Controlling dielectric permittivity and dielectric loss by starch‐coated silver nanoparticles in ethylene–propylene rubber
Source abstract
Abstract
In this study, the effects of silver nanoparticles (AgNP) and starch‐coated ones (AgNP/starch) on dielectric properties of ethylene–propylene rubber (EPR) composites were compared. The dielectric permittivity of AgNP/EPR with 8 vol% of AgNP achieved 336 at 1 kHz which specifies the percolation threshold. AgNP/EPR composite with 6 vol% of filler as a near‐percolation sample was chosen to study the contribution of starch on dielectric properties. The AgNP/EPR composite showed relatively high dielectric permittivity and loss tangent ( , at 1 kHz), whereas AgNP/starch/EPR composite showed lower permittivity and loss ( , at 1 kHz), but with the advantage of more reduction in dielectric loss than dielectric permittivity. Moreover, better compatibility was observed between EPR and AgNP/starch particles, resulting in better dispersion of this coated filler, compared to AgNP. POLYM. COMPOS., 39:1303–1310, 2018. © 2016 Society of Plastics Engineers
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dielectric materials and actuators · Electromagnetic wave absorption materials · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Polymer Engineering Department, Faculty of Chemical Engineering Tarbiat Modares University P.O. Box 14115‐114, Tehran I.R. Iran
Department of Chemistry Tarbiat Modares University P.O. Box 14155‐4838, Tehran I.R. Iran
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2009.03.00310.1016/j.compscitech.2009.03.003 ↗
2. 10.1002/app.3536210.1002/app.35362 ↗
3. 10.1007/s10965-015-0805-410.1007/s10965-015-0805-4 ↗
4. 10.1002/app.3642810.1002/app.36428 ↗
5. 10.1002/adma.20130175210.1002/adma.201301752 ↗
6. 10.1002/app.3481810.1002/app.34818 ↗
7. Javadi S. · Polym. Compos. · 2015
8. 10.1109/TDEI.2008.465624010.1109/TDEI.2008.4656240 ↗
9. Ali A.F. · Polym. Compos. · 2015
10. 10.1021/am201045910.1021/am2010459 ↗
11. 10.1002/pc.2219010.1002/pc.22190 ↗
12. 10.1063/1.289457110.1063/1.2894571 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.11.02410.1016/j.compositesa.2011.11.024 ↗
14. 10.1063/1.277066410.1063/1.2770664 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2009.02.02010.1016/j.eurpolymj.2009.02.020 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2012.03.08210.1016/j.matchemphys.2012.03.082 ↗
17. 10.1039/b514182f10.1039/b514182f ↗
18. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.04.01910.1016/j.compscitech.2008.04.019 ↗
19. 10.1002/adma.20140131010.1002/adma.201401310 ↗
20. 10.1021/am201615610.1021/am2016156 ↗
21. 10.1002/adma.20060209710.1002/adma.200602097 ↗
22. 10.1002/adfm.20070020010.1002/adfm.200700200 ↗
23. 10.1002/pssa.20092547110.1002/pssa.200925471 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.cej.2014.06.08810.1016/j.cej.2014.06.088 ↗
25. Kumar B. · Bioinorg. Chem. Appl. · 2014
26. Kannaiyan S. · Int. J. ChemTech Res. · 2015 · 8 · 54
27. 10.1002/adma.20040181610.1002/adma.200401816 ↗
28. 10.1088/0964-1726/19/3/03501910.1088/0964-1726/19/3/035019 ↗
29. 10.1088/0953-8984/23/3/03510410.1088/0953-8984/23/3/035104 ↗
30. 10.1002/app.3904910.1002/app.39049 ↗