Mechanical failure analysis of pultrusion glass fiber pipe based on acoustic emission technology
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract In this study, the mechanical properties and damage modes of pultruded glass fiber/unsaturated polyester composite square pipe for automotive parts were investigated. The pipe structure, fiber mass content, dynamic mechanical analysis, tensile, and bending properties and acoustic emission detection damage mechanism of pultruded glass fiber composite pipe were studied. The structure of the cross‐section of the pultrusion pipe is like a sandwich composed of mat layers on both surfaces and a unidirectional fiber layer in middle. Based on the failure analysis of pipe by acoustic emission signal technology, it is found that the tensile damage process was considered into four stages, initial damage, mat layer fracture, intermediate damage, and fiber fracture; while the bending damage process can be divided into two stages as initial and overall damages.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Smart Materials for Construction · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
College of Materials and Textile Engineering Jiaxing University Jiaxing China
Key Laboratory of Textile Science and Technology Donghua University Shanghai China
Multi layer Technology Institute Co. Otu city Japan
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.12.104710.1016/j.matpr.2020.12.1047 ↗
2. Bhm R. · Materials · 2020 · 13 · 16
3. 10.1007/s42154-019-00086-w10.1007/s42154-019-00086-w ↗
4. Starke J. · 2016
5. Sim K. B. · Polymers · 2020 · 12 · 3
6. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11386410.1016/j.compstruct.2021.113864 ↗
7. Khan L. A. · 2016 · 93
8. Strong A. B. · Int. J. Microstruct. Mater. Prop. · 2007 · 2 · 251
9. Mallick P. K. · Materials · 2010 · 208
10. Dong C. J. · J. Compos. Mater. · 2006 · 40 · 13
11. Peterson L. · Int. Congress Expo. · 2001 · 3
12. Ogale A. · JEC Compos. · 2011 · 36
13. 10.1002/pc.2631210.1002/pc.26312 ↗
14. 10.1002/pc.2647810.1002/pc.26478 ↗
15. 10.1002/pc.2696110.1002/pc.26961 ↗
16. Qiao Y. · Polym. Compos. · 2022
17. 10.1002/pc.2604510.1002/pc.26045 ↗
18. 10.1002/pc.2682410.1002/pc.26824 ↗
19. 10.1002/pc.2641310.1002/pc.26413 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.12.07910.1016/j.compstruct.2017.12.079 ↗
21. 10.1177/002199832092289410.1177/0021998320922894 ↗
22. 10.4236/ojcm.2019.9402110.4236/ojcm.2019.94021 ↗
23. Imai Y. · Open J. Compos. Mater. · 2019 · 9 · 14
24. Rong J. · Compos. Mater. · 2020 · 37 · 2782
25. Hui X. · Int. Combust. Engines Access. · 2019 · 17 · 134
26. Mehdikhani M. · Composites · 2018 · 154
27. Eshelby J. D. · Math. Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc. · 1977 · 81 · 2
28. Wang J. · 2006
29. Xiang H. · Acta. Mater. Compos. Sin. · 2021 · 38 · 4
30. 10.1007/978-94-011-0543-910.1007/978-94-011-0543-9 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2007.12.00210.1016/j.compscitech.2007.12.002 ↗
32. Ely T. M. · Mater. Eval. · 1995 · 53 · 2
33. Kaiser J. · Tech. Hochsch. · 1959 · 5