journal article·2022-07Open access

Evaluation of robotic fiber placement effect on process‐induced residual stresses using incremental hole‐drilling method

Mohamed M. A. Ammar, Bijan Shirinzadeh

Polymer Composites· Volume 43· Issue 7

Abstract

Abstract The robotic fiber placement (RFP) process depends on continuous fusion bonding and solidifying of prepreg tows onto a substrate by subjecting them to a compression force and heat flux. However the advantages provided when using the RFP to fabricate the composite structures, it has adverse effects due to the induced residual stresses (RSs). The current work presents the effect of the RFP on the induced RSs in thermoset composites. RFP is utilized to fabricate specimens from carbon fiber reinforced polymers. Effects of placement speed, compression force, heating temperature, heating gas flowrate, and the location of the heat flux outlet nozzle are all included in the present study. A total of 69 flat panels are manufactured under different process conditions. Subsequently, the in‐depth RSs are measured using the incremental hole‐drilling method. Besides, the microstructures of the samples are also analyzed. The results show that the change in process parameters could significantly affect the induced RSs of the thermoset composites. Subjecting the samples to higher thermal and pressure loads would induce more RSs, which are attributed to the occurrence of partial curing during the manufacturing process along with the change in laminate geometry and porosity.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced machining processes and optimization · Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques · Advanced Machining and Optimization Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Robotics and Mechatronics Research Laboratory, Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Monash University Clayton Australia

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering Alexandria University Alexandria Egypt

Funding

Australian Research Council

References (55)

Show source-provided references
1. Elkington M. · Adv. Manuf.: Polym. Compos. Sci. · 2015 · 1 · 138
2. Sudbury T. Z. · Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. · 2016 · 90 · 1659
3. 10.1016/S0735-1933(01)00212-310.1016/S0735-1933(01)00212-3 ↗
4. 10.1016/0254-0584(95)01554-X10.1016/0254-0584(95)01554-X ↗
5. 10.1002/pc.75013060510.1002/pc.750130605 ↗
6. 10.1007/s00170-010-3028-110.1007/s00170-010-3028-1 ↗
7. 10.1017/S026357470200414910.1017/S0263574702004149 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.addma.2017.01.00310.1016/j.addma.2017.01.003 ↗
9. 10.1016/S0736-5845(03)00050-410.1016/S0736-5845(03)00050-4 ↗
10. 10.1016/S1359-835X(99)00054-810.1016/S1359-835X(99)00054-8 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.addma.2015.02.00310.1016/j.addma.2015.02.003 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.rcim.2009.04.00210.1016/j.rcim.2009.04.002 ↗
13. August Z. · SAMPE J. · 2014 · 50 · 30
14. 10.1016/j.rcim.2017.08.00510.1016/j.rcim.2017.08.005 ↗
15. K. N.Segal C. C.He W. E.Guin J. R.Jackson R. W.Grenoble T. N.Nguyen L.Nelson.Int. SAMPE Tech. Conf;2019. p.15.
16. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.11.09010.1016/j.compstruct.2018.11.090 ↗
17. 10.1177/0967391111019002-30710.1177/0967391111019002-307 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.matdes.2017.04.00810.1016/j.matdes.2017.04.008 ↗
19. Withers P. J. · Meas. Tech. · 2001 · 17 · 355
20. 10.1016/S0266-3538(97)00048-110.1016/S0266-3538(97)00048-1 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.proeng.2018.02.06110.1016/j.proeng.2018.02.061 ↗
22. 10.1007/BF0135076610.1007/BF01350766 ↗
23. 10.1520/MPC2017011110.1520/MPC20170111 ↗
24. 10.1177/002199832090863110.1177/0021998320908631 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.07.04010.1016/j.compstruct.2018.07.040 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.10557510.1016/j.compositesa.2019.105575 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2016.05.00210.1016/j.compscitech.2016.05.002 ↗
28. 10.1163/156855104258018110.1163/1568551042580181 ↗
29. 10.1007/s11340-009-9329-310.1007/s11340-009-9329-3 ↗
30. Chiang C. C. · J. Nanomater. · 2013
31. M. A.Umarfarooq P. S. S.Gouda A.Nandibewoor N. R.Banapurmath G. B. V.Kumar.AIP Conf. Proc;2019.
32. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2019.10614710.1016/j.polymertesting.2019.106147 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2016.05.02510.1016/j.ijmecsci.2016.05.025 ↗
34. 10.1016/S0266-3538(03)00278-110.1016/S0266-3538(03)00278-1 ↗
35. 10.1177/00219980303105710.1177/002199803031057 ↗
36. 10.1007/s40799-016-0152-310.1007/s40799-016-0152-3 ↗
37. 10.1108/0144515001035324210.1108/01445150010353242 ↗
38. 10.1088/1757-899X/859/1/01201810.1088/1757-899X/859/1/012018 ↗
39. 10.5937/fmet1801108H10.5937/fmet1801108H ↗
40. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11397610.1016/j.compstruct.2021.113976 ↗
41. M. M. A.Ammar B.Shirinzadeh 24th Int. Conf. Mechatronics Technology (ICMT) 2022 pp.1–6.10.1109/ICMT53429.2021.9687161 ↗
42. ASTM E837‐13a.Standard Test Method for Determining Residual Stresses by the Hole‐Drilling Strain‐Gage Method;2013.
43. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.996.30110.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.996.301 ↗
44. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.681.51010.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.681.510 ↗
45. Systemes D. · 2013
46. Nasr M. N. A. · 2017 · 134
47. 10.1007/s12289-010-0688-110.1007/s12289-010-0688-1 ↗
48. 10.1016/0266-3538(89)90083-310.1016/0266-3538(89)90083-3 ↗
49. 10.1002/pi.121710.1002/pi.1217 ↗
50. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.996.28310.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.996.283 ↗
51. 10.1115/1.322606010.1115/1.3226060 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11192610.1016/j.compstruct.2020.111926 ↗
53. 10.1007/s11340-015-0082-510.1007/s11340-015-0082-5 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2014.01.00810.1016/j.compscitech.2014.01.008 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.08.05410.1016/j.compositesb.2018.08.054 ↗