Thermal degradation behavior and structures of thermoplastic cassava starch/sisal fiber composites
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The thermoplastic cassava starch (TPS)/sisal fiber (SF) composites were prepared by melt blending. The effects of SF content and its surface treated by sodium hydroxide (NaOH) and silane coupling agent (KH550) on the thermal degradation behavior and structures of TPS were investigated by thermogravimetric‐mass spectrometry (TG‐MS), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), X‐ray diffraction (XRD) and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). The thermal decomposition temperatures of TPS/SF composites increase with the SF content. The thermal decomposition products of TPS/SF composites are mainly methane, H 2 O, acetylene, formaldehyde, methanol and CO 2 . The thermal stability of composites containing SF treated by NaOH is better than that of KH550. TPS/SF composites show A + V types crystal, and the sample containing SF treated by NaOH has the highest V type crystal. The experimental results reveal that the content and the surface of SF play an important role in the thermal stability and structures changes of TPS/SF composites.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging · biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Guangxi Key Laboratory of Natural Polymer Chemistry and Physics College of Chemistry and Materials, Nanning Normal University Nanning China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.aiepr.2019.11.00310.1016/j.aiepr.2019.11.003 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.matdes.2020.10937310.1016/j.matdes.2020.109373 ↗
3. 10.1002/pc.2423610.1002/pc.24236 ↗
4. 10.1002/pc.2536010.1002/pc.25360 ↗
5. 10.1002/pc.2573910.1002/pc.25739 ↗
6. 10.1016/S0040-6031(98)00517-610.1016/S0040-6031(98)00517-6 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.tca.2006.06.00210.1016/j.tca.2006.06.002 ↗
8. 10.1002/pc.2277310.1002/pc.22773 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jaap.2004.09.00510.1016/j.jaap.2004.09.005 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jaap.2017.05.01810.1016/j.jaap.2017.05.018 ↗
11. 10.1007/s10973-005-7274-710.1007/s10973-005-7274-7 ↗
12. 10.1002/pc.2631210.1002/pc.26312 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2003.11.01510.1016/j.carbpol.2003.11.015 ↗
14. 10.1515/jmbm-2018-200610.1515/jmbm-2018-2006 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2003.09.00310.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2003.09.003 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.01.06310.1016/j.carbpol.2018.01.063 ↗
17. 10.1177/002199831983174810.1177/0021998319831748 ↗
18. Verma A. · Mater. Perform. Charact. · 2017 · 6 · 50010.1520/MPC20170069 ↗
19. Campos A. · Polym. Degrad. Stab. · 1948 · 2012 · 97
20. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2004.02.00910.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2004.02.009 ↗
21. 10.1002/pc.1003310.1002/pc.10033 ↗
22. 10.1002/pc.2451110.1002/pc.24511 ↗
23. 10.1002/pc.2229510.1002/pc.22295 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2005.04.00710.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2005.04.007 ↗
25. 10.1177/002199830404273810.1177/0021998304042738 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.03.09410.1016/j.carbpol.2014.03.094 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2013.05.02510.1016/j.ijbiomac.2013.05.025 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2013.12.01410.1016/j.ijbiomac.2013.12.014 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.renene.2016.08.07210.1016/j.renene.2016.08.072 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.01.00610.1016/j.carbpol.2011.01.006 ↗
31. 10.1016/0040-6031(89)85037-310.1016/0040-6031(89)85037-3 ↗
32. 10.1094/CCHEM-86-4-038310.1094/CCHEM-86-4-0383 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.tca.2004.09.00610.1016/j.tca.2004.09.006 ↗
34. 10.1021/bm101124t10.1021/bm101124t ↗
35. 10.1021/acs.jafc.7b0545710.1021/acs.jafc.7b05457 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.polymer.2007.09.05110.1016/j.polymer.2007.09.051 ↗
37. 10.1021/jf00005a01310.1021/jf00005a013 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2015.05.00210.1016/j.foodhyd.2015.05.002 ↗