journal article·2022-09

Design of the composite hydraulic cylinder with geodesic dome trajectory: A numerical study

Taner Coskun, Omer Sinan Sahin

Polymer Composites· Volume 43· Issue 9
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Hydraulic cylinders are used in many different areas from aviation to construction machinery and are generally manufactured using conventional steels that stand out with their low strength to weight ratio. In this study, it was aimed to design a hydraulic cylinder using composite materials to reduce cylinder weight. In this context, a novel composite hydraulic cylinder was designed, and numerical analyses for the composite portions of the hydraulic cylinder were carried out. For the numerical model, an aluminium liner and cylinder heads with the geodesic dome profiles were used, and composite layers were formed on their surfaces by using the Ansys ACP module. In the numerical analyses, the design parameters such as fabric materials and liner thickness were optimized using response surface optimization, and thus the optimum design parameters were determined. The results were verified by comparing the statistical‐based optimization and numerical analysis results. On the other hand, the wall thickness for the steel hydraulic cylinder, which has the same strength as the composite cylinder, was determined and the structure weights have been compared. As a result of the current study, it has been revealed that composite hydraulic cylinders with the same strength as steel hydraulic cylinders can be designed. With the utilization of the composite materials, it has been observed that composite hydraulic cylinder is 53.78% lighter than conventional hydraulic cylinders. Furthermore, the advantages and disadvantages of the novel composite hydraulic cylinder were discussed, and it was found to be feasible for industrial applications in which system weights are the major problem.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Vibration and Dynamic Analysis · Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mechanical Engineering Konya Technical University Konya Turkey

References (47)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.3390/polym710150110.3390/polym7101501 ↗
2. 10.1002/pc.2647910.1002/pc.26479 ↗
3. 10.1016/S0263-8223(99)00044-610.1016/S0263-8223(99)00044-6 ↗
4. 10.1177/002199831987058810.1177/0021998319870588 ↗
5. 10.15623/ijret.2012.010100210.15623/ijret.2012.0101002 ↗
6. 10.1016/0263-8223(95)00089-510.1016/0263-8223(95)00089-5 ↗
7. 10.1002/pc.2624310.1002/pc.26243 ↗
8. 10.1002/pc.2530410.1002/pc.25304 ↗
9. 10.1002/pc.2318310.1002/pc.23183 ↗
10. 10.1016/0010-4361(95)90918-P10.1016/0010-4361(95)90918-P ↗
11. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11472610.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114726 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.01.04710.1016/j.compstruct.2018.01.047 ↗
13. 10.1080/15376494.2020.180015410.1080/15376494.2020.1800154 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.02.03710.1016/j.compstruct.2016.02.037 ↗
15. Pramod R. · Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. L: J. Mater.: Des. Appl. · 2022 · 236 · 1130
16. 10.1142/S175882512150074510.1142/S1758825121500745 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.11558510.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115585 ↗
18. Coskun T. · Ata Univ. J. Inst. Sci. Technol. · 2022 · 5 · 117
19. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11452010.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114520 ↗
20. 10.1680/jemmr.18.0009310.1680/jemmr.18.00093 ↗
21. 10.1177/002199832096979910.1177/0021998320969799 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.tws.2021.10867210.1016/j.tws.2021.108672 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.11573210.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115732 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.03.06310.1016/j.compstruct.2018.03.063 ↗
25. 10.1007/s00158-009-0417-x10.1007/s00158-009-0417-x ↗
26. 10.1007/s00158-008-0344-210.1007/s00158-008-0344-2 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2016.09.02810.1016/j.ijmecsci.2016.09.028 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.01.05210.1016/j.compstruct.2016.01.052 ↗
29. 10.1007/s12541-018-0010-610.1007/s12541-018-0010-6 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.11.02110.1016/j.compstruct.2018.11.021 ↗
31. 10.1007/s10443-017-9638-010.1007/s10443-017-9638-0 ↗
32. 10.1007/s10443-019-09772-810.1007/s10443-019-09772-8 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.11154410.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111544 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11280610.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112806 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12217310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.122173 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.istruc.2022.05.06110.1016/j.istruc.2022.05.061 ↗
37. A. Y.Aydar Statistical approaches with emphasis on design of experiments applied to chemical processes 2018 157–169.
38. Montgomery D. C. · 2017
39. L.Nielsen Danish Institute of Fundamental Metrology Lyngby 2001.
40. Sofi T. · Adv. Manuf: Polym. Compos. Sci. · 2018 · 4 · 57
41. 10.1177/089270570604956110.1177/0892705706049561 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.est.2021.10346810.1016/j.est.2021.103468 ↗
43. Cai Q. · IOP. Conf. Ser: Mater. Sci. Eng. · 2019 · 677 · 677
44. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2010.05.01510.1016/j.compositesa.2010.05.015 ↗
45. Y.Erturan Development of a structural design methodology for filament winding composite rocket motor case. Master Thesis The Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences of Middle East Technical University2019.
46. Zwillinger D. · 1998 · 158
47. S.T.Peters Composite filament winding. ASM International United States of America2011.10.31399/asm.tb.cfw.9781627083386 ↗