One‐step fabrication of bulk nanocomposites reinforced by carbon nanotube array fragments
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Vertically aligned carbon nanotube (VACNT) array growth is an established process where high aspect ratio carbon nanotubes (CNTs) are produced. This work demonstrates one‐step approach to fabricate bulk polymer nanocomposites using CNT array fragments'. Here, 4.5 mm long CNTs were collected post VACNTs synthesis. Next, CNT array fragments were coated with pyrolytic carbon (PyC) and infused with polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) matrix to create porous CNT/PDMS nanocomposite with a CNT weight fraction of 20%. Achieving similar weight fraction with super long bundled CNTs using dispersion techniques is extremely difficult. The compression and dynamic mechanical behaviors and piezoresistive response of the PDMS filled nanocomposite were assessed. The results revealed the potential of the synthesized structure to serve as fatigue‐resistant pressure sensors with high damping and self‐sensing capabilities. The proposed fabrication technique is versatile, as it can work with thermosetting and thermoplastic polymers in addition to allowing for mass production of PDMS filled nanocomposites.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Conducting polymers and applications · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Textile Engineering, Chemistry and Science North Carolina State University Raleigh North Carolina USA
Textile Engineering Department Alexandria University Alexandria Egypt
Department of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering North Carolina State University Raleigh North Carolina USA
References (66)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.7567/APEX.10.02510310.7567/APEX.10.025103 ↗
2. 10.1021/la902843610.1021/la9028436 ↗
3. 10.1186/1556-276X-8-54610.1186/1556-276X-8-546 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.carbon.2006.02.03810.1016/j.carbon.2006.02.038 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.envint.2013.04.00310.1016/j.envint.2013.04.003 ↗
6. 10.1038/nnano.2011.3610.1038/nnano.2011.36 ↗
7. MiaoLu AmineBermak Yi‐KuenLee 2007 IEEE 20th Int. Conf. Micro Electro Mech. Syst. MEMS IEEE Hyogo Japan 2007 pp.251–254.10.1109/MEMSYS.2007.4433102 ↗
8. JunyongLu MiaoLu A.Bermak Yi‐KuenLee 2007 7th IEEE Conf. Nanotechnol. IEEE NANO IEEE Hong Kong Hong Kong 2007 pp.1240–1243.10.1109/NANO.2007.4601407 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.carbon.2010.08.04810.1016/j.carbon.2010.08.048 ↗
10. 10.1016/S0032-3861(02)00151-910.1016/S0032-3861(02)00151-9 ↗
11. 10.3144/expresspolymlett.2007.3910.3144/expresspolymlett.2007.39 ↗
12. Y.Zhao E.Cabrera T.Kuang D.Zhang W.Yang J. M.Castro A.Benatar L. J.Lee inSPE ANTEC Anaheim 2017 pp.798–803.
13. 10.1002/pc.2581310.1002/pc.25813 ↗
14. 10.1002/pc.2583810.1002/pc.25838 ↗
15. 10.1002/pc.2537810.1002/pc.25378 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.carbon.2011.06.08910.1016/j.carbon.2011.06.089 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.12.10410.1016/j.compositesb.2018.12.104 ↗
18. 10.1039/C5NR03899E10.1039/C5NR03899E ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2020.06.02010.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2020.06.020 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2020.12.03510.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2020.12.035 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.02.04910.1016/j.matdes.2016.02.049 ↗
22. Johnston I. D. · Microengineering · 2014 · 24 · 5017
23. 10.1021/nl801271510.1021/nl8012715 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.carbon.2011.03.01210.1016/j.carbon.2011.03.012 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.carbon.2015.09.08910.1016/j.carbon.2015.09.089 ↗
26. 10.1021/acsnano.7b0857710.1021/acsnano.7b08577 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.08.00310.1016/j.compositesa.2016.08.003 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.11.00210.1016/j.compositesb.2016.11.002 ↗
29. 10.1177/002199831775412810.1177/0021998317754128 ↗
30. Ma C. · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2017 · 19 · 9468
31. 10.1002/app.1984.07029122610.1002/app.1984.070291226 ↗
32. Liu H. · J. Mater. Chem. C · 2018 · 6 · 121
33. 10.1039/c0jm03814h10.1039/c0jm03814h ↗
34. 10.1039/c3nr00753g10.1039/c3nr00753g ↗
35. 10.1016/j.polymer.2018.02.02010.1016/j.polymer.2018.02.020 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.polymer.2007.06.04610.1016/j.polymer.2007.06.046 ↗
37. 10.1002/adfm.20120199910.1002/adfm.201201999 ↗
38. 10.1002/pen.2087710.1002/pen.20877 ↗
39. Eriksson M. · NANO · 2015 · 1 · 36
40. 10.1021/ma702236410.1021/ma7022364 ↗
41. 10.3139/9783446434141.00610.3139/9783446434141.006 ↗
42. Tang L.‐C. · 2019 · 36710.1016/B978-0-12-817342-8.00012-3 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.carbon.2014.07.04910.1016/j.carbon.2014.07.049 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.carbon.2010.04.00910.1016/j.carbon.2010.04.009 ↗
45. 10.3390/nano811094510.3390/nano8110945 ↗
46. 10.1039/C4TC01037J10.1039/C4TC01037J ↗
47. Böhning M. · 2019 · 13910.1016/B978-0-12-817342-8.00006-8 ↗
48. 10.1080/19475411.2015.112163210.1080/19475411.2015.1121632 ↗
49. M.Kallio The Elastic and Damping Properties of Magnetorheological Elastomers VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland 2005.
50. 10.5254/1.353849210.5254/1.3538492 ↗
51. Taheri M. · Prog. Petrochem. Sci. · 2018 · 3 · 269
52. 10.12989/imm.2011.4.3.23910.12989/imm.2011.4.3.239 ↗
53. Rui Li · Nanomech. Micromech. · 2014 · 4 · 3014
54. 10.3390/polym1009099910.3390/polym10090999 ↗
55. 10.3390/c302001010.3390/c3020010 ↗
56. 10.1002/marc.20090017410.1002/marc.200900174 ↗
57. 10.1002/mame.20090013110.1002/mame.200900131 ↗
58. 10.1088/0964-1726/21/10/10503610.1088/0964-1726/21/10/105036 ↗
59. 10.1039/C4RA08852B10.1039/C4RA08852B ↗
60. 10.1016/j.jcis.2019.05.04310.1016/j.jcis.2019.05.043 ↗
61. 10.1021/nn103104g10.1021/nn103104g ↗
62. 10.5937/STR1604015S10.5937/STR1604015S ↗
63. 10.1016/j.tsf.2009.03.14610.1016/j.tsf.2009.03.146 ↗
64. 10.1016/j.sna.2009.01.02610.1016/j.sna.2009.01.026 ↗
65. 10.1177/073168441561408710.1177/0731684415614087 ↗
66. 10.1177/1045389X1558065810.1177/1045389X15580658 ↗