Numerical investigations of microscopic characteristic influences on the mechanical properties of polymer‐matrix composites
Source abstract
Abstract
In this study, an isoparametric micro‐mechanical model is developed to study the failure behaviors under biaxial loadings for composites with different fiber arrangements. For validating the method, the numerical results of the unidirectional (UD) composite lamina with consideration of two different failure criteria (the constituent failure criterion and UD failure criterion) are compared with the experimental results. On this basis, the fiber arrangements and fiber off‐axis angles influence on the failure envelopes for the UD composite lamina are studied. Furthermore, the failure strength of a typical composite laminates is also investigated. The results show that the failure strength of composite laminates is closely dependent on the fiber arrangements. Compared with the hexagonal packing, the square diagonal packing provides the higher failure strengths. POLYM. COMPOS., 38:2734–2742, 2017. © 2015 Society of Plastics Engineers
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Composite Material Mechanics · Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Electronic Equipment Structure Design Xidian University Xi'an 710071 China
State Key Laboratory for Manufacturing Systems Engineering Xi'an Jiaotong University Xi'an 710049 China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/pc.2103510.1002/pc.21035 ↗
2. 10.3109/00016357.2014.95887510.3109/00016357.2014.958875 ↗
3. 10.1155/2014/39659710.1155/2014/396597 ↗
4. 10.1080/15685543.2015.98452110.1080/15685543.2015.984521 ↗
5. 10.1080/15685543.2013.76301010.1080/15685543.2013.763010 ↗
6. 10.1002/pc.2249310.1002/pc.22493 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.02.04210.1016/j.compstruct.2015.02.042 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2014.12.00210.1016/j.ijsolstr.2014.12.002 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2013.08.02710.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2013.08.027 ↗
10. Aboudi J. · 1991
11. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.02.03010.1016/j.compstruct.2015.02.030 ↗
12. 10.1002/pc.2299710.1002/pc.22997 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2014.08.04510.1016/j.commatsci.2014.08.045 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2013.11.02210.1016/j.compscitech.2013.11.022 ↗
15. Zhai Z. · J. Reinf. Plast. Compos. · 2013 · 25 · 403
16. Zhai Z. · Sensor. Mater. · 2014 · 33 · 1574
17. J.Aboudi M.J.Pindera andS.M.Arnold High‐Fidelity Generalized Method of Cells for Inelastic Periodic Multiphase Materials NASA Contractor Report TM‐2002‐211469 (2002).
18. 10.1016/S0749-6419(02)00007-410.1016/S0749-6419(02)00007-4 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2009.02.00410.1016/j.ijsolstr.2009.02.004 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.09.02810.1016/j.compstruct.2013.09.028 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2015.05.01910.1016/j.ijsolstr.2015.05.019 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2012.11.00910.1016/j.ijsolstr.2012.11.009 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2005.04.01210.1016/j.ijplas.2005.04.012 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2008.09.00310.1016/j.ijplas.2008.09.003 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2014.01.05310.1016/j.commatsci.2014.01.053 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.02.00610.1016/j.compositesb.2012.02.006 ↗
27. 10.1115/1.272231210.1115/1.2722312 ↗
28. Gosz M.R. · 2005
29. 10.1016/B978-0-12-397035-0.00005-710.1016/B978-0-12-397035-0.00005-7 ↗
30. Chandrupatla T.R. · 2013
31. 10.1016/S0266-3538(98)00078-510.1016/S0266-3538(98)00078-5 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.01.00310.1016/j.compositesb.2012.01.003 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2007.05.00510.1016/j.compositesb.2007.05.005 ↗
34. 10.1515/secm-2013-010510.1515/secm-2013-0105 ↗
35. 10.1007/978-94-011-3670-910.1007/978-94-011-3670-9 ↗