journal article·2022-04

Thermal degradation behavior and structures of thermoplastic cassava starch/sisal fiber composites

Yuxin Liu, Liangyan Liao, Junmei Xiong, Zesheng Liang

Polymer Composites· Volume 43· Issue 4
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract The thermoplastic cassava starch (TPS)/sisal fiber (SF) composites were prepared by melt blending. The effects of SF content and its surface treated by sodium hydroxide (NaOH) and silane coupling agent (KH550) on the thermal degradation behavior and structures of TPS were investigated by thermogravimetric‐mass spectrometry (TG‐MS), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), X‐ray diffraction (XRD) and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). The thermal decomposition temperatures of TPS/SF composites increase with the SF content. The thermal decomposition products of TPS/SF composites are mainly methane, H 2 O, acetylene, formaldehyde, methanol and CO 2 . The thermal stability of composites containing SF treated by NaOH is better than that of KH550. TPS/SF composites show A + V types crystal, and the sample containing SF treated by NaOH has the highest V type crystal. The experimental results reveal that the content and the surface of SF play an important role in the thermal stability and structures changes of TPS/SF composites.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging · biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Guangxi Key Laboratory of Natural Polymer Chemistry and Physics College of Chemistry and Materials, Nanning Normal University Nanning China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (38)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.aiepr.2019.11.00310.1016/j.aiepr.2019.11.003 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.matdes.2020.10937310.1016/j.matdes.2020.109373 ↗
3. 10.1002/pc.2423610.1002/pc.24236 ↗
4. 10.1002/pc.2536010.1002/pc.25360 ↗
5. 10.1002/pc.2573910.1002/pc.25739 ↗
6. 10.1016/S0040-6031(98)00517-610.1016/S0040-6031(98)00517-6 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.tca.2006.06.00210.1016/j.tca.2006.06.002 ↗
8. 10.1002/pc.2277310.1002/pc.22773 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jaap.2004.09.00510.1016/j.jaap.2004.09.005 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jaap.2017.05.01810.1016/j.jaap.2017.05.018 ↗
11. 10.1007/s10973-005-7274-710.1007/s10973-005-7274-7 ↗
12. 10.1002/pc.2631210.1002/pc.26312 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2003.11.01510.1016/j.carbpol.2003.11.015 ↗
14. 10.1515/jmbm-2018-200610.1515/jmbm-2018-2006 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2003.09.00310.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2003.09.003 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.01.06310.1016/j.carbpol.2018.01.063 ↗
17. 10.1177/002199831983174810.1177/0021998319831748 ↗
18. Verma A. · Mater. Perform. Charact. · 2017 · 6 · 50010.1520/MPC20170069 ↗
19. Campos A. · Polym. Degrad. Stab. · 1948 · 2012 · 97
20. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2004.02.00910.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2004.02.009 ↗
21. 10.1002/pc.1003310.1002/pc.10033 ↗
22. 10.1002/pc.2451110.1002/pc.24511 ↗
23. 10.1002/pc.2229510.1002/pc.22295 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2005.04.00710.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2005.04.007 ↗
25. 10.1177/002199830404273810.1177/0021998304042738 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.03.09410.1016/j.carbpol.2014.03.094 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2013.05.02510.1016/j.ijbiomac.2013.05.025 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2013.12.01410.1016/j.ijbiomac.2013.12.014 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.renene.2016.08.07210.1016/j.renene.2016.08.072 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.01.00610.1016/j.carbpol.2011.01.006 ↗
31. 10.1016/0040-6031(89)85037-310.1016/0040-6031(89)85037-3 ↗
32. 10.1094/CCHEM-86-4-038310.1094/CCHEM-86-4-0383 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.tca.2004.09.00610.1016/j.tca.2004.09.006 ↗
34. 10.1021/bm101124t10.1021/bm101124t ↗
35. 10.1021/acs.jafc.7b0545710.1021/acs.jafc.7b05457 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.polymer.2007.09.05110.1016/j.polymer.2007.09.051 ↗
37. 10.1021/jf00005a01310.1021/jf00005a013 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2015.05.00210.1016/j.foodhyd.2015.05.002 ↗