Performance evaluation of gamma‐ray irradiated silicone rubber nano‐micro composites using electrical, thermal, physiochemical and deep learning techniques
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Silicone rubber insulation used in nuclear power stations is inevitably exposed to highly energetic gamma‐ray irradiations which may lead to premature failure. Therefore, it is mandatory to develop silicone rubber composites capable of withstanding the stress posed by gamma‐ray irradiation. The present research involves the development of micro aluminum tri hydrate (ATH) and nano silica (SiO2) doped/co‐doped silicone rubber nanocomposites best suited for use in nuclear power stations. The samples were exposed to gamma‐ray irradiation of 500 kGy. Surface changes incurred were assessed using atomic force microscopy (AFM), fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, contact angle, surface potential/impedance, water droplet‐initiated corona inception voltage (CIV) measurements thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was adopted to characterize the thermal stability of the specimens. Further moisture absorption behavior of the test specimens under strong electrolytic NaCl solution has been investigated. The erosion resistance of the virgin and gamma‐ray irradiated specimens has been classified using GoogLeNet convolution neural network.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: High voltage insulation and dielectric phenomena · Electrical Fault Detection and Protection · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Electrical Engineering National Institute of Technology Warangal India
Department of Electrical Engineering Indian Institute of Technology Chennai India
Department of Electrical Engineering and Electronics Engineering Birla Institute of Technology Hyderabad India
Funding
Science and Engineering Research Board
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1109/TEI.1978.29812510.1109/TEI.1978.298125 ↗
2. 10.1002/pen.2561010.1002/pen.25610 ↗
3. 10.1002/pen.2595010.1002/pen.25950 ↗
4. 10.1088/1742-6596/2109/1/01202110.1088/1742-6596/2109/1/012021 ↗
5. Japan nuclear energy safety organization The final report of the project of “assessment of cable aging for nuclear power plants ” JNES‐SS‐0903 2009 1.
6. 10.1049/hve.2017.000910.1049/hve.2017.0009 ↗
7. 10.1109/TDEI.2009.512852410.1109/TDEI.2009.5128524 ↗
8. Yang L. · 2017 · 98
9. 10.1016/S0168-583X(99)00138-X10.1016/S0168-583X(99)00138-X ↗
10. 10.3390/polym910053310.3390/polym9100533 ↗
11. 10.1016/S0168-583X(03)00626-810.1016/S0168-583X(03)00626-8 ↗
12. 10.1109/TDEI.2013.00417710.1109/TDEI.2013.004177 ↗
13. Momen G. · Rev.Adv.Mater.Sci. · 2011 · 9 · 1
14. 10.1109/TDEI.2004.132435210.1109/TDEI.2004.1324352 ↗
15. 10.1109/94.91993010.1109/94.919930 ↗
16. 10.1109/TDEI.2010.544812010.1109/TDEI.2010.5448120 ↗
17. 10.1109/TDEI.2016.773684010.1109/TDEI.2016.7736840 ↗
18. Khan H. · 2017 · 15
19. Rashid A. · 2019 · 1
20. Dengke C. · 2004 · 800
21. 10.1049/hve.2018.500410.1049/hve.2018.5004 ↗
22. 10.1109/61.85302210.1109/61.853022 ↗
23. 10.1109/TDEI.2021.00961710.1109/TDEI.2021.009617 ↗
24. 10.1109/TPWRD.2021.311648910.1109/TPWRD.2021.3116489 ↗
25. 10.1109/TIM.2019.295630010.1109/TIM.2019.2956300 ↗
26. 10.1109/TDEI.2016.773684210.1109/TDEI.2016.7736842 ↗
27. 10.1109/TDEI.2014.00447610.1109/TDEI.2014.004476 ↗
28. IEC 60112 “Recommended method for determining the comparative tracking index of solid insulating material under moist condition” 1972 2nd edition.