2. 10.1002/mame.20130000810.1002/mame.201300008 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2006.03.01110.1016/j.indcrop.2006.03.011 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.08.03110.1016/j.carbpol.2015.08.031 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.03510.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.035 ↗
6. 10.1002/mame.20140008910.1002/mame.201400089 ↗
7. Toiano V. · Die Angewandte Makromolekulare Chemie · 1995 · 233 · 14910.1002/apmc.1995.052330113 ↗
8. 10.1002/mame.20070031710.1002/mame.200700317 ↗
9. 10.1002/mame.20060011310.1002/mame.200600113 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.11.04310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.11.043 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2011.12.00710.1016/j.indcrop.2011.12.007 ↗
12. Ald M. · Appl. Energ. · 2012 · 93 · 25110.1016/j.apenergy.2011.11.065 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jaap.2011.05.01010.1016/j.jaap.2011.05.010 ↗
14. http://cotcrop.gov.in/national-cotton.aspx(29‐02‐2016).
15. Umesh D. · Curr. World Environ. · 2015 · 10 · 34310.12944/CWE.10.1.44 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2012.04.00310.1016/j.progpolymsci.2012.04.003 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.05.00110.1016/j.matdes.2012.05.001 ↗
18. 10.1007/s00107-009-0372-710.1007/s00107-009-0372-7 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.msea.2009.06.02010.1016/j.msea.2009.06.020 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.02.02610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.02.026 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2008.06.00410.1016/j.compositesa.2008.06.004 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2006.05.00310.1016/j.compositesb.2006.05.003 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.12.06810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.12.068 ↗
24. 10.1166/jbmb.2012.124410.1166/jbmb.2012.1244 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2004.02.00410.1016/j.compositesa.2004.02.004 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.matdes.2011.04.04410.1016/j.matdes.2011.04.044 ↗
27. 10.1590/0104-1428.172210.1590/0104-1428.1722 ↗
28. 10.1016/S0079-6700(98)00018-510.1016/S0079-6700(98)00018-5 ↗
29. Abdelmoulehm M. · Compos. Sci. Technol. · 2007 · 67 · 162710.1016/j.compscitech.2006.07.003 ↗
30. 10.1002/pc.2378310.1002/pc.23783 ↗
31. 10.1002/pc.2429710.1002/pc.24297 ↗
32. Guowenjing W. · Appl. Mech. Mater. · 2012 · 138 · 581
33. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.07.01810.1016/j.jclepro.2014.07.018 ↗
34. Wu Z. · Adv. Mater. Res. · 2012 · 482 · 92910.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.482-484.929 ↗
35. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.583.5310.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.583.53 ↗
36. Maria J. · Macromol. Mater. Eng. · 2006 · 219 · 405
37. 10.1002/mame.20070033710.1002/mame.200700337 ↗
38. C.QiandK.Gao “Effect of Thermal Treatment and Maleic Anhydride Grafted PE on the Interfacial Shear Stress Between Cotton Stalk and HDPE ” in Proceedings of BMSE Conference. Changsha 91–95 (2012).10.1109/BMSE.2012.6466188 ↗
39. A. K.BledzkiandJ.Gassan Handbook of Engineering Polymeric Materials Cheremisinoff New York 787–810(1998).
40. Mohanty A.K. · 2005 · 210.1201/9780203508206 ↗
41. A.Taylor “Case Study on Fibres in Composite Materials ” in Proceedings of DTI Conference. Centre London (2002).
42. 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.04.03110.1016/j.matdes.2013.04.031 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.polymer.2005.01.02710.1016/j.polymer.2005.01.027 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2006.03.01310.1016/j.polymertesting.2006.03.013 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.tca.2006.09.01310.1016/j.tca.2006.09.013 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2007.01.00410.1016/j.compositesa.2007.01.004 ↗
47. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.5b0064610.1021/acssuschemeng.5b00646 ↗
48. Chellappa V. · Polym. Compos. · 1996 · 17 · 43310.1002/pc.10632 ↗
49. 10.1122/1.55030610.1122/1.550306 ↗
50. 10.1002/app.2428910.1002/app.24289 ↗
51. Boyd R.H. · Polymer · 1984 · 26 · 32310.1016/0032-3861(85)90192-2 ↗
52. Muthuraj R. · Compos. A · 2016 · 83 · 12010.1016/j.compositesa.2015.09.003 ↗
53. 10.4186/ej.2009.13.3.4510.4186/ej.2009.13.3.45 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.09.00110.1016/j.compositesa.2005.09.001 ↗
55. 10.1016/S1359-835X(02)00020-910.1016/S1359-835X(02)00020-9 ↗