journal article·2017-01

Thermal, static, and dynamic mechanical properties of bark cloth (ficus brachypoda) laminar epoxy composites

Samson Rwawiire, Blanka Tomkova

Polymer Composites· Volume 38· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

Bark cloth is a natural nonwoven fibrous fabric produced in Uganda from three species of trees: Ficus natalensis, Ficus brachypoda, and Antiaris toxicaria. The recently developed bark cloth composites has created a new class of textile composites which can find applications in interior automotive panels. Four bark cloth plies were utilized, the resin was infused using Vacuum Assisted Resin Transfer Molding (VARTM). Scanning Electron Microscopy was used to study the fabric's fiber morphology, surface functional groups were characterized using Fourier Transform Infrared. Overall, the static and the Dynamical mechanical analysis showed that the developed composites had a tensile strength ranging from 22 to 29 MPa whereas the flexural strength ranging from 45 to 100 MPa. The glass transition temperature of the composites was ranging from 53°C to 63°C. POLYM. COMPOS., 38:199–204, 2017. © 2015 Society of Plastics Engineers
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Textile materials and evaluations · Advanced Cellulose Research Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Material Engineering Technical University of Liberec Studentská 2, 461 17 Liberec

Department of Textile and Ginning Engineering Busitema University Tororo Uganda

Funding

Small Theses & Dissertation Grant (Association of African Universities) and Technical University of Liberec (Doctoral Study Scholarship)

References (21)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/(SICI)1439-2054(20000301)276:1<1::AID-MAME1>3.0.CO;2-W10.1002/(SICI)1439-2054(20000301)276:1<1::AID-MAME1>3.0.CO;2-W ↗
2. 10.1201/978020350820610.1201/9780203508206 ↗
3. Joshi S.V. · S. Compos. Part A · 2004 · 35 · 3
4. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.01.01710.1016/j.compositesa.2011.01.017 ↗
5. 10.1016/S0266-3538(03)00096-410.1016/S0266-3538(03)00096-4 ↗
6. Bledzki A.K. · Macromol. Mater. Eng. · 2006 · 291 · 5
7. 10.1177/152808370934712410.1177/1528083709347124 ↗
8. Ming M. · Adv. Mater. Res. · 2011 · 332
9. 10.1177/004051750606339310.1177/0040517506063393 ↗
10. 10.1300/J237v07n02_0110.1300/J237v07n02_01 ↗
11. 10.1007/978-3-642-17370-7_2310.1007/978-3-642-17370-7_23 ↗
12. 10.1155/2013/92519810.1155/2013/925198 ↗
13. 10.1080/00405000.2013.84384910.1080/00405000.2013.843849 ↗
14. S.RwawiireandB.Tomkova. Comparative evaluation of thermal conductivity of bark cloth epoxy composites inProceedings of the Fiber Society Conference Liberec(Vol. 21) (2014).
15. 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.01.02510.1016/j.matdes.2014.01.025 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.11.07710.1016/j.matdes.2013.11.077 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2012.03.03710.1016/j.indcrop.2012.03.037 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.msea.2012.05.10910.1016/j.msea.2012.05.109 ↗
19. 10.1002/pc.2231310.1002/pc.22313 ↗
20. 10.1002/pc.2258010.1002/pc.22580 ↗
21. 10.1016/S1359-835X(98)00049-910.1016/S1359-835X(98)00049-9 ↗